$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
안녕하세요!
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

신자유주의와 행정, 그 문제와 극복방안: 하버마스의 사회이론을 중심으로

Neoliberalism and Public Administration, Problem and Solution : The Social Theory of Habermas

현대사회와 행정 v.25 no.1 , 2015년, pp.193 - 220  
소영진
초록

Neo-liberalism is characterized by, unlike classical liberalism, a complex of the market and government. So the role and the status of public administration in neo-liberal social system is essential. Neo-liberalism has rapidly spread all over the world since 1980s. In most nations, government systems have changed into neo-liberal one. the acdemic field of public administration also has devoted to propagate the tenet of neo-liberalism. It became almost a ‘natural order’. But recently a series of incidents such as 2008 financial crisis and global depression etc. made neo-liberalism discreditable. negative effects of neo-liberalism such as rich-poor gap, decline of job opportunity, economic crisis etc. brought about global protests. Critics and reflects on neo-liberalism began rise everywhere which includes public administration. In this study I would like to consider the meaning and alternatives of neo-liberalism in public administration. firstly I'll introduce the interpretation of Habermas on the neo-liberalism which appears as domination and legitimacy crisis. secondly I debate the characteristics of deliberative democracy which Habermas suggested as an alternative of neo-liberal system. thirdly I’ll review the meaning and reality of deliberative democracy. In Habermas thought, neo-liberal society is characterized by accumulation crisis of post-capitalism, legitimacy crisis which is brought about by market-side effort of the state, colonialization of life-world, and domination of instrumental reason etc. He intends to surmount neo-liberalism by restoration of public sphere which is based on communicative rationality. This is his theory of deliberative democracy. It confront neo-liberalism in many aspects such as publicness, procedural democracy, constitutionalism, variety, life politics.

참고문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문의 참고문헌 없음

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • 원문 PDF 정보가 존재하지 않습니다.

원문 URL 링크

  • 원문 URL 링크 정보가 존재하지 않습니다.
상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일