초록

본 연구의 목적은 학생들이 사용한 세 가지 Ni-Ti파일의 성형효율을 비교하고, 각 파일의 사용 경험 유무에 따른 차이를 비교하여 치과대학생을 위한 교육에 적합한 종류를 선택하는데 도움을 얻고자하는 것이다. Ni-Ti파일 사용 경험이 없는 학생 50명과 Ni-Ti파일을 사용한 근관치료 경력이 2년 이상인 경험자 10명이 세 종류의 Ni-Ti file - $ProFile^{(R)}\;(PF),\;HeroShaper^{(R)}\;(HS),\;K3^{TM}\;(K3)$ -을 사용하여 180개의 근관 모형을 성형하였다. 근관성형 시간 및 기구 변형, 근관 이형성을 조사하고 성형 전후 상을 중첩하여 근관 삭제폭, 근관변위량과 중심변위율을 1, 3. 5 mm에서 분석하였다. 1. 근관 성형시간은 HS군이 가장 빨랐으며, 총 삭제 량은 모든 지점에서 K3군이 다른 군보다 컸다 (P<0.05) . 2. 세 군 모두 1, 3 mm에서 외측 변이를 보였고, 1 mm지점에서 PF군이 가장 안정적이었다 (P<0.05). 3. 중심변위율은 1, 3 mm에서 HS, PF군이 K3군보다 작았다. 5 mm지점에서는 PF군이 가장 작았고, PF군 3 mm에서 학생은 경험자보다 유의하게 작았다 (P<0.05).

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the shaping ability of three Ni-Ti file systems used by dental students or the experts and consequently to aid in choosing a proper systems for educational courses of dental students and beginners. Fifty students and ten dentists who have clinical experience over two years prepared 180 simulated root canals in resin blocks with three Ni-Ti systems; $ProFile^{(R)}\;(PF),\;HeroShaper^{(R)}\;(HS),\;K3^{TM}\;(K3)$. After preparation, the Ni-Ti files were evaluated for distortion and canal preparation time was recorded. The images of pre- and post-instrumented canals were scanned and superimposed. Amounts of increased canal widths, deviation, and centering ratio were calculated at apical 1, 3 and 5 mm levels and statistical analysis was performed The results were as follows : 1. HS showed the shortest preparation time and instrumented canal width in K3 was significantly larger than other groups (P<0.05). 2. At 1 and 3mm levels, all groups had outward deviation. In student group, at the 1mm level, PF had the least deviation (P<0.05). 3. In the centering ratio, the PF had the best centering ability compared to the others at 5mm level. At 1 and 3mm levels, HS and PF had better abilities than K3. Student group had better ratio than the expert at 3mm level with PF (P<0.05). Based on the results, it is surmised that the $ProFile^{(R)}$ is the safest and most ideal instrument for students and beginners.

주제어

#치과대학생   #성형능력  

저자의 다른 논문

참고문헌 (32)

