$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

MACRO-SHEAR BOND STRENGTH AND MICRO-SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF CEROMER BONDED TO METAL ALLOY AND FIBER REINFORCED COMPOSITE 원문보기

대한치과보철학회지 = The journal of Korean academy of prosthodontics, v.42 no.6, 2004년, pp.654 - 663  

Park Hyung-Yoon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry and Research Institute of Oral Science, Kangnung National University) ,  Cho Lee-Ra (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry and Research Institute of Oral Science, Kangnung National University) ,  Cho Kyung-Mo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry and Research Institute of Oral Science, Kangnung National University) ,  Park Chan-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry and Research Institute of Oral Science, Kangnung National University)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Statement of problem. According to the fracture pattern in several reports, fractures most frequently occur in the interface between the ceromer and the substructure. Purpose. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the macro shear bond strength and microshear bond strength of a ceromer bonded...

주제어

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper 아이콘 AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

제안 방법

  • After testing, all the specimens were examined using a stereomicroscope (SZH-ILLB, Olympus Optical Co., Tokyo, Japan) at x 10 magnification to analyze the pattern of failure. The fracture mod啓 \yere divided into the adhesive fracture and cohesive fracture groups.
  • Cylinders of the dental composite resin were bonded to a prepared substructure surface, the macro-shear and micro-shear was tested at a specified rate, and the interfacial bond strengths were calculated.
  • These results are consistent with the rank of the micro-shear strength found in this study. Overall, although the bond strength of the veneer and the substructures differed according to the testing conditions, the test method would also affect the data according to the results of this study.
  • The latter was classified as a fracture in the veneer material or in the substructures. Subsequently, the fracture surface of the specimens was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEMZ LEO 420; LEO LTD, Cambrige, UK) to investigate the surface morphology at the failure site.
  • manufacturer. The FRC specimens received a coating of a wetting agent (Vectris wetting agent; Ivoclar, Schaan, Liechtenstein) with a single brush application, which was allowed to dry for 1 minute.
  • The limitation of this study was the fact that a static test was performed in a dry environment. Water would be constantly present in the actual oral environment which would undergo repeated temperature and pH changes.
  • Therefore, the main purpose of this experiment was to compare the macro-shear bond strengths and the micro-shear bond strengths of the ceromer bonded to the metal alloy surfaces and FRC surface.

대상 데이터

  • All the wax specimens were invested under vacuum with a complete investment (Micro-Fine 1700, Talladium, Valencia, USA). After burnout at the temperatures specified by the manufacturer, the specimens were centrifugally cast in metal alloys according to the manufacturer' s instructions; Co-Cr alloy (Biosil, Degussa Dental, Postfach, Germany), Ni-Cr alloy (Rexillium DI, Pentronz Wallingford, USA) and type II gold alloy (A48; AlphaDent, Seoul, Korea). The alloy was melted with a gas-oxygen multi-orifice torch.

데이터처리

  • When the differences were significant, a multiple comparison test was performed using the Scheffe's method. Statistical analyses within the groups with regard to the test methods (macro- and micro- shear strength) were made using Student's t-test. The results of the fracture patterns of each group were analyzed with nonparametric chi-square test.
  • The macro- and micro-shear strengths were analyzed using one-way ANOVA to determine if significant differences existed at the 95% confidence level. When the differences were significant, a multiple comparison test was performed using the Scheffe's method.
  • Statistical analyses within the groups with regard to the test methods (macro- and micro- shear strength) were made using Student's t-test. The results of the fracture patterns of each group were analyzed with nonparametric chi-square test.
  • When the differences were significant, a multiple comparison test was performed using the Scheffe's method. Statistical analyses within the groups with regard to the test methods (macro- and micro- shear strength) were made using Student's t-test.
본문요약 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Touati B, Aidan N. Second generation laboratory composite resin for indirect restorations. J Esthet Dent 1997;9:108-18 

  2. Gohring TN, Mormann WH, Lutz F. Clinical and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of fiber reinforced inlay fixed partial dentures: Preliminary results after one year. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:662-8 

  3. Altieri JV, Burstone CJ, Goldberg AJ, Patel AP. Longitudinal clinical evaluation of fiber-rein-forced composite fixed partial dentures: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:16-22 

