$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
안녕하세요!
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

종교활동의 제한 기준에 대한 일본 판례의 시사점

Implication of the Japan Precedents on the Restriction Criteria of Religious Activities

법학연구 no.55 , 2014년, pp.135 - 152  
최춘식
초록

After the terrorist attacks in the subway by religious organizations in 1995, Japan revisedthe Religious Corporation Act. The main purpose was to monitor religious organizations incollaboration with the believers and the governmental authorities for transparent operationof religious organizations. However, in addition to this work, from around 2000, focusingon cases of lower court, it recognized tort liability of religious groups for the reason ofreligious self-determination violation in the course of missionary activities. Because thesecases have kept for 10 years, it is said to be the established case law. Even if they arereligious organizations, tort should be recognized in a separate and individual incident. However the case law in this case is not the same as an individual. That is, it's thequestion whether they have responsibility to cover damages or not after withdrawal ofbelievers who joined in the religious organizations, because the mission work andedification activities of that religious organizations were comprehensively illegal. There isnot a special law about religious organizations in our country currently. So this studymainly includes investigations of illegal activities occurred in the course of religiousactivities focusing on Japanese precedents. These religious groups recognized with theillegality have been criticized by Japanese society before precedents was formed. Also, afterthe terrorist attacks in the subway by religious groups in 1995, Social opinion, that legalrestrictions on religious organizations should be strengthened, has already formed. Thereforewe can know that Japanese cases are not formed in accordance with a special legislativebasis. We can understand Japanese cases are formed according to requirement forestablishment of civilly tort. In these aspects, I think these cases can be valuable referencesin our country.

참고문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문의 참고문헌 없음

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • 원문 PDF 정보가 존재하지 않습니다.

원문 URL 링크

  • 원문 URL 링크 정보가 존재하지 않습니다.
상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일