$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
안녕하세요!
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

테러와의 전쟁과 관련된 신(新) 법률문제에 대한 연구 - 미국 법원의 판례를 중심으로

A Study on the Arising New Legal Issues Derived from the Global War on Terror: Lessons from the U.S.A Courts Cases

중앙법학 v.15 no.1 , 2013년, pp.47 - 89   http://dx.doi.org/10.21759/caulaw.2013.15.1.47
한희원
초록

The disaster of September 11th 2001 has greatly sh처n the direness of terrorism, and less than 12 hours after the 9/11 attacks, former President George W. Bush proclaimed the start of the global war on terror. However, the critics argue that his approach to the war on terror has breed even more terrorists than it has eliminated and has also raised those questions like; will this kind of war ever end?, How long will it take?, Will we recognize it when victory came and what is its legal effect?Criticism of the war on terror addresses the morals, ethics, efficiency, economics and legal issues surrounding the war. The Human Rights Watch has criticized the Guantanamo Bay detention camp, saying: “Washington has ignored human rights standards in its own treatment of terrorism suspects.” The Amnesty International also has criticized the Bush’s policy, calling the facility the “gulag of our times.” Barack Obama even described Guantanamo as a “sad chapter in American history” and during his 2008 presidential campaign, he promised to close down the prison in 2009, however his promise does not come true. On the contrary, in a February 2012 poll, 70% of Americans replied that they approved the continued operation of Guantanamo. Especially concerning the legal status of the detainees at the Guantanamo camp, at first, the Bush administration asserted that detainees are not prison of war and are therefore not entitled to any of the protections of the Geneva Conventions. However, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in ‘Hamdan v. Rumsfeld’ on June 29th 2006, that they are war prisoners. This ruling show delicacy and difficulty of new legal issues on the academic society, policy maker as well as legislative.From all these points of view, this article examines arising various legal issues derived from the war on terror including the legality of enhanced interrogation techniques, preemptive doctrines, irregular rendition and the discussion of legal status of the detainees at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp.

참고문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문의 참고문헌 없음

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • KCI :

원문 URL 링크

  • 원문 URL 링크 정보가 존재하지 않습니다.
상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일