Earlier Chinese law was influenced by the Soviet law and Marx's philosophical thoughts, thus exhibiting the characteristics of a socialist country. Later, as China’s economy developed, the country experienced political, economic and legal transformation. After referring from the civil law system and...
Earlier Chinese law was influenced by the Soviet law and Marx's philosophical thoughts, thus exhibiting the characteristics of a socialist country. Later, as China’s economy developed, the country experienced political, economic and legal transformation. After referring from the civil law system and citing many of its rules, China revised its legislation. On the one hand, Chinese law has inherited the tradition of Soviet law, bestowing courts and procuratorates with legal powers to trial supervision, so that they can be the subject of a retrial. On the other hand, the theory of civil law system was introduced and has strengthened the rights of parties in a retrial procedure.
In China, "the trial supervision procedure" is also called the retrial procedure. However, as a socialist country, Chinese retrial procedure is quite different from that of other civil law countries. However, it has one similarity with those countries: Parties, courts and procuratorates can all become the subject of a retrial procedure.
In addition, due to its internal political and historical upheavals, China has three special regions: Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan. The individual laws of these regions have their own particularities, which are quite different from Chinese laws.
This thesis introduces the "the trial supervision procedure" in Chinese law, as well as the special systems of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, by investigating the relevant regulations in these regions. Then, the paper compares the information with the Korean retrial procedure, and puts forward suggestions for the improvement of Chinese law.
The first chapter of this thesis is the introduction, which describes the overall view of the thesis topic. The second chapter discusses the general theory of the trial supervision procedure. This is a special concept in Chinese law, and therefore, its meaning and foundation are stated in this chapter. In addition, as a socialist country, China maintains a trial supervision system, which is similar to the trial supervision procedure.
Chapter 2 compares the trial supervision system with the trial supervision procedure. At the end of this chapter, the trial supervision procedure in civil law, criminal law and administrative law are compared.
In the third chapter, the author studies the trial supervision procedures specific to China, and introduces three subjects that can be admitted for retrial. Later in this chapter, details of the review and trial method of the retrial are examined.
The fourth chapter discusses the relevant retrial systems of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan of China. The author also presents the retrial system in South Korea. Among them, legislations in Hong Kong are in accordance with the laws of the United Kingdom, while those in Macao are in accordance with the laws of Portugal. As a result, the retrial systems in these two regions are significantly different from that in mainland China. In addition, as mainland China, Taiwan and South Korea are all affected by the civil law system, their respective retrial procedures have several features in common.
In the fifth chapter, the author establishes the related problems of the trial supervision procedure in China, and proposes improvement plans to address them.
The sixth chapter is the conclusion of this thesis. Due to its national culture, historical events, economic problems and political upheavals, Chinese legislation has become very complicated. The laws of its different regions are diverse.
In general, the laws of mainland China reflect the influence from both the socialist state theory and the civil law system. Due to this complexity, Chinese law is not perfect; sometimes, there will be conflicts within the system itself. This challenge is particularly evident in the trial supervision procedure. By studying the laws of Chinese mainland, Chinese special regions, and South Korea, this thesis aims to contribute to the development of Chinese laws in the future. The author also hopes to promote the mutual reference of laws between different countries or regions.中國作為社會主義國家,其自身法律最初受蘇聯法和馬克思的哲學思想影響,有非常強烈的社會主義國家的特點。隨後,隨着經濟發展,中國國內經歷了政治、經濟和法律的轉型。中國國內通過若干次法律修訂,將大陸法系的很多規定借鑒到本國法中。這個特點在審判監督程序中有着明顯體現。一方面,中國法繼承了蘇聯法的傳統,賦予法院和檢察院審判監督的權利,讓法院和檢察院可以作為再審的主體提出再審。另一方面,中國法又借鑒了大陸法系的理論,強化了當事人在再審程序中的相關權利。
