• 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보


Feeding values of soybean hulls (SH) were compared to those of wheat bran (WB) for swine diets by chemical compositions, a digestion trial, a preference test by self-selection, and two feeding trials. The SH and the WB appeared to have, on airdry basis, 11.1 vs. 15.4% CP, 32.5 vs. 8.7% crude fiber (CF), 36.8 vs. 10.7% ADF, 0.6 vs. 0.1% Ca, and 492 vs. 92 ppm Fe, respectively. Lysine and total sulfur-containing amino acids in the SH were 0.66 vs. 0.37%, respectively. Apparent digestibility values of the SH were 71% for dry matter, 50% for CP, and 74% for CF. Apparent digestible energy and MEn values of the SH were 2,420 and 2,370 kcal kg$^-1$, respectively, which were comparable to those of the WB, 2,420 and 2,275 kcal kg$^-1$ (NRC, 1998), respectively. The first feeding trial was conducted with 72 crossbred growing pigs with an average weight of 29.6 kg. The pigs when fed the diets containing 0, 6 and 10% SH by replacing the WB on a weight basis for 42 days did not show significant differences in body weight gain and feed/gain ratio among the treatments. The same trends were observed in the second trial with 60 crossbred finishing pigs with an average weight of 64.5 kg when fed the diets containing 12% SH or WB for 41 days. Back-fat thickness and adjusted loin eye muscle area of the finisher pigs were also not significantly different between the two groups. When allowed to self-select from two different feed troughs containing 10% SH or WB for two weeks, two groups of 80 pigs with 10 pigs per pen consumed the two diets exactly in equal proportion. In conclusion, the soybean hulls can be included up to 10 and 12% for growing or finishing pig diets, respectively, replacing the wheat bran on a weight basis without any adverse effects on palatability of diets and animal performances.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Chabeauti, E., J. Noblet and B. Carre. 1991. Digestion of plant cell walls from four different sources in growing pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 32:207-213. 
  2. Drewry, K. J. 1977. Indiana on-farm boar testing program and rules. Purdue University, AS-380. 
  3. Huh, M. S., M. H. Shin, Y. B. Lee and H. S. Sohn. 1999. Effects of soybean hull iron on growth, iron bioavailability, and behavioral function in anemic rats induced by iron deficiency during gestation or lactation. Nutr. Res. 19:1749-1761. 
  4. Kornegay, E. T., H. R. Thomas, S. R. Arthur, C. L. Gaines, K. L. Bryant and J. M. Knoght. 1981a. Pigs per cage, flooring materials and use of soybean hulls in starter diets for pigs housed in triple deck nurseries. J. Anim. Sci. 51:285-293. 
  5. Mitaru, B. N., R. Blair, R. D. Reichert and W. E. Roe. 1984. Dark and yellow rapeseed hulls, soybean hulls and a purified fiber source: Their effects on dry matter, energy, protein and amino acid digestibilities in cannulated pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 59:1510-1518. 
  6. Leeson, S. and J. D. Summer. 2001. Scott’s Nutrition of the Chicken. 4th ed. University Books, Guelph. 
  7. Kornegay, E. T. 1978. Soybean hulls for growing, finishing swine. Feedstuffs. May 1, pp. 24-26. 
  8. Scott, M. L., M. C. Nesheim and R. J. Young. 1982. Nutrition of the Chicken. 3rd ed. M.L. Scott and Associates, Ithaca, New York. 
  9. Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., New York. 
  10. Pond, W. G., D. C. Church and K. R. Pond. 1995. Basic Animal Nutrition and Feeding. 4th ed. Wiley, New York. 
  11. Bhar, R., N. N. Pathak and S. Paul. 2000. Performance of crossbred (Landrace${\times}$local India) finisher barrows fed maize or wheat bran based diets: Short note. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13:1429-1432. 
  12. National Research Council. 1998. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. 
  13. AOCS. 1976. Official and tentative methods of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. Urease activity. Official Method Ba 9-58. 
  14. Schneider, B. H. and W. P. Flatt. 1975. The evaluation of feeds through digestibility experiments. The University of Georgia Press, Athens. 
  15. Noblet, J. and G. Le Goff. 2001. Effect of dietary fiber on the energy value of feeds for pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 90:35-52. 
  16. SAS Institute Inc. 1989. SAS User’s Guide: Ver. 6. 4th ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. 
  17. Cole, J. T., G. C. Fahey Jr., N. R. Merchen, A. R. Patil, S. M. Murray, H. S. Hussein and J. L. Brent Jr. 1999. Soybean hulls as a dietary fiber source for dogs. J. Anim. Sci. 77:917-924. 
  18. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Virginia. 
  19. Shriver, J. A., S. D. Carter, A. L. Sutton, B. T. Richter, B. W. Senne and L. A. Pettery. 2003. Effects of adding fiber sources to reduced-crude protein, amino acid-supplemented diets on nitrogen excretion, growth performance, and carcass traits of finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 81:492-502. 
  20. Williams, C. H., D. J. David and O. Ilsmaa. 1962. The determination of chromic oxide in fecal samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. J. Agric. Sci. 59:381-385. 
  21. Kornegay, E. T. 1981b. Soybean hull digestibility by sows and feeding value for growing-finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 53:138-145. 
  22. Goering, H. E. and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. In Agr. Handbook. ARS, USDA, Beltsville. M D. 

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음


원문 PDF 다운로드

  • ScienceON :
  • KCI :

원문 URL 링크

원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. (원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기)

상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일