$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
안녕하세요!
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

환경 오염으로 인한 인체 위해도에 입각한 사망 손실 비용 추정에 관한 연구

Risk-Based Damage Cost Estimation on Mortality Due to Environmental Problems

Abstract

Objectives : To estimate the value of statistical life (VSL) and health damage cost on theoretical mortality estimates due to environmental pollution. Methods : We assessed the health risk on three environmental problems and eight sub-problems. Willingness to pay (WTP) was elucidated from a questionnaire survey with dichotomous contingent valuation method and VSL (which is the division of WTP by the change of risk reduction) calculated from WTP. Damage costs were estimated by multiplying VSL by the theoretical mortality estimates. Results : VSLs from death caused by air pollution, indoor air pollution and drinking water contamination were about 0.3, 0.5 and 0.3 billion won, respectively. Damage costs of particulate matters ($PM_{10}$) and radon were higher in the sub-problems and were above 100 billion won. Because damage cost depends on theoretical mortality estimate and WTP, its uncertainty is reduced in the estimating process. Conclusion : Health damage cost or risk benefit should be considered as one scientific criterion for decision making in environmental policy.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. US EPA. Guideline for preparing economic analysis. Office of the Administrator, September, EPA-240-R-00-003. 2000 
  2. Tietenberg T. Environmental and natural resource economics. Addison-Wesley Longman, 2000 
  3. Institute of Environmental Research, Yonsei University. Study on the radionuelides concentrations in ground water. National Institute of Environmental Research, 2002 
  4. US EPA. Integrated Risk Information System(lRlS). National Center for Environmental Assessment. URL; http://www.epa.gov/ncea/. zoo; 
  5. European Commission. Externalities of Energy. General? Science, Research and Development, European Commission. 1997 
  6. Jones-Lee MW. The value of safety: Result of a national sample survey. Economic J. 1985; 95: 49-72 
  7. Dong Chun Shin. Comparison of direct and indirect approach for estimating average daily dose of dioxins in Korea. Organohalogan Compounds 2001; 52: 325-329 (korean) 
  8. Institute of Environmental Research, Yonsei University. Making healthy home in Korea. Ministry of Health and Welfare, 2001 
  9. Leigh W. Compensating wages, value of a statistical life and inter-industry differentials. JEEM1995; 28: 83-97 
  10. US EPA. Estimates of willingness to pay for pollution-induced changes in morbidity : A critique for benefit-cost analysis of pollution regulation, 1984 
  11. Pearce DW, Howarth A. Technical Report on Methodology: Costbenefit analysis and policy responses, RlVM,2000 
  12. Institute for Environmental Research, Yonsei Univ. Risk Assessment and Management of Environmental Pollutants System Development for Integrated Risk Assessment of Environmental Pollutants. Ministry of Environmental, Korea (1998 -2001) 
  13. Oh Sang Kwon, Environmental Econorrllcs. Pakyoungsa.I999 
  14. Kwang Sik Choi. A Study on the Evaluation of Monetary Value of Radiation Dose for the Nuclear Regulatory Analysis in Korea. A thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Dept. of Nuclear Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology. 2001 (korean) 
  15. Ye Shin Kim.A Study on Development of Comparative Risk Analysis System for Priority of Environmental Problems in Seoul, Korea. A thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Dept. of Public Health, Yousei University. 2002 (korean) 
  16. Institute for Environmental Research, Yonsei Univ. Risk Assessment and Management of Environmental Pollutants Health Risk Assessment and Management of Water Pollutants. Ministry of Environmental, Korea (1992-1995) 
  17. US EPA. Regional and State Planning Branch, A Guidebook to Comparing Risks and Setting Environmental Priorities, Washington D.C, 1993 
  18. Ministry of Environment, Korea. Air pollution monitoring network, http:// www.me.go.kr, 2001 
  19. Institute for Environmental Research, Yonsei Univ. Risk Assessment and Management of Environmental Pollutants Health Risk Assessment and Management of Air Pollutants. Ministry of Environmental, Korea (1995-1998) 
  20. Institute of Environmental Research, Yonsei University. Advanced disinfection techniques and control disinfection byproducts. National Institute of Environmental Research, 2002 
  21. Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety. Assessment of Radiation Risk for the Korean Population and Nationwide Indoor Radon Survey in Korea. 2002 
  22. U.S EPA. Statistical analysis of hazardous air pollutant concentrations fromhazardous waste combustors, Washington D.C,1996 
  23. Krupnick A, Alberini A, Cropper M, Simon N, 0' Brien B, Goeree R, Heintzelman M. Age, Health, and the Willingness to Pay for Mortality Risk Reduction : A Contingent Valuation Survey of Ontario Residents. Resource FortheFuture, 2000 
  24. National Research Council. Health effects of exposure to Radon (HEIR W). WashingtonD. C,National Academy Press, 1999 
  25. Pope CA III, Burnett RT, Thun MJ, Calle EE, Krewski D, Ito K. Thurston G.D. Lung cancer. cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-tehn exposure to fine particulate air pollution,JAMA, 2002; 287(9): 1132-1141 

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (1)

  1. Kim Ye-Shin ; Lee Yong-Jin ; Shin Dong-Chun 2004. "Selection of Priority Areas Based on Human and Economic Risk from Exposure to Fine Particles in Seoul" 환경독성학회지 = Journal of environmental toxicology, 19(1): 49~58 

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • ScienceON :

원문 URL 링크

원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. (원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기)

상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일