中國的審判監督程序又叫再審程序。但是由於中國的特殊國家性質,所以中國的再審程序和大陸國家普遍認識的再審程序有較大差異。在中國,當事人、法院和檢察院都可以成為再審的提出主體。在這個意義上,中國再審中當事人提出再審的部分,與大陸法系國家的再審程序相似。
此外,中國由於自身的政治和歷史問題,國內存在三個特殊的地區,即,香港、澳門和台灣。這三個地區的法律有其自身的特殊性,和中國法有很大差異。
本文通過介紹中國法中的審判監督程序,對中國法的特殊性做出介紹。通過考察中國香港、中國澳門和中國台灣法律中的相關規定,介紹這幾個地區的特殊制度。之後,比較韓國再審程序,為中國法的改善提出思路。
本文的第一章是緒論,陳述了這篇論文的概況。
本文的第二章是審判監督程序的一般論。由於審判監督程序是中國法上的特殊概念,在第二章中,陳述了審判監督程序的概念、意義、和相關主體可以提出審判監督程序的依據。此外,由於中國社會主義國家的國家性質,中國國內還存在審判監督體系,第二章也將審判監督體系與審判監督程序做出了比較。第二章的最後,比較了民事、刑事和行政法中的審判監督程序。
在第三章中,筆者具體地研究了中國的審判監督程序,介紹了可以提出再審的三個主體。當事者依申請提出再審,檢察院依抗訴提出再審,法院以自身決定提出再審。之後,還詳細介紹了再審的審查和審判方法。
本文第四章介紹了中國的香港、澳門和台灣的相關制度。以及對韓國的再審制度做出了考察。這其中,中國香港依據英國法立法,中國澳門依據葡萄牙法立法,這兩個地區的再審制度和中國大陸有顯著不同。中國大陸、中國台灣和韓國由於都受到了大陸法系的影響,再審方面有一定的共同特徵。
在本文的第五章,筆者提出了中國審判監督程序的相關問題,並且提出了改善方案。筆者從理論和具體制度的層面探討了中國的審判監督程序的缺點,並提出了改善方案。
第六章是結論,對中國審判監督程序做出小結。
中國由於自身的國家性質、歷史原因、經濟政治問題,國內的立法體現出十分複雜的情況。不同地區間的法律有所差異,中國大陸自身的法律也體現出社會主義國家理論和大陸法系的影響。這其中,由於自身的複雜性,導致中國法律不夠完善,有時不同的理論之間會有衝突。這個特點在審判監督程序中體現的尤為明顯。本文通過考察中國大陸和特殊地區的法律,考察韓國的法律,對中國審判監督程序做出研究,為以後中國能夠制定出更和諧的法律做出貢獻,也希望可以為不同國家或地區間的法律的相互借鑒和參考做出貢獻。
Earlier Chinese law was influenced by the Soviet law and Marx's philosophical thoughts, thus exhibiting the characteristics of a socialist country. Later, as China’s economy developed, the country experienced political, economic and legal transformation. After referring from the civil law system and citing many of its rules, China revised its legislation. On the one hand, Chinese law has inherited the tradition of Soviet law, bestowing courts and procuratorates with legal powers to trial supervision, so that they can be the subject of a retrial. On the other hand, the theory of civil law system was introduced and has strengthened the rights of parties in a retrial procedure.
In China, "the trial supervision procedure" is also called the retrial procedure. However, as a socialist country, Chinese retrial procedure is quite different from that of other civil law countries. However, it has one similarity with those countries: Parties, courts and procuratorates can all become the subject of a retrial procedure.
In addition, due to its internal political and historical upheavals, China has three special regions: Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan. The individual laws of these regions have their own particularities, which are quite different from Chinese laws.
This thesis introduces the "the trial supervision procedure" in Chinese law, as well as the special systems of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, by investigating the relevant regulations in these regions. Then, the paper compares the information with the Korean retrial procedure, and puts forward suggestions for the improvement of Chinese law.
The first chapter of this thesis is the introduction, which describes the overall view of the thesis topic. The second chapter discusses the general theory of the trial supervision procedure. This is a special concept in Chinese law, and therefore, its meaning and foundation are stated in this chapter. In addition, as a socialist country, China maintains a trial supervision system, which is similar to the trial supervision procedure.
Chapter 2 compares the trial supervision system with the trial supervision procedure. At the end of this chapter, the trial supervision procedure in civil law, criminal law and administrative law are compared.
In the third chapter, the author studies the trial supervision procedures specific to China, and introduces three subjects that can be admitted for retrial. Later in this chapter, details of the review and trial method of the retrial are examined.
The fourth chapter discusses the relevant retrial systems of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan of China. The author also presents the retrial system in South Korea. Among them, legislations in Hong Kong are in accordance with the laws of the United Kingdom, while those in Macao are in accordance with the laws of Portugal. As a result, the retrial systems in these two regions are significantly different from that in mainland China. In addition, as mainland China, Taiwan and South Korea are all affected by the civil law system, their respective retrial procedures have several features in common.
