$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
안녕하세요!
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

외국인이 보는 한국 구비문학

Korean Oral Literature as Seen by Foreigners

구비문학연구 no.27 , 2008년, pp.147 - 175  
나수호
초록

This paper begins with the question of how foreigners in Korea view Korean oral literature and goes on to deal with the issues underlying that question, ultimately aiming to take the first step in providing an answer. To this end, a survey was conducted that targeted foreigners residing in Korea; in addition, two of the respondents were interviewed. The results are as follows.The first part of the survey dealt with demographic information, with questions on nationality, ethnicity, length of stay in Korea, occupation, age, and Korean language proficiency. The second part dealt with views and opinions on traditional and modern culture and oral literature. Most respondents chose Confucian culture as the defining characteristic of traditional Korean culture, while technology was seen as the defining characteristic of modern Korean culture. Recognition of traditional genres of Korean oral literature was as follows, from highest level of recognition to lowest: tales and stories, proverbs and sayings, pansori, folk songs, mask dances, shaman songs, and puppet plays. Opinions on modern Korean oral literature can be placed into one of three general categories: those that focused on a traditional genre that survives to the present, such as tales and pansori, those that focused on a modern representation, such as pop music or television dramas, and those that saw modern oral literature as a meeting of past and present.The interviews dealt mainly with two questions: how can we make Korean oral literature more accessible to foreigners, and what does Korean need to do to become a truly multicultural society? With regards to the first question, the interviewees had similar views, namely that bringing Korean oral literature to foreigners cannot be a one-way road. They also mentioned that the views of foreigners must be taken into consideration and thought given to the issue of how to make oral literature more palatable to foreigners. Replying to the second question, they stressed the need to come to a greater understanding of foreigners living in Korea rather than efforts to simply advertise Korea to foreigners. They also noted that Koreans needed to accept the possibility of a reinterpretation by the Other of Korean culture and literature.The question of how foreigners view Korean oral literature ultimately deals with a meeting with the Other. Rather than engaging in a one-way education of foreigners on Korean culture or oral literature, it would be better to aim for a place where culture and oral literature are shared within a meeting with the Other, and to work to create a world of mutual understanding and communication.

참고문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문의 참고문헌 없음

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • 원문 PDF 정보가 존재하지 않습니다.

원문 URL 링크

  • 원문 URL 링크 정보가 존재하지 않습니다.
상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일