Abstract

In this paper, it is clearly shown that the two well-known necessary and sufficient conditions mp n as generic static output feedback pole-assignment and mp + d(m+p) n+d as generic minimum d-th order dynamic output feedback pole-assignment on complex field, unbelievably, do not match up each other in strictly proper linear systems. For the analysis, a diagram analysis is newly created (which is defined by the analysis of 'convoluted rectangular/dot diagrams' constructed via node-branch conversion of the signal flow graphs of output feedback gain loops). Under this diagram analysis, it is proved that the minimum d-th order dynamic output feedback compensator for pole-assignment in m-input, p-output, n-th order systems is quantitatively decomposed into static output feedback compensator and its associated d number of arbitrary 1st order dynamic elements in augmented (m+d)-input, (p+d)-output, (n+d)-th order systems. Total configuration of the mismatched data is presented in a Table.

주제어

#Decomposition of dynamic output feedback in augmented static output feedback systems   #generic pole-assignment   #Grassmann invariant of static output feedback linear systems  

참고문헌 (16)

1. X. Wang, 'Pole placement by static output feedback,' J. Math. Systems, Estimation, Control, vol. 2, pp. 205-218, 1992 
2. H. Kimura, 'Pole assignment by output feedback: A longstanding open problem,' in Conf. Decision Control, vol. 12, pp. 2101-2105, 1994 
3. J. Rosenthal and X. Wang, 'Output feedback pole placement with dynamic compensators,' IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, vol. 41, pp. 830- 843, 1996 
4. M. S. Ravi, J. Rosenthal and U. Helmke, 'Output feedback invariants,' SIAM J. Control and Optimization, vol. 40, pp. 743-755, 2002 
5. G. Gratzer, General Lattice Theory, Academic Press, Inc. (London) Ltd, 1978 
6. R. Hermann and C. F. Martin, 'Application of algebraic geometry to system theory. Part-I,' IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, vol. 22, pp. 19-25, 1977 
7. R. W. Brockett and C. I. Byrnes, 'Multivariable Nyquist criteria, root loci and pole placement: A geometric viewpoint,' IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, vol. 26, pp. 271-284, 1981 
8. A. G. J. McFarlane and N. Karcanias, 'Pole and zeros of linear multivariable systems: the algebraic, geometric and complex-variable theory,' Int. J. Control, vol. 24, pp. 33-74, 1976 
9. L. Carotenuto, G. Franze and P. Muraca, 'Some results on the genericity of the pole assignment problem,' System and Control Letters, vol. 42, pp. 291-298, 2001 
10. X. Wang, 'Grassmannian, central projection and output feedback pole-assignment of linear systems,' IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, vol. 41, pp. 786-794, 1996 
11. N. Karcanias and C. Giannakopoulos, 'Grassmann invariants, almost zeros and the determinantal zeros, pole assignment problems of linear multivariable systems,' Int. J. Control, vol. 40, pp. 673-698, 1984 
12. C. Giannakopoulos and N. Karcanias, 'Pole assignment of strictly and proper linear system by constant output feedback,' Int. J. Control, vol. 42, pp. 543-565, 1985 
13. B. Huber and J. Verschelde, 'Pieri homotopies for problems in enumerative geometry applied to pole placement in linear systems control,' SIAM J. Control and Optimization, vol. 38, pp. 1265-1287, 2000 
14. R. Fuhrmann and U. Helmke, 'Output feedback invariants and canonical forms for linear dynamic systems,' Linear Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing: Theory and Application, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland), pp. 279- 292, 1988 
15. Y. Yang and A. L. Tits, 'Generic pole assignment may produce very fragile designs,' Proc. of 37rd conf. on Decision and Control Tampa, FL, USA, pp. 1745-1746, 1998 
16. J. Rosenthal, 'On dynamic feedback compensation and compactification of systems,' SIAM J. Control Optim, vol. 32, pp. 279-296, 1994 

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음