• 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보


Purpose: Concept analysis is an essential part of theory development in nursing. Thus, many strategies or methods of concept analysis have been suggested in nursing literature. However, in Korea, only limited strategies were utilized, without much consideration on a wide range of strategies in choosing a method that coincides with the characteristics of each concept to analyze The purpose of this article was to propose various strategies for concept analysis. Method: A literature review method was used. Result: Ten methods of concept analysis were identified in the literature, and they were evaluated for advantages and limitations, In addition to the method by Walker and Avant and a hybrid model, more advanced strategies, such as triangulation method, critical analysis and the feminist approach were introduced and described in detail. The examples used in each concept analysis method were presented in table to provide the extent of utilization of each method. Conclusion: This article provides a wide range of strategies in identifying, clarifying, or elaborating a concept. It might help in choosing a method that best fits the concept to analyze, thus enhancing quality of concept analysis research.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Meleis, A. I. (1985). Theoretical nursing: Development and progress (2nd Ed.). California : J. B. Lippincott 
  2. Morse, J. M., Hupcey, J. E., & Lenz, E. R. (1997). Choosing a strategy for concept analysis in nursing research: Moving beyond Wilson. In Gift, A. G.(l997). Clarifying concepts in nursing research (pp. 73-96). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company 
  3. Rodgers, B. L. (1989). Concepts, analysis and the development of nursing knowledge: The evolutionary cycle. J Adv Nurs, 14, 330-335 
  4. Shih, F. J. (1998). Triangulation in nursing research: Issues of conceptual clarity and purpose. J Adv Nurs, 28(3), 631-641 
  5. Streubert, H. J., & Carpenter, D. R. (1999). Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative (2nd Ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott 
  6. Tripp-Reimer, T. (1984). Reconceptualizing the construct of health: Integrating emic and etic perspectives. Res Nurs Health, 7, 101-109 
  7. Warner, R. (1999). The emic and etics of quality of life assessment. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 34(3), 117-121 
  8. Chinn, P. L., & Kramer, M. K. (1995). Theory and nursing. A systematic approach(4th ed.). St. Louis: Mosby 
  9. Schwartz-Barcott, D., & Kim, H. S. (1986). Hybrid model for concept development. In P. L. Chinn (Ed.), Nursing research methodology: Issues and implementations. Rockville, MD: Aspen 
  10. Bash, A. (2004). Spirituality: the emperor's new clothes?. J Clin Nurs, 13, 11-16 
  11. Glass N., & Davis K. (2004). Reconceptualizing vulnerability; deconstruction and reconstruction as a postmodern feminist analytical research method. Advances in Nursing Science, 27(2), 82-92 
  12. Wuest, J. (1994). A feminist approach to concept analysis. West J Nurs Res, 16(5), 577-586 
  13. Lee, S. W., Kim, J. H., Lee, B. S., Lee, E. H., & Jung, M. S. (1997). Understanding of the nursing theory. Seoul: SooMoon Publishing 
  14. Ford-Gilboe, M., & Campbell, J. (1996). The mother-headed single-parent family: A feminist critique of the nursing literature. Nurs Outlook, 44, 173-83 
  15. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. New York: Cornell University Press 
  16. Morse, J. M. (2000) Exploring pragmatic utility: concept analysis by critically appraising the literature. In B. L. Rodgers & K. A. Knafl (2nd Ed), Concept development in nursing: Foundations, techniques, and applications (pp. 333-352). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co 
  17. Lefler, L. L. (2004). Perceived risk of heart attack: A function of gender? Nursing Forum, 39(2), 18-26 
  18. Foss, C., & Ellefsen, B. (2002). The value of combing qualitative and quantitative approaches in nursing research by means of method triangulation. J Adv Nur, 40(2), 242-248 
  19. Rodgers, B. L., & Knafl, K. A. (2000). Philosophical foundation of concept development. In B. L. Rodgers & K. A. Knafl (2nd Ed), Concept development in nursing: Foundations, techniques, and applications (pp. 7-37). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company 
  20. Cho, C. M., & Kim, B. H. (2000). Concept analysis about workers health, J Korean Acad Nurs, 30(2), 272-281 
  21. Fontana, J. S. (2004). A methodology for critical science in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 27(2), 93-101 
  22. Spiers, J. (2000). New perspectives on vulnerability using emic and etic approaches. J Adv Nurs, 31(3), 715-721 
  23. Morse, J. M., Mitcham, C., Hupcey, J. E., & Tason, M. C. (1996b). Criteria for concept evaluation. J Adv Nurs, 24, 385-390 
  24. Morse, J. M., Hupcey J. E, Mitcham, C., & Lenz, E. (1996). Concept analysis in nursing research: A critical appraisal. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice 10, 257-281 
  25. Walker, L. O., & Avant, K. C. (1995). Strateries for theory construction in nursing (3rd Ed.). Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange 
  26. Yi, M., & Yih, B. S. (2004). Feminism and qualitative nursing research. J Korean Acad Nurs, 34(3), 565-575 
  27. Leeming, D., & Boyle, M. (2004). Shame as a social phenomenon: A critical analysis of the concept of dispositional shame. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 77, 375-396 
  28. Murphy, N., & Canales, M. (2001). A critical analysis of compliance. Nursing Inquiry, 8(3), 173- 181 

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음


원문 PDF 다운로드

  • ScienceON :

원문 URL 링크

원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. (원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기)

상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일