$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
안녕하세요!
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

변호사시험에서의 형사법 선택형 문제의 적합성 연구

Study on Adequacy and Validity of Selective-type Questions of the Criminal Law in Bar Examination

외법논집 v.39 no.4 , 2015년, pp.187 - 205   http://dx.doi.org/10.17257/hufslr.2015.39.4.187
이창현
초록

Bar examination must be set in a collection of selective-type and essay-type written exams largely concerning the Public Law, the Civil Law and the Criminal Law. This paper studies adequacy and validity of the questions focusing on question No. 21 and question No. 40 of Book-Type I, which are the selective-type examination questions of the Criminal Law that became one of the most objection and were heavily argued by the exam-takers participated in 4th Bar Examination.The question No. 21 of Book-Type I was a question addressed a very important issue concerning modification of an indictment in the Criminal Procedure Act, and as a combined type of the Criminal Law and the Criminal Procedure Act, the question No. 40 of Book-Type I was a question addressed several issues, one of which criminal charge was established in two(2) situations separately spreaded since a criminal committed trespass upon residence at night for stealing, and the other one was a right to remain silent. Regarding the above two questions, they had to choose ‘which of the following is NOT true?’ in five texts, and distinguish between right and wrong by judicial precedent if there are arguments over a theory, and its right answer was the text ④ determined by the Ministry of Justice. However, as the results thoroughly examined the related references and judicial precedent, they are considered that there is no right answer to the question No. 21 of Book-Type I, and the right answer to the question No. 40 of Book-Type I is the text ④ including the text ②.As noted above, these mistakes for the selective-type questions make themselves worse. More than that, it is pointed out that situations should be more criticized, of which did not admit these mistakes and insisted wrong answers constantly without any based-explanation.Additionally, in Bar Examination, to serve to train the desirable legal profession tailored for the educational ideas of law school; First, through harmful consequences caused by selective-type examination questions in Bar Examination, fundamental discussion about the need for selective-type exams and its way is needed. Second, for essay-type exams as well as selective-type exams, their right answers should be released. If there is any reasonal objection against a right answer, the basis of the right answer should be definitely released. Third, the organization and management of meeting for the right answer confirmation should be announced, and its supervisory procedure should be more transparently and fairly fulfilled.

참고문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문의 참고문헌 없음

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • KCI :

원문 URL 링크

  • 원문 URL 링크 정보가 존재하지 않습니다.
상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일