$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
안녕하세요!
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

$Bio-pin^{(R)}$을 이용한 고정성 보철물의 탈락저항강도의 비교연구

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE RESISTANCE TO DISLODGEMENT OF FIXED PROSTHESES USING $BIO-PIN^{(R)}$

Abstract

Statement of problem. The current trend in prosthodontics is the adoption of a conservative approach to preparing dental prostheses by minimizing the amount of sound tooth structure removal during preparation. Purpose. The major disadvantage of the adhesion bridge is the inherently poor resistance to dislodgement that its use in areas subjected to high occlusal load is limited. The purpose of this study was to compare the dislodgement resistance of $Bio-pin^{(R)}$, conventional 3-unit and adhesion bridges. Material and methods. The experimental groups were classified as follows : Group I : 3-unit bridge cemented using $Super-Bond^{(R)}$ C&B Group II : Adhesion bridge cemented using $Super-Bond^{(R)}$ C&B Group III : $Bio-pin^{(R)}$ design adhesion bridge without incorporation of $Bio-pin^{(R)}$ (cemented using $Super-Bond^{(R)}$ C&B) Group IV-1 : $Bio-pin^{(R)}$ retained adhesion bridge incorporating a single $Bio-pin^{(R)}$ (cemented using $Super-Bond^{(R)}$ C&B) Group IV-2 : $Bio-pin^{(R)}$ retained adhesion bridge incorporating a single $Bio-pin^{(R)}$ (cemented using $Panavia^{(R)}$ F) Group V : $Bio-pin^{(R)}$ retained adhesion bridge incorporating two $Bio-pins^{(R)}$ (cemented using $Super-Bond^{(R)}$ C&B) Results. The results of this study were as follows : 1. Significant differences in dislodgement resistance of the restorations were found between Group I, Group II and Group III (p<0.05). No significant differences in dislodgement resistance of the restorations were observed between Group I Group IV-1 and Group V. However, there were significant differences in dislodgement resistance between Group II and the other groups (p<0.05). 2. No significant differences in dislodgement resistance of the restorations were observed between GroupIV-1 and GroupIV-2, both of which utilized a single $Bio-pin^{(R)}$. However, significant differences were observed when Group III was compared to either GroupIV-1 or Group V (p<0.05). 3. No significant differences in dislodgement resistance relative to the type of dental cements used were found. Conclusion. From the above results, it is concluded that the dislodgement resistance of $Bio-pin^{(R)}$ bridge restorations utilizing a single $Bio-pin^{(R)}$ is similar to that of a conventional 3-unit bridge. The results also suggest that $Bio-pin^{(R)}$ bridge restorations using a single $Bio-pin^{(R)}$ are a viable alternative to the conventional 3-unit bridge when minimal removal of sound tooth structure and fulfillment of both function and esthetic aspects are considered.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surface. J Dent Res 1955;34(6):849-53 
  2. Buonocore MG, Matsui A, Gwinnett AJ. Penetration of resin dental materials into enamel surfaces with reference to bonding. Archs Oral Biol 1968;13(1):61-70 
  3. Gwinnett AJ, Matsui A. A study of enamel adhesives. The physical relationship between enamel and adhesive. Archs Oral Biol 1967;12(12):1615-20 
  4. Pahlavan A. Dennison JB, Charbeneau GT. Penetration of restoration of restorative resins into acid-etched human enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 1976;93(6):1170-6 
  5. Prevost AP, Fuller JL, Peterson LC. Composite and intermediate resin tag formation in acid-etched enamel: A scanning electron microscopy evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52(2):204-7 
  6. Livaditis GJ, Thompson VP. Etched castings : an improved retentive mechanism for resin bonded retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47(1):52-8 
  7. Thompson VP, Castillo ED, Livaditis GJ. Resin-bonded retainers. Part I : Resin bond to electrolytically etched nonprecious alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50(6):771-9 
  8. Rochette AL. Attachment of a splint to enamel of lower anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1973;:30(4):418-23 
  9. Veen JH. Bronsdijk AE, Slagter AP, Poel ACM, Arends J. Tensile bond strength of Comspan resin to six differently treated metal surface. Dent Master 1988;4(5):272-7 
  10. Re GJ, Kaiser DA, Malone WFP, Garcia-Godoy F. Shear bond strengths and scanning electron microscope evaluation of three different retentive methods for resinbonded retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59(5):568-73 
  11. Tanaka T, Fujiyama E, Shimizu H, Takaki A, Atsuta M. Surface treatment of nonprecious alloys for adhesion-fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55(4):456-62 