In the fifth chapter, the author establishes the related problems of the trial supervision procedure in China, and proposes improvement plans to address them.
The sixth chapter is the conclusion of this thesis. Due to its national culture, historical events, economic problems and political upheavals, Chinese legislation has become very complicated. The laws of its different regions are diverse.
In general, the laws of mainland China reflect the influence from both the socialist state theory and the civil law system. Due to this complexity, Chinese law is not perfect; sometimes, there will be conflicts within the system itself. This challenge is particularly evident in the trial supervision procedure. By studying the laws of Chinese mainland, Chinese special regions, and South Korea, this thesis aims to contribute to the development of Chinese laws in the future. The author also hopes to promote the mutual reference of laws between different countries or regions.中國作為社會主義國家,其自身法律最初受蘇聯法和馬克思的哲學思想影響,有非常強烈的社會主義國家的特點。隨後,隨着經濟發展,中國國內經歷了政治、經濟和法律的轉型。中國國內通過若干次法律修訂,將大陸法系的很多規定借鑒到本國法中。這個特點在審判監督程序中有着明顯體現。一方面,中國法繼承了蘇聯法的傳統,賦予法院和檢察院審判監督的權利,讓法院和檢察院可以作為再審的主體提出再審。另一方面,中國法又借鑒了大陸法系的理論,強化了當事人在再審程序中的相關權利。
中國的審判監督程序又叫再審程序。但是由於中國的特殊國家性質,所以中國的再審程序和大陸國家普遍認識的再審程序有較大差異。在中國,當事人、法院和檢察院都可以成為再審的提出主體。在這個意義上,中國再審中當事人提出再審的部分,與大陸法系國家的再審程序相似。
此外,中國由於自身的政治和歷史問題,國內存在三個特殊的地區,即,香港、澳門和台灣。這三個地區的法律有其自身的特殊性,和中國法有很大差異。
本文通過介紹中國法中的審判監督程序,對中國法的特殊性做出介紹。通過考察中國香港、中國澳門和中國台灣法律中的相關規定,介紹這幾個地區的特殊制度。之後,比較韓國再審程序,為中國法的改善提出思路。
本文的第一章是緒論,陳述了這篇論文的概況。
本文的第二章是審判監督程序的一般論。由於審判監督程序是中國法上的特殊概念,在第二章中,陳述了審判監督程序的概念、意義、和相關主體可以提出審判監督程序的依據。此外,由於中國社會主義國家的國家性質,中國國內還存在審判監督體系,第二章也將審判監督體系與審判監督程序做出了比較。第二章的最後,比較了民事、刑事和行政法中的審判監督程序。
在第三章中,筆者具體地研究了中國的審判監督程序,介紹了可以提出再審的三個主體。當事者依申請提出再審,檢察院依抗訴提出再審,法院以自身決定提出再審。之後,還詳細介紹了再審的審查和審判方法。
本文第四章介紹了中國的香港、澳門和台灣的相關制度。以及對韓國的再審制度做出了考察。這其中,中國香港依據英國法立法,中國澳門依據葡萄牙法立法,這兩個地區的再審制度和中國大陸有顯著不同。中國大陸、中國台灣和韓國由於都受到了大陸法系的影響,再審方面有一定的共同特徵。
在本文的第五章,筆者提出了中國審判監督程序的相關問題,並且提出了改善方案。筆者從理論和具體制度的層面探討了中國的審判監督程序的缺點,並提出了改善方案。
第六章是結論,對中國審判監督程序做出小結。
中國由於自身的國家性質、歷史原因、經濟政治問題,國內的立法體現出十分複雜的情況。不同地區間的法律有所差異,中國大陸自身的法律也體現出社會主義國家理論和大陸法系的影響。這其中,由於自身的複雜性,導致中國法律不夠完善,有時不同的理論之間會有衝突。這個特點在審判監督程序中體現的尤為明顯。本文通過考察中國大陸和特殊地區的法律,考察韓國的法律,對中國審判監督程序做出研究,為以後中國能夠制定出更和諧的法律做出貢獻,也希望可以為不同國家或地區間的法律的相互借鑒和參考做出貢獻。
주제어
#재심 심판감독
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.