$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
안녕하세요!
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis(CASA)를 이용한 제주마 정액의 운동성 평가

Assessment of Jeju Horse Semen using Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis (CASA)

초록

본 연구는 제주도 축산진흥원과 농촌진흥청 난지농업연구소에서 사육되고 있는 제주마 5두를 사용하여 인공질을 이용, 정액을 채취하여 정액의 일반성상 및 CASA를 이용하여 정자의 운동성과 생사 염색으로 기형률을 조사하였다. 제주마 정액의 일반 특성으로 총 정액량은 평균 42.5ml이었으며 평균 pH는 7.3, 평균 정자농도는 평균 $198.5X10^6/m1$ 이었다. 정자의 운동성은 $64.3{\pm}23.2%$이며, motility parameters 별로 VAP $70.4{\pm}28.7{\mu}m/s,\;VSL\;69.6{\pm}28.9{\mu}m/s,\;VCL\;94.1{\pm}30.0{\mu}m/s,\;ALH\;2.3{\pm}0.7{\mu}m/s,\;BCF\;7.6{\pm}1.1Hz,\;STR\;99.1{\pm}1.2%,\;LIN\;77.1{\pm}12.7%$로 나타났다. 정자 부위별 기형률은 두부가 평균 4 %, 경부가 평균 20 %, 미부가 평균 4 %로 나타났다. 이 연구를 통해 천연기념물로 지정되어 있는 제주마의 유전자원 보존과 증식을 위한 인공수정기술의 실용화를 위한 기초 자료를 제공하고자 한다.

Abstract

The objective of the study was to assess the general characteristics and motility characteristics with Computer Assisted Sperm Analyzer (CASA) system in Jeju horse semen. Semen was collected from 5 fertile Jeju horse by use of a Missouri type artificial vagina. Semen volume and pH were recorded, and sperm concentration was determined with a hematocytometer and motional characteristics of sperm were analysed by CASA. The viability and morphological abnormalities were assessed by a vital staining. The average volume of ejaculates was 42.5 ml and the average of sperm concentration was $198.5x10^6/m1$. The motional characteristics in Jeju horse semen was showed $70.4{\pm}28.7{\mu}m/s\;for\;VAP,\;69.6{\pm}28.9{\mu}m/s\;for\;VSL,\;94.1{\pm}30.0{\mu}m/s\;fo\;VCL,\;2.3{\pm}0.7{\mu}m/s\;for\;ALH,\;7.6{\pm}1.1Hz\;for\;BCF,\;99.1{\pm}1.2%\;for\;STR,\;and\;77.1{\pm}12.7%\;for\;LIN$. The percentage of sperm with abnormal head, midpiece and tail was 4.2%, 20.6%, 4.6% respectively.

