The excess profits made by collecting tax on laud in the later half of the 1980's has caused a sudden increase in the value of land (1987;14.7%, 1988;27.5%, 1989;32.0%). This has caused the national competitive power to deteriorate and has threatened the majority of the people's life security. As th...
The excess profits made by collecting tax on laud in the later half of the 1980's has caused a sudden increase in the value of land (1987;14.7%, 1988;27.5%, 1989;32.0%). This has caused the national competitive power to deteriorate and has threatened the majority of the people's life security. As this happened a counter measure such as an excess of housing sites reaching a maximum level and a prohibition on the burden in development were introduced. By 1991, the collection of excess profits made by tax on land was stabilized zone. Then the value of land declined for the very first time in 1992 by -1.3% and in 1993 by -7.4%. Like these declination of land value stagnated both the economy and the real estates, the public conception system on the price of land has stabilized the sudden increase of the land value. It served as a commutated explosion by taking a downward trend. Fundamentally, like excess profits made by collecting tax on land; it cannot stablize the value of land by a taxation system. The value of land rising due to the application and the scarcity of the land has caused. Like Korea's household expense to become insufficient. In this case, as for the growth and the development of our economy, urbanization and industrialization progress rapidily; and if each development work is achieved, the value of the regionally will rise continuosly. But if the correlation in the price of land maintainas in good order; as the value of land rises, our expectantious shows control in speculative demand and so the increase in the land value in specific regions will not be able to accelerate; and instead other regions will shows a pervasive effect and will be holdback In the possessing of land, imposing a tax will strengthen marginal profits. This will lead to an imposition on tax, alienating income tan becoming rationalized causing generalized land tax. This causes a balance on tax burden; utilizes the land as a utility factor, and enables to contrive an aim in stablizing the lost of land. But the general tax on land; looking at all the land in this country, due to the annual assessments defying taxs becomes big and Korea's land cost compared to both income and productivity is over-criticized and so to strengthen the general land tax to a more advanced standard is very efficient to be achieved in a short period of time. To make excess profit by collecting tax on land a taxation target is set on unused land. But in reality, this is impossible to happen due to the fact that unused lands'judgement standard or the exceptional standard must go through the resident's included authorization and as it is contravented as a law tax, the unused land is rationally objective and therefore is impossible to classify. Excess profit made by collecting tax on land, the unused land looked in the judgement standard is gone through the list and classified in different land uses. This looked in society; specialization, devision and diversion must be encountered in order to pursue the unused land and since it must go through official regulations, the complexity of tax administration are brought about. All lands must be developed except for the outnumbered unused land. All lands which are usable must be made equal and must be made sold at a fair reasonable price. Both specialized industry and economically aimed land must be taxed. Due to both the changes in the use of land and regional developments, although the tax on these lands rises, if it is not an unused land the excess profits made by passing takes on lands system does not come to an effect if hinders the certain level and therefore the aim in the use of lands' utility factor and the excess profit made becomes anti-speculative and the problems of effectivness is presented. This is result, the unused land is considered as a objective manner and must be seen as a redused, certain limit.
The excess profits made by collecting tax on laud in the later half of the 1980's has caused a sudden increase in the value of land (1987;14.7%, 1988;27.5%, 1989;32.0%). This has caused the national competitive power to deteriorate and has threatened the majority of the people's life security. As this happened a counter measure such as an excess of housing sites reaching a maximum level and a prohibition on the burden in development were introduced. By 1991, the collection of excess profits made by tax on land was stabilized zone. Then the value of land declined for the very first time in 1992 by -1.3% and in 1993 by -7.4%. Like these declination of land value stagnated both the economy and the real estates, the public conception system on the price of land has stabilized the sudden increase of the land value. It served as a commutated explosion by taking a downward trend. Fundamentally, like excess profits made by collecting tax on land; it cannot stablize the value of land by a taxation system. The value of land rising due to the application and the scarcity of the land has caused. Like Korea's household expense to become insufficient. In this case, as for the growth and the development of our economy, urbanization and industrialization progress rapidily; and if each development work is achieved, the value of the regionally will rise continuosly. But if the correlation in the price of land maintainas in good order; as the value of land rises, our expectantious shows control in speculative demand and so the increase in the land value in specific regions will not be able to accelerate; and instead other regions will shows a pervasive effect and will be holdback In the possessing of land, imposing a tax will strengthen marginal profits. This will lead to an imposition on tax, alienating income tan becoming rationalized causing generalized land tax. This causes a balance on tax burden; utilizes the land as a utility factor, and enables to contrive an aim in stablizing the lost of land. But the general tax on land; looking at all the land in this country, due to the annual assessments defying taxs becomes big and Korea's land cost compared to both income and productivity is over-criticized and so to strengthen the general land tax to a more advanced standard is very efficient to be achieved in a short period of time. To make excess profit by collecting tax on land a taxation target is set on unused land. But in reality, this is impossible to happen due to the fact that unused lands'judgement standard or the exceptional standard must go through the resident's included authorization and as it is contravented as a law tax, the unused land is rationally objective and therefore is impossible to classify. Excess profit made by collecting tax on land, the unused land looked in the judgement standard is gone through the list and classified in different land uses. This looked in society; specialization, devision and diversion must be encountered in order to pursue the unused land and since it must go through official regulations, the complexity of tax administration are brought about. All lands must be developed except for the outnumbered unused land. All lands which are usable must be made equal and must be made sold at a fair reasonable price. Both specialized industry and economically aimed land must be taxed. Due to both the changes in the use of land and regional developments, although the tax on these lands rises, if it is not an unused land the excess profits made by passing takes on lands system does not come to an effect if hinders the certain level and therefore the aim in the use of lands' utility factor and the excess profit made becomes anti-speculative and the problems of effectivness is presented. This is result, the unused land is considered as a objective manner and must be seen as a redused, certain limit.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.