$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
안녕하세요!
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

한국인의 자가평가 건강수준 측정도구(KHP 1.0) 개발

A Trial for Development of Health Profile (KHP 1.0) to Measure the Self-Perceived Health Status of Korean

Abstract

Objectives : The 1990s has seen advances in the conceptualization of self-perceived health status which has important roles for individual health and the quality of life. Many types of standardized questionnaires have been developed with the current wide use of SF-36, NHP, andEuroQol. However, the outcomes of these tools may be different with regard to regional, cultural and emotional backgrounds. The purpose of this study was to trial the development of a Korean Health Profile (KHP 1.0) to measure the self-perceived health stati of Koreans. Methods : The KHP 1.0 was designed on the basis of the Medical Outcome Study Form 36 (SF-36), the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), and the EuroQOL. It was composed of 9 scales; physical functioning, role limitation-physical, pain, general health, energy, social isolation, sleep, role limitation-emotional, and e-motional health. Self-reported chronic disease conditions, and the Zung's Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), were also checked for the evaluation of clinical validity. This study was conducted, from December 2000 to January 2001, on 800 middle-aged parents, with four high school students, with 100 retest sets being conducted two weeks later. From the 800 subjects there were 588 complete responses (effective response 73.5%). The reliability of the test-retest results, and the factor analysis on the validity of the KHP 1.0 components, were evaluated using the SPSS (ver 10.0) software. Results : The reliability of the KHP 1.0 was good with Cronbach's alpha (>0.6), test-retest correlation coefficients (>0.5), but with no significant differences from the paired t-test. From the psychometric validity tests, the 9 scales of the KHP 1.0 were divided into two components; physical and mental, and trimmed to the established model with 55% of the total variance, with the exception of role limitation-emotional. The clinical validity on the basis of the comparison for the four characteristic groups; healthy, physical conditions only, mental conditions only, and physical and mental conditions were also good. Conclusions : The KHP 1.0 appears to be a valid measurement tool of self-perceived health stati of Koreans, although there are limitations, i.e. sample size was too small, a limited number of middle-aged subjects, and it was based on unconfirmed diagnoses, etc. Therefore, further study is required to standardize the assessment.

저자의 다른 논문

참고문헌 (54)