저자의 다른 논문

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Agarwal A, Sharma RK and Nelson DR. 2003. New semen quality scores developed by principal component analysis of semen characteristics. J. Androl., 24:343-352 
  2. Armann RP. 1989. Can the fertility potential of a seminal sample be predicted accurately? J. Androl., 10:89-98 
  3. Coetzee K, Kruger TF and Lombard CJ. 1999. Repeatability and variance analysis on multiple computer-assisted (IVOS) sperm morphology readings. Andrologia, 31: 163-168 
  4. Davis RO and Siemers RJ. 1995. Derivation and reliability of kinematic measures of sperm motion. Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 7:857-869 
  5. Fernandes PA, McCoshen JA, Cheang M, Kredentser JV and Wodzicki AM. 1990. Quantitative analysis of the effect of freezing on donor sperm motion kinetics. Fertil. Steril., 54:322-327 
  6. Holt W, Watson P, Curry M and Holt C. 1994. Reproducibility of computer-aided semen analysis: comparison of five different systems used in a practical workshop. Fertil. Steril., 62:1277-1282 
  7. Johnson JE, Boone WR and Blackhurst DW. 1996. Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part II. Determination of the working range of a computer-automated semen analyzer. Fertil. Steril., 65:156-159 
  8. Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, Swanson RJ, Matta JF and Oehninger S. 1988. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril., 49: 112-117 
  9. Pusch HH, Leitinger S, Winter R and Urdl W. 1986. Evaluation of sperm motility by laser-Doppler-spectroscopy in an in-vitro fertilization programme. Hum. Reprod., 1:233-235 
  10. Bielanski W, Dudek E, Bittmar A and Kosiniak K. 1982. Some characteristis of common abnormal forms of spermatozoa in highly fertile stallions. J. Reprod. Fert. Suppl., 32:21-26 
  11. Auger J, Leonce S, Jouannet P and Ronot X. 1993. Flow cytometric sorting of living, highly motile human spermatozoa based on evaluation of their mitochondrial activity. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 41:1247-1251 
  12. Dunphy BC, Kay R, Barratt CL and Cooke ID. 1989. Quality control during the conventional analysis of semen, an essential exercise. J. Androl., 10:378-385 
  13. 박남건, 오운용, 이성수, 오창언, 강수원, 고서봉, 강민수, 김희석. 1995. 제주재래마 정액의 동결 보존에 관한 연구. 농업논문집, 37:459-463 
  14. Davis RO, Drobnis EZ and Overstreet JW. 1995. Application of multivariate cluster, discriminate function, and stepwise regression analyses to variable selection and predictive modeling of sperm cryosurvival. Fertil. Steril., 63:1051-1057 
  15. McDonnell SM and Hize AL. 2005. Aversive conditioning of periodic spontaneous erection adversely affects sexual behavior and semen in stallions. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 89:77-92 
  16. Magistrini M, Chanteloube P and Palmer E. 1987. Influence of season and frequency of ejaculation on production of stallion semen for freezing. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl., 35:127-133 
  17. Purvis K, Tollefsrud A and Rui H. 1989. Correlates of human sperm motility assessed by laser Doppler spectroscopy. Int. J. Androl., 12:10-16 
  18. Imade GE, Towobola OA, Sagay AS and Otubu JA. 1993. Discrepancies in sperm count using improved Neubauer, Makler, and Horwells counting chambers. Arch. Androl., 31:17-22 
  19. Lackey BR, Boone WR, Gray SL and Henricks DM. 1998. Computer-assisted sperm motion analysis of bovine sperm treated with insulin-like growth factor I and II: implications as motility regulators and chemokinetic factors. Arch. Androl., 41:115-125 
  20. Dowsett KF and Pattie WA. 1982. Characteristics and fertility of stallion semen. J. Reprod. Fert. Suppl., 44:77-86 
  21. Farrell PB, Foote RH, McArdle MM, Trouern-Trend VL and Tardif AL. 1996. Media and dilution procedures tested to minimize handling effects on human, rabbit, and bull sperm for computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA). J. Androl., 17:293-300 
  22. Marshburn PB, McIntire D, Carr BR and Byrd W. 1992. Spermatozoal characteristics from fresh and frozen donor semen and their correlation with fertility outcome after intrauterine insemination. Fertil. Steril., 58: 179-188 
  23. Hirano Y, Shibahara H, Obara H; Suzuki T, Takamizawa S, Yamaguchi C, Tsunoda H and Sato I. 2001. Relationships between sperm motility characteristics assessed by the computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) and fertilization rates in vitro. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet., 18:213-218 
  24. Armant DR and Ellis MA. 1995. Improved accuracy of sperm motility assessment using a modified Micro-Cell sperm counting chamber. Fertil. Steril., 63:1128-1130 
  25. Budworth PR, Amann RP and Chapman PL. 1988. Relationships between computerized measurements of motion of frozen-thawed bull spermatozoa and fertility. J. Androl., 9:41-54 
  26. Quintero-Moreno A, Miro J, Teresa Rigau A and Rodriguez-Gil JE. 2003. Identification of sperm subpopulations with specific motility characteristics in stallion ejaculates. Theriogenology, 59: 1973-1990 
  27. Chan SY, Wang C, Song BL, Lo T, Leung A, Tsoi WL and Leung J. 1989. Computer-assisted image analysis of sperm concentration in human semen before and after swim-up separation: Comparison with assessment by haemocytometer. Int. J. Androl., 12:339-345 
  28. Jequier AM and Ukombe EB. 1983. Errors inherent in the performance of a routine semen analysis. Br. J. Urol., 55:434-436 
  29. Vetter CM, Miller JE, Crawford LM, Armstrong MJ, Clair JH, Conner MW, Wise LD and Skopek TR. 1998. Comparison of motility and membrane integrity to assess rat sperm viability. Reprod. Toxicol., 12:105-114 
  30. 양보석, 강승률, 이성수, 조인철, 검영훈, 전창익, 정진관, 2001. 제주마 정액의 일반성상에 관한 연구. 한국수정란이식학회지, 16: 127-131 
  31. Jeulin C, Lewin LM, Chevrier C and Schoevaert Brossault TD. 1996. Changes in flagella movement of rat spermatozoa along the length of the epididymis : Manual and computer-aided image analysis. Cell. Motil. Cystoskeleton, 35:147-161 
  32. Squires EL, Pickett BW, Graham JK, Vanderwall DK, McCue PM and Bruemmer JE. 1999. Cooled and frozen stallion semen. Anim. Reprod. Biotech. Lab. Colorado State Univ. Bulletin No. 09 
  33. Donnelly ET, Lewis SE, McNally JA and Thompson W. 1998. In vitro fertilization and pregnancy rates: the influence of sperm motility and morphology on IVF outcome. Fertil. Steril., 70: 305-314 
  34. Iguer-Ouada M and Verstegen JP. 2001. Evaluation of the 'Hamilton Thorn computer-based automated system' for dog semen analysis. Theriogenology, 55:733-749 
  35. 오운용, 박남건, 김영훈, 이성수, 김희석, 김중계, 신원집. 1994. 제주재래마 정액의 일반성상에 관한 조사연구. 농업논문집, 36:552-557 
  36. Rashid MRZ, Fishel SB and Thornton S. 1998. The predictive value of the zona free hamster egg penetration test in relation to in vitro fertilization at various insemination concentrations. Hum. Reprod., 13:624-629 
  37. Thurston LM, Watson PF, Mileham AJ and Holt WV. 2001. Morphologically distinct sperm subpopulations defined by Fourier shape descriptors in fresh ejaculates correlate with variation in boar semen quality following cryopreservation. J. Androl., 22:382-394 

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (1)

  1. Kang, M.S. ; Park, J.B. ; Son, W.G. ; Ko, M.S. ; Son, W.J. ; Yoo, J.G. ; Yun, Y.M. ; Lee, J.M. ; Kang, T.Y. 2007. "Reproductive Performance in Relation to Vulvar Conformation in Cheju Mares" Journal of embryo transfer = 한국수정란이식학회지, 22(2): 97~100 

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • ScienceON :

원문 URL 링크

원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. (원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기)

상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일