The purpose of this study was to develop a valid and reliable student rating scale to evaluate online courses in consortiums of cyber universities. Through a literature review, we have identified critical dimensions of student rating in off-line universities, cyber universities, and consortiums of cyber universities. With the critical dimensions, 52 items were created and a factor analysis was performed to check its construct validity. The emergent 10 factors were identified and 44 items were retained. The results of this study are as follows: First, the critical common dimensions of student ratings in off-line universities and cyber universities were 1)overall ratings, 2) Instructor/facilitator, 3) student, 4) interaction, 5) instructional design/organization/knowledge, 6) task, 7) evaluation, 8) system/support, 9) workload, 10) feedback, and 11) outcome. Second, critical dimensions to evaluate courses in consortiums of cyber universities were 1) overall ratings, 2) instructor, 3) student, 4) interaction, 5) instructional design, 6) task, 7) feedback, 8) evaluation, 9) system, 10) support, and 11) consortium. Third, the result of a factor analysis to prove the validity of the instrument identified 10 factors. Factor 1 was 'overall ratings', factor 2 was 'student', factor 3 was 'task', factor 4 was 'support(system and administration)', factor 5 was 'consortium I(difference between students)', factor 6 was 'feedback', factor 7 was 'instructional design', factor 8 was 'consortium II(diversity)', factor 9 was 'interaction', and factor 10 was 'evaluation'. In conclusion, the validity and reliability of this student rating scale was ensured to be used as a valid tool to evaluate courses in consortiums of cyber universities.
The purpose of this study was to develop a valid and reliable student rating scale to evaluate online courses in consortiums of cyber universities. Through a literature review, we have identified critical dimensions of student rating in off-line universities, cyber universities, and consortiums of cyber universities. With the critical dimensions, 52 items were created and a factor analysis was performed to check its construct validity. The emergent 10 factors were identified and 44 items were retained. The results of this study are as follows: First, the critical common dimensions of student ratings in off-line universities and cyber universities were 1)overall ratings, 2) Instructor/facilitator, 3) student, 4) interaction, 5) instructional design/organization/knowledge, 6) task, 7) evaluation, 8) system/support, 9) workload, 10) feedback, and 11) outcome. Second, critical dimensions to evaluate courses in consortiums of cyber universities were 1) overall ratings, 2) instructor, 3) student, 4) interaction, 5) instructional design, 6) task, 7) feedback, 8) evaluation, 9) system, 10) support, and 11) consortium. Third, the result of a factor analysis to prove the validity of the instrument identified 10 factors. Factor 1 was 'overall ratings', factor 2 was 'student', factor 3 was 'task', factor 4 was 'support(system and administration)', factor 5 was 'consortium I(difference between students)', factor 6 was 'feedback', factor 7 was 'instructional design', factor 8 was 'consortium II(diversity)', factor 9 was 'interaction', and factor 10 was 'evaluation'. In conclusion, the validity and reliability of this student rating scale was ensured to be used as a valid tool to evaluate courses in consortiums of cyber universities.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.