• 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

수종 치과용 석고의 접촉각 및 젖음성에 관한 비교 연구



The purpose of this study was to investigate the contact angles and wettability of conventional dental stones and improved dental stones and newly developed dental stones on several impression materials. Materials included in this study were several dental stones and newly developed dental stone ; 2 type III stones (Snow Rock, New Diastone), 6 type IV stones(Crystal Rock, Vel Mix, Fuji Rock, Tuff Rock, Resin Rock and newly developed dental stone) and 1 type V stone (Die Keen). Contact angles on the impression materials were measured with contact angle measuring device. Ten specimens for each material, total 180 specimens were made on void entrapment model. The two impression materials (Handae, GC) were used to produce 9 groups of die stone casts form void entrapment model. Voids in the stone casts were counted under a stereoscopic microscope. The grad for the reproduction ability of each materials on the void entrapment model was calculated from the casts by one examiner. From the experiment, the following results were obtained : 1. The newly developed stones showed smallest contact angle. Type III dental stone had larger contact angles than type IV and V stones. Contact angle was much affected by the impression materials. 2. Resin containing die materials such as Tuff Rock and Resin Rock had smallest void number than any other groups. 3. In comparing reproduction parameters, Tuff Rock and Resin Rock presented superior results, while Vel Mix showed lowest reproduction ability.

저자의 다른 논문

참고문헌 (22)

  1. American Dental Association. Specification No. 25 for dental gypsum products In: Certification program for dental materials. Chicago: American Dental Association;1990;p.1-14 
  2. Peyton FA, Leibld JP, Ridgley GV. Surface hardness. compressive strength and abrasion resistance of indirect die stone. J Prosthet Dent 1952;2:381-9 
  3. Schneider RL, Taylor TD. Compressive strength and surface hardness of type IV die stone when mixed with water substitutes. J Prosthetic Dent 1984;52:510-4 
  4. Earnshaw R. Improvement in the properties of gypsum casts by polymer impregnation. Aust Dent J 1976;21:160-4 
  5. Schwedhelm ER, Lepe X. Fracture strength of Type IV and Type V die stone as a function of time. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:554-9 
  6. Paquette JM, Taniguchi T, White SN. Dimensional accuracy of an epoxy resin die material using two setting methods. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:301-5 
  7. Ragain JC, Grosko ML, Raj M, et al. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations. lnt J Prosthodont 2000;13:214-20 
  8. Duke PD, Moore BK, Haug SP, Andres CJ. Study of the physical properties of type IV gypsum, resin-containing and epoxy die materials. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:466-73 
  9. Pratten DH, Craig RG. Wettability of a hydrophilic addition silicone impression material. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:197-202 
  10. Cullen DR, Mikesell JW, Sandrik JL. Wettability fo elastomeric impression materials and voids in gypsum casts. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:261-5 
  11. Waters MG, Jagger RC, Jerolimov V, Williams KR. Wettability of denture soft lining materials. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:644-6 
  12. Pratten DH, Covey DA, Sheats RD. Effect of disinfectant solutions on the wettability of elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:223-7 
  13. Young-il Oh, Kyung-A, Han, Kyung-Ho Chung, Kyung Nam Kim, Lee-Ra Cho. Fundamental study for developing silicone rubber impression material. Elastomer 2000;35:19-28 
  14. Lee-Ra Cho, Kyung-Ho Chung, Kyung Nam Kim. Wettability of polyvinylsiloxane impression materials and improved stone materials. J Kor Acad Prosthodont 2000;38:191-9 
  15. Panichuttra R, Jones RM, Goodacre C, Munoz CA. Hydrophilic poly(vinyl siloxane)impression materials: dimensional accuracy, wettability, and effect on gypsum hardness. lnt J Prosthodont 1991;4:240-8 
  16. Lee-Ra Cho, Kyung-Ho Chung, Kyung Nam Kim. Wettability and void formationof newly developed polyvinylsiloxane impression materials. J Kor Dent Asso 2003;41:35-41 
  17. Craig RG. Restorative dental materials. ninth edition. 1993, USA, Mosby 
  18. Nomura GT, Reisbick MH, Preston JD. An investigation of epoxy resin dies. J Prosthet Dent 1980;44:45-50 
  19. Vermilyea SG, HYget LF, Wiskoski J. Evaluation of resin die materials. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:304-307 
  20. Moser JB, Stone DG, Willougby GM. Properties of a resin die material. J Prosthet Dent 1975;34:297-304 
  21. Chaffee HR, Bailey JH, Sherrad DJ. Dimensional accuracy of improved dental stone, epoxy resin die materials Part II ; Complete arch form. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:235-238 
  22. Hye-won Shim, Yang-Jin Yi, Lee-Ra Cho, Kyung-Ho Chung, Kyung Nam Kim. A study on the abrasion resistance and surface roughness of the dental stones. J Korean Res Soc Dent Mater 2002;40:184-92 

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음


원문 PDF 다운로드

  • ScienceON :

원문 URL 링크

원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. (원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기)

상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

DOI 인용 스타일