Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show the process of R&D Project-Priority Ordering in the Defense Technology field. We propose specific methods (Delphi, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Scoring) to order the R&D Project-Priority. In general, to decide the priority of R&D projects most of researches depend on questionnaires which are surveyed by experts. However, it is criticized that this process cannot reflect the limitation of experience and knowledge of experts. In this process, we separate evaluators in two parts: the first is strategic experts, the second is technical experts. Evaluators can choose and evaluate the alternatives which they are familiar with, so we can obtain reliable results. Finally, based on our process of the R&D Project-Priority Ordering we formulate policy implications for managing the defense technology.

주제어

#연구개발 우선순위 설정   #전문가 선택 과제평가시스템  

저자의 다른 논문

참고문헌 (8)

1. Pohekar, S. D., and Ramachandran, M., 'Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning - A review,' Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 8, 2004. pp.365-381 
2. 정혜순 외, '기술가치평가연구,' 한국과학기술정보연구원, 2002 
3. Saaty, T. L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980 
4. Johnson et al, New Challenges New Tools for Dense Decisionmaking, Rand, 2003, pp. 339-359 
5. 김훈철 외, '기술지도플 활용한 국가연구개발 목표설정 및 자원배분 방안', 국가과학기술자문회의, 1999 
6. Keeney, R. L., Decisions with Multiple Objectives, New York: Wiley, 1976 
7. Souder W. E., Managing New Product Innovations, Lexington Books, 1987 
8. Haapalinna, I., 'How to allocate funds within the army', European Journal of Operational Research，Vol.144, 2003. pp.224-223 

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (1)

1. Yang, Sung-Byung ; Koh, Joon 2008. "Application of Knowledge Management to Defense Organizations: Issues and Implications" 한국국방경영분석학회지 = Journal of the Military Operations Research Society of Korea, 34(1): 99~115  원문보기 상세보기