$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
안녕하세요!
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

1990년대 이후 한국사학계의 방법론적 모색 -쟁점ㆍ좌표ㆍ가능성에 대한 비평적 검토

A Critical Examination Concerning the Methodological Exploration in Korean History Academia since 1990s

시대와 철학 v.22 no.2 , 2011년, pp.291 - 347  
이하나
초록

This thesis aims to examine the methodological questions raised since 1990s as an interdisciplinary approach and the key issues which became vital arguments in the viewpoint of Social-Humanities as a search for alternatives and an introspection about the institutional academic system. I also tried to examine critically the new trend of Korean history academia which is motivated by these arguments. The post-discourses was cited by the collapse of socialist states and raised in the form of a criticism and a search for alternatives of ‘Scientific practical history’ which was proposed by young progressive scholars in 1980s. The issues of the Post Discourses toward ‘Scientific practical history’was summarized by the criticism to the theory of immanent development and the history of people(Minjung). The scholars on the critical stance toward the theory of immanent development see the nationalism and the modernism as twins of modern and criticize the theory of immanent development as a nationalistic and modernistic view of history. They focused that the idea of ‘Minjung’ was discovered as a people in charge of resistance from the binarity of the exploitation and resistance and that it has some aspects of the public which has diverse existence way, trying to break away from the dichotomous historical awareness. In this criticism,Korean history academia raised a new tendency of historical perception and historiography. Their characteristics are firstly the switch from socio-economic history to social history and secondly the transition from the social history to cultural history. In the switch to social history, they were proposed that local history, regional studies, and ‘people’s history’, and the history of daily life, oral history, and the memorial studies shows us the symptom of the transition to cultural history. This new trend of history gave an impetus to change of history and progress paradigm of Korean history academia by seeing objectively and critically the values of modern and modernity which has been taken for granted in the past. However this trend influenced by the post-discourses exposure the limitation by adopting an air of indifference relatively in investigating historically the real problem of capitalism, imperialism, new liberalism, and the division system of Korean peninsula. The coming tasks are to overcome the conservativeness come from the institutionalization of ‘Scientific practical history’, and to recover the praticeness which embrace real problem as a question of ourselves. In this viewpoint, it is demanded the methodology of social cultural history which involve the cultural problem in the field of study.

참고문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문의 참고문헌 없음

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • 원문 PDF 정보가 존재하지 않습니다.

원문 URL 링크

  • 원문 URL 링크 정보가 존재하지 않습니다.
상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일