  12. Verzijden CWGJM, Feilzer AJ, Creugers NHJ, Davidson CL. The influence of polymerization shrinkage of resin cements on bonding to metal. J Dent Res 1992;71(2):410-3 
  13. Shin HS,. Lee KW, Lee HY. An experimental study on bond strength of silicoated resin bonded restoration. The Journal of Korea Academy of Prosthodontics 1989;27:101-22 
  14. Choi NJ, Yang MS. The effects of metal surface treatment on bond strength between resin and metal interface of resin veneered crown, The Journal of Korea Academy of Prosthodontics 1994;32:471-83 
  15. Hansson O. Strength ofbond with Comspan Opaque to three silicoated alloys and titamium. Scand J Dent Res 1990;98(3):248-56 
  16. Hansson O. Moberg L-E. Evaluation of three silicoating methods for resin-bonded prostheses. Scand J Dent Res 1993;101(4):243-51 
  17. Naegeli DG, Duke ES. Schwartz R, Norling BK. Adhesive bonding of composites to a casting alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60(3):279-83 
  18. O' Keefe KL, Powers JM, McGuckin RS, Pierpont HP. In vitro bond strength of silica-coated metal posts in roots of teeth. Int J prosthodont 1992;5(4):373-6 
  19. Twesme DA, Lacefield WR, O' Neal SJ. Effects of thermocycling. silicoating and etching on composite bonding to Cu, Au and Ni base alloys. J Dent Res 1987;66:206 
  20. Lee KW. An experimental study on the bond strength of etched cast restoration using different metal surface treatment. The Journal of Korea Academy of Prosthodontics 1991;29:13 
  21. Tanaka T, Atsuta M, Nakabayashi N. Surface treatment of gold alloys for adhesion. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60(3):271-9 
  22. Lorey RE, Embrell KA, Myers GE. Retentive factors in pin-retained castings. J Prosthet Dent 1967;17(3):271-5 
  23. Yamashita A, Yamami T. Procedures for applying adhesive resin (MMA-TBB) to crown and bridge restorations. Part 1 : The influence of dental nonprecious alloy and the treatment of inner surface of metal to adhesion. J Jpn Pros Soc 1982;29:584 
  24. Gates WD, Diaz-Arnold AM, Aquilino SA. Ryther JS. Comparison of the adhesive strength of a BIS-GMA cement to tinplated and non-tin-plated alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69(1):12-31 
  25. Taleghani M, Leinfelder KF. Taleghani AM. An alternative to cast etched retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58(4):424-8 
  26. Sung MG, Kim KN, Chang IT. A stdy on the bond strength of 4-META acrylic resin denture base to cobalt-chromium alloys, The Journal of Korea Academy of Prosthodontics 1990;28:29-52 
  27. Lim JH, Cho IH, Lee JH. A comparative study of tensile bond strengths according to different designs. adhesives and treating methods of metal surface for adhesive cast restorations. The Journal of Korea Academy of Stomatognathic function and occlusion 1989;5:71 
  28. Jung KT, Yang JH, Lee SH, Jung HY. An experiment study on the bond strength of adhesive resins to successively recast alloys for resin-bonded restorations. The Journal of Korea Academy of Prosthodontics 1990;28:53-76 
  29. Wiltshire WA. Resin bonded fixed partial dentures utilizing additional pin retention. Quintessence Int 1986;17(6):343-7 
  30. Arcoria CJ, Dewald JP, Vitasek BA, Wagner MJ. Effect of undercut placement on crown retention after thermocycling. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17(5):395-402 
  31. el-Mowafy O, Rubo MH. Retention of a posterior resin-bonded fixed partial denture with a modified design: an in vitro study. lnt J Prosthodont 2000;13(5):425-31 
  32. Seol YH, Jung CM, Jeon YC, A study of the adhesive bond strength of composite resin to Au-Ag-Cu-Pd alloy, The Journal of Korea Academy of Prosthodontics 1994;32:378-95 
  33. Kang GG, Chung KH, Choi JH, Ahn SG. Song KY, Park CW. The effect of thermocycling on bond strength between metal and resin cement, The Journal of Korea Academy of Prosthodontics 1996;34:233-45 
  34. Wendt SL, McInnes PA, Dickinson GL. The effect of thermocycling in microleakage analysis. Dent Mater 1992;8(3):181-4 
  35. Ishijima T, AA Caputo, R Mito. Adhesion of resin to casting alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67(4):445-9 

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (2)

  1. Choi, Jong-In ; Kim, Yu-Lee ; Shin, Chang-Yong ; Dong, Jin-Keun 2010. "Fracture Resistance of Low Invasive Fixed Partial Dentures" 구강회복응용과학지 = Journal of dental rehabilitation and applied science, 26(3): 241~251 
  2. Doh, Re-Mee ; Lee, Keun-Woo 2011. "Modified resin-bonded fixed partial dentures utilizing tooth undercuts: a clinical case study" 대한치과보철학회지 = The journal of Korean academy of prosthodontics, 49(2): 106~113 

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • ScienceON :
  • KCI :

원문 URL 링크

원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. (원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기)

상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일