• 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Poultry Enteric Fermentation


Emissions of nitrous oxide (N$_2$O) and methane (CH$_4$) from poultry enteric fermentation were investigated using a respiration chamber. Birds were placed in a respiration chamber for certain intervals during their growing period or for the whole life cycle. The accumulated gas inside the chamber was sampled and analyzed for N$_2$O and CH$_4$ production. A curve for gas production during a life cycle was fitted. The calculated area under the curve estimated the emission factor of poultry enteric fermentation on a life cycle basis (mg bird$^{-1}$ life cycle$^{-1}$). This method can be used to estimate CH$_4$ or N$_2$O emissions from different types of avian species taking into account factors such as diet, season or thermal effects. The CH$_4$/N$_2$O emission factors estimated for commercial broiler chickens, Taiwan country chickens and White Roman Geese were 15.87/0.03, 84.8/16.4 and 1,500/49 (mg bird$^{-1}$ life cycle$^{-1}$), respectively, while the calculated CH$_4$/N$_2$O emission from enteric fermentations were 3.03/0.006, 14.73/2.84 and 9.5/0.31 (Mg year$^{-1}$), respectively in Taiwan in the year of 2000. The described method is applicable to most poultry species and the reported emission factors were applicable to meat type poultry only.

저자의 다른 논문

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Annison, E. F., K. J. Kill and R. Kenworthy. 1968. Volatile fatty acids in the digestive tract of the fowl. Br. J. Nutr. 22:207-216. 
  2. Chen, Y. H., S. Y. Wang and H. K. Hsu. 2003. Effects of caecetomy on body weight, intestinal characteristics and enteric gas production in goslings. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16:1030-1034. 
  3. Gibbs, M. J. and D. E. Johnson. 1993. Livestock emissions. In: international methane emissions, US Environmental Protection Agency, Climate Change Division, Washington, DC, USA. 
  4. Grabarse, W., F. Mahlert, E. Duin, M. Goubeaud, S. Shima, R. Thauer, V. Lamzin and U. Ermler. 2001. On the mechanism of biological methane formation: structural evidence for conformational changes in methyl-coenzyme M reductase upon substrate binding. J. Mol. Biol. 309:315-330. 
  5. EPA. 2002. UNFCC National Communication of the Republic of China (Taiwan). Environmental Protect Administration, ROC (Taiwan). 
  6. Houghton, J. T., Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Marshall and C. A. Johnson. 2001. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 
  7. Hsu, A. L. 1998. The nutritional requirement of Taiwan country chicken. Feed and Nutrition Magazine. 98(1):13-21. 
  8. Wang, S.-Y., W. C. Ma and D. J. Huang. 2002. Estimation of greenhouse gas emission from enteric fermentation of laying hens in Taiwan. J. Chin. Soc. Anim. Sci. 31:221-230. 
  9. Farrell, D. J. 1972. An indirect closed circuit respiration chamber suitable for fowl. Poult. Sci. 51:683-688. 
  10. Sukahara, T. and K. Ushida. 2000. Effects of animal or plant protein diets on cecal fermentation in guinea pigs (Cavia porclellus), rats (Rattus norvegicus) and chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A127:139-146. 
  11. Houghton, J. 1999. Global Warming. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 
  12. Sommer, S. G. and P. Dahl. 1999. Nutrient and carbon balance during the composting of deep litter. J. Agr. Eng. Res. 74:145-153. 
  13. Stevens, C. E. and I. D. Hume. 1995. Comparative physiology of the Vertebrate Digestive System. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 
  14. Robinson, J. A., W. J. Smolenski, M. L. Ogilvie and J. P. Peters. 1989. In vitro total gas, CH4, H2, volatile fatty acid and lactate kinetics studies on luminal contents from the small intestine, cecum and colon of the pig. Appl. Envir. Microbiol. 55:2460-2467. 
  15. Chen, Y. H., H. K. Hsu and J. C. Hsu. 2002. Studies on the fine structure of caeca in domestic geese. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15:1018-1021. 
  16. Mattocks, J. G. 1971. Goose feeding and cellulose digestion. Wildfowl 22:107-113. 
  17. Yan, T., R. E. Agnew, F. J. Gorden and M. G. Porter. 2000. Prediction of methane energy output in dairy and beef cattle offered grass silage-based diets. Livest. Prod. Sci. 64:253-263. 
  18. Hironaka, R., G. W. Mathison, B. K. Kerrigan and I. Vlach. 1996. The effect of pelleting of alfalfa hay on methane production and digestibility by steers. Sci. Total Envir. 180:221-227. 
  19. COA. 2001. Agricultural Statistics Yearbook 2000. Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan. Taiwan. 
  20. Gasaway W. C. 1976. Seasonal variation in diet, volatile fatty acids production and size of the cecum of rock ptarmigan. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 53A:109-114. 
  21. IPCC. 1996. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventory. Reference Manual.Vol. 3. Bracknell, UK. 
  22. Le Mer, J. and P. Roger. 2001. Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: A review. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 37:25-50. 
  23. McBee, R. H. 1969. Cecal fermentation in the willow ptarmigan. Conder 71:54-58. 
  24. Crutzen, P. J., I. Aselman and I. Seiler. 1986. Methane production by domestic animals, wild ruminants, other herbivorous fauna, and human. Tellus, 38B:271-284. 

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (1)

  1. 2009. "" Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 22(7): 1043~1047 


원문 PDF 다운로드

  • ScienceON :
  • KCI :

원문 URL 링크

원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. (원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기)

상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일