  1. Landgraf JM, Nelson EC. Summaryof the WONCA/COOP International Health Assessment Field Trial. The Dartmouth COOP Primary Care Network. Aust Fam Physician 1992; 21(3): 255-7, 260-2, 266-269 
  2. Gandek B, Ware JE Jr, Aaronson NK, Alonso J, Apolone G, BjornerJ, BrazierJ, Bullinger M, FukuharaS, KaasaS, Leplege A, Sullivan M.Testsof data quality,scaling assumptions, and reliability of the SF-36 in eleven countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment 
  3. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, McHorney CA, Rogers WH, Raczek A. Comparison of methods for the scoringand statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: Med Care 1995; 33(4Suppl): AS264-279 
  4. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. TheMOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and itemselection. MedCare 1992 Jun; 30(6):473-483 
  5. Carr-Hill RA. Healthrelated qualityof life measurement--Euro style. Health Policy 1992; 20(3): 321-8;discussion 329-332 
  6. Dolan P. Search for a critical appraisal of EuroQol: a response by the EuroQol group to Gafni and Birch. Health Policy 1994; 28(1): 676-679 
  7. Ho Seong Moon, Seung Yong Shin, Yeon Su Lee, Ki Woo Kwak. Effectiveness of Korean Version of the Nottingham Health Profile. J Korean Acad Fam Med 1993; 14(11): 699-708 (Korean) 
  8. Ruffing-Rahal MA, Barin LJ, Combs CJ. Gender role orientation as a correlate of perceived health, health behavior, and qualitative well-being in older women. J WomenAging 1998; 10(1): 3-19 
  9. Cockerham WC, Sharp K, Wilcox JA. Aging and perceived health status. J Gerontal 1983; 38(3): 349-355 
  10. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, McHorney CA, Rogers WH, Raczek A. Comparison of methods for the scoringand statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1995 Apr; 33(4 Suppl): AS264-279 
  11. Lowe NK, Ryan-Wenger NM. Beyond Campbell and Fiske: assessment of convergent and discriminant validity. Res Nurs Health 1992 Feb; 15(1):67-75. Review 
  12. Li J, Fielding R. The measurement of current perceived health among Chinese people in Guangzhou and Hong Kong, southern China. Qual Life Res 1995; 4(3): 271-278 
  13. Perneger TV, Leplege A, Etter JF, Rougemont A. Validation of a Frenchlanguage version of the MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in young healthy adults. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48(8): 105I-1060 
  14. Stewart AL.,Ware JE. Measuring funcitonng and Well-being: The Medical Outcome Study Approach. Durham, NC: Duke university Press 1992 
  15. Persson LO, Karlsson J, Bengtsson C, Steen B, Sullivan M. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey II. Evaluation of clinical validity: results from population studies of elderly and women in Gothenborg. J Clin Epidemiol 1998 Nov; 5I(1I): 1095-1 103 
  16. Jylha M, Leskinen E, Alanen E, Leskinen AL, Heikkinen E. Self-rated health and associated factors among men of different ages. J Gerontol 1986; 41(6): 710-717 
  17. URL:http://www.st-36.com 
  18. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE.The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993; 31(3):247-263 
  19. Hoeymans N, Feskens EJ, van den Bos GA, Kromhout D. Age, time, and cohort effects on functional status and self-rated health in elderly men. Am J Public Health 1997; 87(10): 1620-1625 
  20. Ware JE, Comments on the Use of Health Status Assessment in Clinical Settings, Med Care 1992; 30(5), Supplement 
  21. Ferketich SL, Figueredo AJ, Knapp TR. The multitrait-multimethod approach to construct validity. Res Nurs Health 1991; 14(4): 315-320 
  22. The EuroQol Group, EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of healthrelated quality of life. Health Policy 1990 Dec; 16(3): 199-208 
  23. Sang Baek Koh, Sei Jin Chang, Myung Geun Kang, Bong Suk Cha, Jong Ku Park. Reliability and validity on measurement instruments for health status assessment in occupational workers. Korean J Prev Med 1997; 30(2): 251-266(Korean) 
  24. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Rogers W, Raczek AE, Lu JF. The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and longform health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1992; 30(5 Suppl): MS253-265 
  25. Hoeymans N, Feskens EJ, Kromhout D, van den Bos GA. Ageing and the relationship between functional status and selfrated health in elderly men. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45(10): 1527-1536 
  26. Parkerson GR Jr, Broadhead WE, Tse CK. The Duke Health Profile. A 17-item measure of health and dysfunction. Med Care 1990; 28(11): 1056-72 
  27. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr. Construction and validation of an alternate form general mental health scale for the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey. Med Care 1995; 33(1): 1528 
  28. Gande kB, Ware JE,J ClinEpidemiol 1998 40. BrazierJ, Usherwood T, HarperR, Thomas K. Deriving a preference-based single indexfrom the UK SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51(11): 1115-1128 
