• 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보


Objectives : This study aimed to develop an evaluation protocol of disability weights using person trade-off, and to test the reliability of the developed protocol in a Korean context. Methods : To develop the valuation protocol, the Global Burden of Disease(GBD) and the Dutch studies were replicated and modified. Sixteen indicator conditions were selected from the Korean version of disease classification, which was based on that of the GBD Study, and the person trade-off method referred to the Dutch method. Results : The disability weights were valued in a two step panel sfudy. The first step was a carefully designed group process by three panels, using person trade-off to establish the disability weights for sixteen selected indicator conditions. The second step consisted of interpolation of the remaining diseases, on a disability scale, by the individual members of three panels. The members of three panels were all medical doctors, with sufficient knowledge of the consequences of a broad variety of diseases. The internal consistency of the Korean disability weights was satisfactory. Considerable agreement existed within each panel and among the panels. Conclusions : It was feasible to use a modified evaluation protocol from those used in GBD and Dutch studies, This would provide a rational basis for an international comparative study of disability weights.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 한국보건의료관리연구원. 질병부담 추정에 관한기초연구 1998 
  2. 최용준. 건강생활년을 이용한 우리 나라 주요 암 질환의 질병부담 측정. 서울대학교 대학원 의학석사 학위논문. 2002 
  3. Nord E. The PTO approach to valuing health care programs. Med Decis Making 1995; 15: 201-208 
  4. Murray CJL, Lopez AD. The Global Burden of Disease: A comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries and risk factors in 1990 and projectedto 2020.WHO. 1996 
  5. Mathers CD, Vos T, Lopez AD, Salomon J, Ezzati M. National Burden of Disease Studies: A Practical Guide, Edition 2.0. WHO. 2001 
  6. Stoudhard MEA. Disability weights for diseases: A modified protocol and results for a Western European region. Eur J Public Health 2000; 10: 24-30 
  7. Stoudhard MEA, Essink-Bot ML, Bonsel GJ, Kramers PGN, van de Water HPA, Gunning-Schepers LJ, van de Maas PJ. Disability weights for diseases in the Netherlands. 1997 
  8. Yoon SJ, Kwon YD, Kim BY. Estimate the disability weight of major cancers in Korea using Delphi methods. Korea J Prev Med 2000; 33(4): 409-414 (Korean) 
  9. 조희숙,성주헌,최인정,이태진,김재용,송윤미,정은경,신해림,신영수. 한국질병체계 분류에 의한 사망손실연수의 평가. 대한예방의학회 추계학술대회 2001 
  10. 한국질병부담측정 연구팀. 질병부담연구 및 보건의료체계성과에 대한 세미나. 2002년 3월 
  11. 김성숙,김양분. 일반화가능도 이론. 교육과학사; 2001(7-59쪽) 
  12. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measure-ment Scale : A practical guide to their development and use, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001. p. 104-143 
  13. Froberg DG, Kane RL. Methodology for Measuring Health-State Preferences I: Measurement Strategies. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42(4): 345-354 
  14. Froberg DG, Kane RL. Methodology for Measuring Health-State Preferences II : Scaling Methods. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42(5): 459-471 
  15. Kaplan RM, Ernst JA. Do Category Rating Scales Produce Biased Preference Weights for a Health Index. Med Care 1983; 21: 193-207 
  16. Torrance GW. Measurement of Health-State Utilities for Economic Appraisal: a Review. J Health Econ 1986; 5: 1-30 
  17. Patrick DL, Bush JW, Chen MM. Methods for Measuring Levels of Well-Being for a Health Status Index. Health Serv Res 1973; 8(3): 228-245 
  18. Essink-Bot ML, Pereira J, Packer C, Schwarzinger M, Burstrom K, the European Disability Weights Group. Cross-national comparability of burden of disease estimates:the European Disability Weights Project. Bull World Health Organ 2002; 80(8): 644-652 
  19. Ustun TB, Rehm'J, Chatterji S, Saxena S, Trotter R, Room R, Bickenbach J and the WHO/NIH Joint Project CAR Study Group. Multiple-informant ranking of the disabling effects of different health conditions in 14 countries. Lancet 1999 Jul 10;354(9173): 111-115 
  20. Anand S, Hanson K. Disability-adjusted life years: a critical review. J Health Econ 1997; 16: 685-702 
  21. Arnesen T, Nord E. The value of DALY life: problems with ethics and validity of disability adjusted life years. BMJ 1999; 319: 1423-1425 
  22. Mansley EC, Elbasha EH. Preferences and person trade-offs: forcing consistency or inconsistency in health-related quality of life measures? Health Econ 2003; 12: 187-198 
  23. European Disability Weights Study. Facilitator instructions and maual. 2000 
  24. Froberg DG, Kane RL. Methodology for Measuring Health-State Preferences lll : Population and Context Effects. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42(6): 585-592 
  25. Froberg DG, Kane RL. Methodology for Measuring Health-State Preferences V : Progress and Research Agenda. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42(7): 675-685 
  26. Ubel PA, Richardson J, Menzel P. Societal Value, the Person Trade-Off, and the Dilemma of Whose Values to Measure for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Health Econ 2000; 9: 127-136 
  27. Cronbach LJ, Gieser GC, Nanda H, Rajartnam N. The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1972. p. 1-14 
  28. Keppel G. Design and Analysis: A Researcher' s Handbook, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc; 1991. p. 188-202 
  29. Crick JE, Brennan RL. GENOVA: A Generalized Analysis of Variance System(FORTRAN IV computer program and manual). Dochester, Mass.: Computer Facilities, University of Massachusetts at Boston, 1982 

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (1)

  1. Kim, Hyun-Jin ; Yoon, Seok-Jun ; Kim, Hyeong-Su ; Lee, Kun-Sei ; Kim, Eun-Jung ; Jo, Min-Woo ; Oh, In-Hwan 2011. "" 韓國環境保健學會誌 = Journal of environmental health sciences, 37(5): 387~395 


원문 PDF 다운로드

  • ScienceON :

원문 URL 링크

원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. (원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기)

상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

이 논문과 연관된 기능

DOI 인용 스타일