$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
안녕하세요!
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

컨소시엄 형태의 원격대학을 위한 강좌평가 척도 개발

The development of student rating scale to evaluate course in consortiums of cyber universities

교육정보미디어연구 v.13 no.1 , 2007년, pp.197 - 220  
주영주, 김나영
초록

The purpose of this study was to develop a valid and reliable student rating scale to evaluate online courses in consortiums of cyber universities. Through a literature review, we have identified critical dimensions of student rating in off-line universities, cyber universities, and consortiums of cyber universities. With the critical dimensions, 52 items were created and a factor analysis was performed to check its construct validity. The emergent 10 factors were identified and 44 items were retained. The results of this study are as follows: First, the critical common dimensions of student ratings in off-line universities and cyber universities were 1)overall ratings, 2) Instructor/facilitator, 3) student, 4) interaction, 5) instructional design/organization/knowledge, 6) task, 7) evaluation, 8) system/support, 9) workload, 10) feedback, and 11) outcome. Second, critical dimensions to evaluate courses in consortiums of cyber universities were 1) overall ratings, 2) instructor, 3) student, 4) interaction, 5) instructional design, 6) task, 7) feedback, 8) evaluation, 9) system, 10) support, and 11) consortium. Third, the result of a factor analysis to prove the validity of the instrument identified 10 factors. Factor 1 was 'overall ratings', factor 2 was 'student', factor 3 was 'task', factor 4 was 'support(system and administration)', factor 5 was 'consortium I(difference between students)', factor 6 was 'feedback', factor 7 was 'instructional design', factor 8 was 'consortium II(diversity)', factor 9 was 'interaction', and factor 10 was 'evaluation'. In conclusion, the validity and reliability of this student rating scale was ensured to be used as a valid tool to evaluate courses in consortiums of cyber universities.

참고문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문의 참고문헌 없음

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • KCI :

원문 URL 링크

  • 원문 URL 링크 정보가 존재하지 않습니다.
상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일