• 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

특허침해소송에서의 권리남용의 적용에 대한 비판적 고찰

A Critical Study on Application of Abuse of Right in Patent Right Infringement Litigation

법학논총 v.29 no.4 , 2012년, pp.391 - 412  

Recently, Supreme Court judged that a patent right has not been effective on the other worked invention by accepting defense of invalidation of patent registration based on a obvious absence of inventive step in a patent right infringement litigation(Supreme Court Decision No.2010Da95390; January 19. 2012). And this determination was also based on an abuse of right about exercising the patent right. In case Patent right has been granted against inventive step, a requirement for patent registration and a reason for invalidation of patent registration, this right should have been only determined as being invalid by a invalidation trial based on the former standard of determination. But Supreme Court has determined whether a patent registration was invalid or not about that in a patent right infringement litigation. In the above Court’s decision, it was determined that a patent didn’t have obviously inventive step and further exercising the patent right fell in an abuse of right in a patent right infringement litigation against the above Patent Law’s principle and the former Supreme Court decision. I think that the determination of the above Court like this is unreasonable, since determination of invalidation of patent and an abuse of right based on an absence of inventive step in a patent right infringement litigation is against Patent Law’s principle and official rights of administrative acts. Therefore, I think that it is proper to revise patent law or apply protest of free technology to patent right infringement case instead of abuse of right. In conclusion, this paper critically analyses and examines a number of problems from the subject case.

참고문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문의 참고문헌 없음

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음

DOI 인용 스타일