최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기철학사상 no.60 2016년, pp.227 - 255 http://dx.doi.org/10.15750/chss..60.201605.008008
박종준 (서울시립대학교)
Being faced with the criticisms of the golden rule that it could not successfully be qualified as a moral principle, contemporary defenders has changed it into different form. The contemporary golden rules could be characterized by ‘equalized’, ‘reciprocated’, ‘rationalized’. Critics and defenders use a generalized form of the golden rule such as “Do unto others what you would have them do unto you” or “Do not unto others what you would not have them do unto you” which is called ‘the passive rule’. I argue in this paper that the contemporary generalized golden rules have a serious moral problem, and that the particular moral values pointed in the original texts where the idea of golden rule derives from can not be successfully emphasized by the general form.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.