  4. Krejci I, Boretti R, Lutz F, Giezendanner P. Adhesive crowns and fixed partial dentures of optimized composite resin with glass fiber-bonded framework. Quint Dent Tech 1999;22:107-27 

  5. Choi NJ, Vang MS.The effects of metal surface treat-ment on bond strength between resin and metal in-terface of resin veneerd crown. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1994;34:471-83 

  6. Martin J, LeBeau S. The best of both worlds: combining metal and ceromer for clinical success. Dent Today 2000;19:88-9 

  7. Almilhatti HJ, Giampaolo ET, Vergani CE, Machado AL, Pavarina AC. Shear bond strength of aesthetic materials bonded to Ni-Cr alloy. J Dent 2003;31:205-11 

  8. Freilich MA, Meiers JC, Duncan JP, Eckrote KA, Goldberg AJ. Clinical evaluation of fiber-rein-forced fixed bridges. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:1524-34 

  9. Monaco C, Ferrari M, Miceli GP, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced composite inlay FPDs. Int J Prothodon 2003;16:319-325 

  10. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Handel G. Fiber-reinforced composite crowns and FPDs: a clinical report. Int J Prothodont 2003;16;239-43 

  11. Cesar PF, Meyer Faara PM, Miwa Caldart R, Gastaldoni Jaeger R, da Cunha Ribeiro F. Tensile bond strength of composite repairs on artglass using different surface treatments. Am J Dent 2001;14:373-7 

  12. Craig RG.. Powers J M. Restorative dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby 2002 54-71 

  13. Nakamura T, Waki T, Kinuta S, Tanaka H. Strength and elastic modulus of fiber-reinforced composite used for fabrication FPDs. Int J Prothodont 2003;16:549-53 

  14. Chang JC, Koh SH, Powers JM, Duong JH. Tensile bond strength of composite to gold-palladium alloy after thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:271-6 

  15. Rothfuss LG, Hokett SD, Hondrum SO, Elrod CW. Resin to metal bond strength using two commercial systems. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:270-2 

  16. Czerw RJ, Wakefield CW, Robbins JW, Fulkerson MS. Shear bond strength of composite resin to microetched metal with five newer-generation bonding agent. Oper Dent 1995;20:58-62 

  17. Smith RM, Barrett MG, Gardner WA, Marshall T, Mclean MJ, McMichael DW, Yerbury PJ,Rawls HR. Effect of environmental stress and surface treatment on resin-to-metal bonding. Am J Dent 1993;6:111-5 

  18. Kim JY, Pfeiffer P, Niedermeier W. Effect of laboratory procedures and thermocycling on the shear bond strength of resin metal bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:184-9 

  19. Pesun S, Mazurat RD. Bond strength of acrylic resin to cobalt-ehromium alloy treated with the Silicoater MD and Kevloc systems. J Can Dent Assoc 1998; 64:798-802 

  20. Yoon DJ, Shin SW, Lim HN, Suh KW. A study of the bond strength of reinforced indirect composite resins to dental alloys.J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1999;37:620-39 

  21. McDonough WG, Antonucci JM, He J, Shimada Y, Chiang MY, Schumacher GE, Schultheisz CR. A microshear test to measure bond strengths of dentin polymer interfaces. Biomaterials 2002;23:3603-8 

  22. Tantbirojn D, Cheng YS, Versluis A, Hodges JS, Douglas WH. Nominal shear or fracture mechanics in the assessment of composite-dentin adhesion? J Dent Res 2000;79:41-48 

  23. Laufer B, Nicholls J, Townsend J. SiOx-C coating: A composit-to-metal bonding mechanism. J Prothet Dent 1988;60:320-7 

  24. Rubo JH, Pegoraro LF, Ferreira PM. A comparison of tensile bond strengths of resin-retained prostheses made using five alloys. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:277-81 

  25. Cho L, Song H, Koak J, Heo S. Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of ceromer/fiber-reinforced composite crowns: effect of variations in preparation design. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:388-95 

  26. Song HY, Yi YJ, Cho LR, Park DY. Effects of two preparation designs and pontic distance on bend-ing and fracture strength of fiber-reinforced composite inlay fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:347-53 

  27. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 1990;69:1652-8 

  28. Lastumaki TM, Kallio TT, Vallittu PK. The bond strength of light curing composite resin to finally polymerized and aged glass fiber-reinforced composite substrate. Biomaterials 2002;23:4533-9 

관련 콘텐츠

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로