$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
안녕하세요!
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

의류상품 유형별 평가기준에 관한 연구(I

'A Study on Clothing Evaluative Criteria of Various Clothing items(I)'

Abstract

The purposes of the study were to define the clothing evaluative criteria concept as an internal evaluative criteria and buying evaluative criteria based on the Engel-Kollot-Blackwell's consumer behavior model, and to explore the differences between internal evaluative criteria and buying evaluative criteria imprically. The study also aimed to find out the differences between internal evaluative criteria and buying evaluative criteria according to clothing items(underwears, pajama, jeans, blouse, two-pieces, coat) The questionnaires were administered to college female students living in Seoul. Means and Standard Deviations were calculated, and Discriminant Analysis were used for statistical inferences. The results were as follows: In underwears, internal evaluative criteria were comfort and fiber, while toying evaluative criteria was color. In pajama, internal evaluative criteria was comfort and fiber, while buying evaluative criteria was good buy. In jean, internal evaluative criteria was fit and suitability to individual, while buying evaluative criteria was suitability to individual and price. In blouse, internal evaluative criteria was beauty and harmony with other clothing. In two-pieces, internal evaluative criteria was color and beauty, while buying evaluative criteria was suitability to individual. In coat, internal evaluative criteria was textile and color. In conclusion, as shown in the results above, the evident differences between internal evaluative criteria and buying evaluative criteria and buying evaluative criteria were testified, therefore evaluative criteria should he defined as internal evaluative criteria and buying evaluative criteria, and study of evaluative criteria should be explored according to clothing items.

저자의 다른 논문

참고문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문의 참고문헌 없음

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (6)

  1. 2000. "A Study on Use and Purchase Behavior of Sleeping wear for Summer in Chungchong area." 한국의류학회지 = Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 24(6): 838~849 
  2. 2001. "Service Dimensions of Apparel Product Salesperson and Importance of Service Dimension by Apparel Product Type" 한국의류학회지 = Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 25(5): 933~944 
  3. 2002. "A Study on the Elderly Women's Clothing Behavior in Underwear" 한국의류학회지 = Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 26(5): 737~747 
  4. 2003. "Clothing Evaluation Criteria and Purchase Intention based on Consumers′ Clothing Shopping Orientation in Cyber Shopping" 한국의류학회지 = Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 27(7): 789~799 
  5. 2003. "Clothing Products Evaluation according to Self-Image and Clothing Attitudes" 한국의류학회지 = Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 27(12): 1424~1433 
  6. Park, Na-Ri ; Park, Jae-Ok 2007. "Evaluation Criteria and Preferred Image of Jeans Products based on Benefit Segmentation" 한국의류학회지 = Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 31(6): 974~984 

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • ScienceON :

원문 URL 링크

원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. (원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기)

상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일