1. Baumann MA, Roth A. Effect of experience on quality of canal preparation with rotary nickel-titanium files. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 88(6):714-718, 1999 
2. Clauder T, Baumann MA. ProTaper NT system. Dent Clin North Am 48(1):87-111, 2004 
3. Qualtrough AJ, Whitworth JM, Dummer PM. Preclinical endodontology: an international comparison. Int Endod J 32(5):406-414, 1999 
4. Sonntag D, Guntermann A, Kim S.K., Stachniss V. Root canal shaping with manual stainless steel files and rotary Ni-Ti files performed by students. Int Endod J 36(4):246-255, 2003 
5. Sonntag D, Delschen S, Stachniww V. Root-canal shaping with manual and rotary Ni-Ti files performed by students. Int Endod J 36(11):715-723, 2003 
6. Hanni S, Schonenberger K, Peters OA, Barbakow F. Teaching an engine-driven preparation technique to undergraduates: initial observations. Int. Endod J 36(7):476-482, 2003 
7. Szep S, Gerhardt T, Leitzbach C, Luder W, Heidemann D. Preparation of severely curved simulated root canals using engine-driven rotary and conventional hand instruments. Clin Oral Investig 5(1):17-25, 2001 
8. Yared GM, Dagher FE, Machtou P, Kulkarni GK. Influence of rotational speed, torque and operator proficiency on failure of Greater Taper files. Int Endod J 35(1):7-12, 2002 
9. Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Beullens M, Wevers M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P. Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 36(4):288-295, 2003 
10. Calhoun G, Montgomery S. The effects of four instrumentation techniques on root canal shape. J Endod 14(6):273-277, 1988 
11. Parashos P, Messer HH. Questionnaire survey on the use of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments by Australian dentists. Int Endod J 37(4):249-259, 2004 
12. Yared G, Bou Dagher F, Kulkarni K. Influence of torque control motors and the operator's proficiency on ProTaper failures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radio Endod 96(2):229-233, 2003 
13. Song YL, Bian Z, Fan B, Fan MW, Gutmann JL, Peng B. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques. Int Endod J 37:265-271, 2004 
14. Yared GM, Bou dagher FE, Machtou P. Cyclic fatigue of ProFile rotary instruments after clinical use. Int Endod J 33:204-207, 2000 
15. Garip Y, Gunday M. The use of computed tomography when comparing nickel-titanium and stainless steel files during preparation of simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 34(6):452-457, 2001 
16. Hata G, Uemura M, Kato AS, Imura N, Novo NF, Toda T. A comparison of shaping ability using ProFile, GT file, and Flex-R endodontic instruments in simulated canals. J Endod 28(4):316-321, 2002 
17. Ankrum MT, Hartwell GR, Truitt JE. K3 Endo, ProTaper, and ProFile systems: breakage and distortion in severely curved roots of molars. J Endod 30(4):234-237, 2004 
18. Kosa DA, Marshall G, Baumgartner JC. An analysis of canal centering using mechanical instrumentation techniques. J Endod 25(6):441-445, 1999 
19. Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Gaviglio I, Ibba A. Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile. J Endod 29(1):15-19, 2003 
20. Schafer E, Schulz-Bongert U, Tulus G. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study. J Endod 30(6):432-435, 2004 
21. 고현정, 백승호, 수종의 Engine driven NiTi file과 stainless steel K-file을 이요한 근관형성 후 근관의 조직형태학적 변화에 관한 연구. 대한치과보존학회지 27:6:612-618, 2002 
22. Park SH, Cho KM, Kim JW. The Efficiency of the Ni-Ti Rotary files in Curved Simulated Canals Shaped by Novice Operators. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 28(2):146-155, 2003  원문보기 상세보기
23. Yun HH, Kim SK. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel- titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95(2):228-233, 2003 
24. Kim HC, Park JK, Hur B. Relative efficacy of three Ni-Ti file systems used by undergraduates. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 30(1):38-48, 2005 
25. Schafer E. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92(2):215-220, 2001 
26. Schafer E, Vlassis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 37(4):229-238, 2004 
27. Qualtrough AJ, Dummer PM. Undergraduate endodontic teaching in the United Kingdom: an update. Int Endod J 30(4):234-239, 1997 
28. Yared GM, Kulkarni GK. Failure of ProFile Ni-Ti instruments used by an inexperienced operator under access limitations. Int Endod J 35:536-541, 2002 
29. Dobo-Nagy C, Serban T, Szabo J, Nagy G, Madlena M. A comparison of the shaping characteristics of two nickel-titanium endodontic hand instruments. Int Endod J 35:283-288, 2002 
30. 박완기, 이희주, 허복. 다양한 엔진 구동형 파일의 근관 성형 능력 비교. 대한치과보존학회지 29:1:44-50, 2004 
31. Ove A. Peters. PD Dr med dent, MS FICD. Current Challenges and Concepts in the Preparation of Root Canal Systems : A Review. J Endod 30(8):559-567, 2004 
32. Gambarini. G. Cyclic fatigue of ProFile rotary instruments after prolonged clinical use. Int Endod J 34:386-389, 2001 

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (1)

1. Kim, Bo-Hye ; Choi, Kyoung-Kyu ; Park, Sang-Hyuk ; Choi, Gi-Woon 2010. "A COMPARISON OF THE SHAPING ABILITY OF FOUR ROTARY NICKEL-TITANIUM FILES IN SIMULATED ROOT CANALS" 大韓齒科保存學會誌 = Journal of Korean Academy of Operative Dentistry, 35(2): 88~95  원문보기 상세보기