This study purports to elucidate and critically examine the philosophical disputes between Habermas and Foucault. The face-to-face debate between the two, planned by an American conference in 1984, wasn't held allegedly because they could not agree on the proposed subject, 'modernity.' Picking up the very subject, this essay attempts to realize the unheld discussion. By way of doing this, it reveals how Foucault and Habermas relate Enlightenment, modernism, and humanism to one another. and explains the difference between their explications. And it also contextualizes their life-long projects in relation to these ideas. Next, this study critically examines their interpretations of the three ideas. The last chapter analyzes the implications of the debates in various dimensions.
This study purports to elucidate and critically examine the philosophical disputes between Habermas and Foucault. The face-to-face debate between the two, planned by an American conference in 1984, wasn't held allegedly because they could not agree on the proposed subject, 'modernity.' Picking up the very subject, this essay attempts to realize the unheld discussion. By way of doing this, it reveals how Foucault and Habermas relate Enlightenment, modernism, and humanism to one another. and explains the difference between their explications. And it also contextualizes their life-long projects in relation to these ideas. Next, this study critically examines their interpretations of the three ideas. The last chapter analyzes the implications of the debates in various dimensions.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.