• 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

경제위기 이후 대기업의 연구개발투자에 대한 조세지원제도의 효과 분석

The Impact of Tax Incentives on Major Firms' R&D Investment after the Economic Crisis

회계ㆍ세무와 감사 연구 no.49 , 2009년, pp.105 - 135   http://dx.doi.org/10.22781/kicpa.2009..49.105

Tax incentives aim at achieving specific national economic objectives, one of which is to encourage firms to invest in R&D. This study examines the impact of changes in tax incentives, R&D tax credit and reserves for R&D, on the major firms' R&D investments after the Asian economic crisis. The tax incentives for major firms' R&D have diminished since the economic crisis because Korean tax authority thought that large companies had motivation and ability enough to make R&D investment without government's tax incentives. However, the tax policy for R&D was changed to give more incentives to large companies from 2008. In spite of a lot of money for tax incentives and the big change of tax policy, there is not a study that analyzes the effectiveness of tax incentives for R&D after the Asian economic crisis. There are four changes in tax incentives from 2000 to 2007. In 2000, major firms can choose the larger amount as tax credit between 5% of R&D expenses and 50% of R&D expenses which exceed the average expenses occurred during the immediately preceding four business years. However, only 50% of the excess of expenses incurred for R&D is applied as tax credit rate in 2001, so tax incentives for R&D is curtailed from 2000 to 2001. From 2003, R&D tax credit rate is decreased from 50% to 40%. In 2006, tax incentive is boosted contrary to the previous years. Tax credit rate on the R&D expenditures incurred to commission small and medium-sized enterprises or universities to conduct R&D increases from 40% to 50%. In 2007, reserves for R&D is abolished. In short, tax incentives are cut down in (2001∼2002), (2003∼2005), and (2007), but are expanded in (2006). This study hypothesizes that R&D expenditures of major firms would increase(decrease) as tax incentives for R&D expand(cut down).This study uses 1,512 firm-year observations collected from Korean stock market over 2000-2007 period with multiple regression analysis. Sample firms are only large companies which have experiences to invest in R&D activities. The sample of prior studies included medium-sized companies and large companies that invested no money into R&D, which might induce misleading results. To analyze the effect of changes in tax incentives for R&D on the firms' R&D expenditure, control variables such as R&D expenditure of the previous year, internal financing(measured by cash flow from operating), external financing(measured by net cash flow from financing), debt ratio, Tobin's q ratio, profitability(measured by return on asset), size, principal stakeholders' equity ratio, and industry dummy variables are incorporated into the research model. In this study, I find that the four changes in tax incentives from 2000 to 2007 don't have a significant predicted effect on the large firms' R&D investment. The coefficients of and are negative as predicted, but not significant. The coefficient of is also positive as predicted, but not significant. The coefficient of is statistically significant, but its sign is different from the predicted. R&D investment during 2003-2005 period significantly increases relative to 2001-2002 period in spite of the 10% cut in tax credit rate for R&D of 2003. These results imply that the expansion (curtailment) in tax incentives for R&D doesn't increase(decrease) the R&D spending of major firms after the Asian economic crisis.To investigate the unexpected results further, I examine if the tax burden of an individual firm affects the relation between the changes in tax incentives and R&D investment. I classify firms into a low and a high tax burden group based on the effective tax rate. Expansion in tax incentives significantly increases the R&D investment in the high tax burden group. In the low tax burden group, however, expansion(cut) in tax incentives doesn't increase(decrease) the R&D investment. Instead, cut in tax incentives of 2003 leads to the increase of R&D expenditure in the low tax burden group. These results imply that th...

참고문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문의 참고문헌 없음

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음


원문 PDF 다운로드

  • KCI :

원문 URL 링크

  • 원문 URL 링크 정보가 존재하지 않습니다.
상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일