  29. Wagner AK, Gandek B, Aaronson NK, Acquadro C, Alonso J, Apolone G, Bullinger M,BjornerJ, Fukuhara S, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Sullivan M, WoodDauphinee S, Ware JE Jr. Cross-cultural comparisons of the content of SF-36 translations across 10 countries. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51(11): 9259-9262 
  30. Krause NM, Jay GM. What do global selfrated health items measure? Med Care 1994; 32(9): 930-942 
  31. Dorman PJ, Waddell F, Slattery J, Dennis M, Sandercock P. Is the EuroQol a valid measure of health-related quality of life after stroke? Stroke. 1997 Oct; 28(10): 1876-1882 
  32. Carlson P. Self-perceived health in East and West Europe: another European health divide. Soc Sci Med 1998; 46(10): 1355-1366 
  33. Mangione CM, Seddon JM, Cook EF, Krug JH Jr, Sahagian CR, Campion EW, Glynn RJ. Correlates of cognitive function scores in elderly outpatients. JAm Geriatr Soc 1993; 41(5): 491-497 
  34. FukuharaS, WareJE Jr, Kosinski M, Wada S, Gandek B. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity of the Japanese SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1998 ; 51(11): 1045-1053 
  35. Parkerson GR Jr, Willke RJ, Hays RD. An international comparison of the reliability and responsiveness of the Duke Health Profilefor measuring health-related quality of life of patientstreatedwith alprostadil for erectile dysfunction. Med Care 1999; 37(1): 56-67 
  36. Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, ArgyleM. The Nottingham Health Profile: an analysis of its sensitivity in differentiating illness groups. Soc Sci Med 1988; 27(12): 1411-1414 
  37. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: developmentand final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 1981; 19(8): 787-805 
  38. Mangione CM, Seddon JM, Cook EF, Krug JH Jr, Sahagian CR, Campion EW, Glynn RJ. Correlates of cognitive function scores in elderly outpatients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993; 4(5): 491-497 
  39. Hall JA, Epstein AM, McNeil BJ. Multidimensionality of health status in an elderly population. Construct validity of a measurement battery. Med Care 1989; 27(3 Suppl): 168-177 
  40. Ware JE Jr , Hays RD. Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters. Med Care 1988; 26(4): 393-402 
  41. Sung Hee Lee, Ester Lyuh, Tai Woo Yoo. Studyfor development of korean version of COOP/WONCA charts. J Korean Acad Fam Med 1995; 16(10): 684-691 (Korean) 
  42. Apolone G, Mosconi P. The Italian SF-36 Health Survey: translation, validation and norming. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51(11): 1025-1036 
  43. Holmes We. A short, psychiatric, casefinding measure for HIV seropositive outpatients: performance characteristics of the 5-itemmental healthsubscale of the SF20 in a male, seropositive sample. Med Care 1998; 36(2): 237-243 
  44. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, Backett EM, Williams J, Papp E. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1980; 34(4): 281-286 
  45. Ware JE. Measuring patients' views: the optimum outcome measure. BMJ 1993 ; 29; 306(6890): 1429-1430 
  46. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993; 31(3): 247-263 
  47. Gande KB, WareJE, J Clin Epidemiol 1998 
  48. Stronks K, van de Mheen H, van den Bos J, Mackenbach JP. The interrelationship between income, health and employment status. Int J Epidemiol 1997; 26(3): 592-600 
  49. Fielding R, Li J. Avalidation ofthe concept of current perceived health and the Current Perceived Health-42 (CPH-42) questionnaire. Qual Life Res 1997; 6(1): 35-42 
  50. Brazier J, Usherwood T, Harper R, Thomas K. Deriving a preference-based single indexfrom the UK SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51(11): 1115-1128 
  51. 이홍재. 일부농촌과 도시 거주민의 보건행태의 차이에 관한연구, 서울대학교보건대학원 석사논문, 1994 
  52. Shadbolt B. Some correlates of self-rated health for Australian women. Am J Public Health 1997; 87(6): 951-956 
  53. Jenkinson C. Why are we weighting? A critical examination of the use of item weights in a health status measure. Soc Sci Med 1991; 32(12): 1413-1416 
  54. Berwick OM. Controlling variation in health care: a consultation from Walter Shewhart. Med Care 1991; 29(12): 1212-1225 

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (2)

  1. Choi, Ryoung ; Moon, Hyun-Ju 2011. "A Study on Influential Determinants of Health in Adult of Korea Using Lalonde Health Field Model" 보건의료산업학회지 = The Korean journal of health service management, 5(2): 77~89 
  2. Hong, Min-Hee ; Jung, Moon-Hee 2011. "A Study on the Level of Self-assessed Oral Health by the Adults" 치위생과학회지= Journal of dental hygiene science, 11(3): 265~272 

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • ScienceON :

원문 URL 링크

원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. (원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기)

상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일