• 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보


Although automated continuous-monitoring blood culture systems are both rapid and sensitive, false-positive and false-negative results still occur. The objective of this study, then, was to evaluate negative results occurring with BacT/Alert 3D blood culture systems. A total of 1032 samples were cultured with the BacT/Alert 3D automated blood culture system, using both aerobic (BPA) and anaerobic (BPN) media, and 128 of these samples yielded positive results. A total of 904 negative blood samples were then subcultured in $5\%$ sheep blood agar, eosin methylene blue, chocolate agar, and sabouraud-dextrose agar. Organisms growing on these subcultures were subsequently identified using both Vitek32 (bioMerieux, Durham, NC) and conventional methods. Twenty four $(2.6\%)$ of the 904 subcultures grew on the subculture media. The majority $(83.3\%)$ of these were determined to be gram-positive microorganisms. Fourteen $(58.3\%)$ were coagulase-negative staphylococci, two $(8.3\%)$ were Bacillus spp., one $(4.2\%)$ was Staphylococcus aureus, and one $(4.2\%)$ was identified as Enterococcus faecium. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Neisseria spp. were isolated together in two $(8.3\%)$ vials. Gram-negative microorganisms comprised $12.5\%$ of the subcultures, of which two $(8.3\%)$ were found to be Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and one $(4.2\%)$ was Pseudomonas fluorescens. The other isolate $(4.2\%)$ was identified as Candida albicans. We conclude that the subculture of negative results is valuable in the BacT/Alert 3D system, especially in situations in which only one set of blood cultures is taken.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. Araj, G.F., R.L. Hopfer, M. Wenglar, and V. Fainstein. 1981. Valuable of terminal subcultures from negative BACTEC blood culture bottles. J. Clin. Microbiol. 14, 589-590 
  2. Campbell, J. and J.A. Washington, 2nd. 1980. Evaluation of the necessity for routine terminal subcultures of previously negative blood cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 12. 576-578 
  3. Horvath, L.L., B.J. George, C.K., Murray, L.S. Harrison, and D.R. Hospenthal. 2004. Direct comparison of the BACTEC 9240 and BacT/Alert3D automated blood culture systems for candida growth detection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42, 115-118 
  4. Shigei, J.T., J.A. Shimabukuro, M.T. Pezzlo, L.M. de la Maza, and E.M. Peterson. 1995. Value of terminal subcultures for blood cultures monitored by BACTEC 9240. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33, 1385-1388 
  5. Seegmuller, I., U. Eschenbach, K. Kamereck, and T. Miethke. 2004. Sensitivity of the BacT/Alert FA-medium for detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in pre-incubated blood cultures and its temperature-dependence. J. Med. Microbiol. 53, 869-874 
  6. Hardy, D.J., B.B. Hulbert, and P.C. Migneault. 1992. Time to detection of positive BacT/Alert blood cultures and lack of need for routine subculture of 5- to 7-day negative cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30, 2743-2745 
  7. Rohner, P., B. Pepey, and R. Auckenthaler. 1995. Comparison of BacT/Alert with Signal blood culture system. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33, 313-317 
  8. Fontanals, D., I. Sanfeliu, I. Pons, D. Mariscal, and M. Torra. 1998. Evaluation of the BacT/Alert and VITAL blood culture systems for the diagnosis of bacteremia. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 4, 88-93 
  9. Qian, Q., Y.W. Tang, C.P. Kolbert, C.A. Torgerson, J.G. Hughes, E.A. Vetter, W.S. Harmsen, S.O. Montgomery, F.R. Cockerill, 3rd. and D.H. Persing. 2001. Direct identification of bacteria from positive blood cultures by amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene: evaluation of BACTEC 9240 instrument true-positive and false-positive results. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39, 3578-3582 
  10. Schwabe, L.D., R.B. Jr. Thomson, K.K. Flint, and F.P. Koontz. 1995. Evaluation of BACTEC 9240 blood culture system by using high-volume aerobic resin media. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33, 2451-2453 
  11. Gimenez, M., C. Prat, X. Valles, L. Matas, J. Arnal, and V. Ausina. 2002. Evaluation of the VITAL (bioMérieux) automated blood culture system using blind subculture. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 8, 222-228 
  12. Alfa, M., S. Sanche, S. Roman, Y. Fiola, P. Lenton, and G. Harding. 1995. Continuous quality improvement for introduction of automated blood culture instrument. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33, 1185-1191 
  13. Mirrett, S., L.B. Reller, C.A. Petti, C.W. Woods, B. Vazirani, R. Sivadas, and M.P. Weinstein. 2003. Controlled clinical comparison of BacT/Alert standard aerobic medium with BACTEC standard aerobic medium for culturing blood. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41, 2391-2394 
  14. Nicholls, T.M., A.S. Morgan, and A.J. Morris. 2000. Nosocomial blood stream infection in Auckland Healtcare hospitals. N. Z. Med. J. 113, 96-98 
  15. Daxboeck, F., H.J. Dornbusch, R. Krause, O. Assadian, and C. Wenisch. 2004. Verification of false-positive blood culture results generated by the BACTEC 9000 series by eubacterial 16S rDNA and panfungal 18S rDNA directed polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 48, 1-3 
  16. Wellinghausen, N., B. Wirths, A.R. Franz, L. Karolyi, R. Marre, and U. Reischl. 2004. Algorithm for the identification of bacterial pathogens in positive blood cultures by real-time Light- Cycler polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with sequencespecific probes. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 48, 229-241 

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (1)

  1. Sung, Hye-Ran ; Kim, Il-Hoi ; Kim, Jee-Youn ; Lee, Chong-Kil ; Chung, Yeon-Bok ; Han, Sang-Bae ; Song, Suk-Gil 2008. "Detection of Microbial Growth in an Automated Culture System" Korean journal of microbiology = 미생물학회지, 44(2): 130~134 


원문 PDF 다운로드

  • ScienceON :

원문 URL 링크

원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. (원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기)

상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일