The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of Cognitive Factors (CF) on the Creative Abilities (CAs) in design. We set up a model of Cognitive Design Process (CDP), which consists of four domains: Concepts, Experience, Five Senses (FS), and Thinking Modes (TM). Here, experien...
The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of Cognitive Factors (CF) on the Creative Abilities (CAs) in design. We set up a model of Cognitive Design Process (CDP), which consists of four domains: Concepts, Experience, Five Senses (FS), and Thinking Modes (TM). Here, experience is first perceived by the five senses, and then recognized by intelligence. We regard design as a transforming process from concept to experience. For this study, two major Sensory Modalities (Visual and Kinesthetic), four Thinking Modes (Brain Dominance Profile), and four Creative Abilities (Fluency, Flexibility, Originality, and Elaboration) were reviewed. We hypothesized that idea generation is influenced by different Sensory Modalities (Visual Sense vs. Kinesthetic Sense) and Thinking Modes, and that these have a close relationship with the attributes of CAs. Firstly, we have examined the cognitive thinking model in design. Then, we adapted the Test of Creative Abilities of Design Thinking (TCADT) for measuring CAs. We surveyed the CAs under CF in particular. Finally, we have investigated the influences of the different Sensory Modalities (Visual Sense vs. Kinesthetic Sense) on CAs. It was found that a close relationship between Brain Dominance and CAs, and Sensory Modalities (SM) have different influence on these creative abilities. As a result, a tool for the Test of CAs and a framework for creative idea generation with the effective CF will be presented. These provide the basis for a new approach to creative idea generation in Experience Design.
The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of Cognitive Factors (CF) on the Creative Abilities (CAs) in design. We set up a model of Cognitive Design Process (CDP), which consists of four domains: Concepts, Experience, Five Senses (FS), and Thinking Modes (TM). Here, experience is first perceived by the five senses, and then recognized by intelligence. We regard design as a transforming process from concept to experience. For this study, two major Sensory Modalities (Visual and Kinesthetic), four Thinking Modes (Brain Dominance Profile), and four Creative Abilities (Fluency, Flexibility, Originality, and Elaboration) were reviewed. We hypothesized that idea generation is influenced by different Sensory Modalities (Visual Sense vs. Kinesthetic Sense) and Thinking Modes, and that these have a close relationship with the attributes of CAs. Firstly, we have examined the cognitive thinking model in design. Then, we adapted the Test of Creative Abilities of Design Thinking (TCADT) for measuring CAs. We surveyed the CAs under CF in particular. Finally, we have investigated the influences of the different Sensory Modalities (Visual Sense vs. Kinesthetic Sense) on CAs. It was found that a close relationship between Brain Dominance and CAs, and Sensory Modalities (SM) have different influence on these creative abilities. As a result, a tool for the Test of CAs and a framework for creative idea generation with the effective CF will be presented. These provide the basis for a new approach to creative idea generation in Experience Design.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
문제 정의
a) All of the subjects were asked to fill a form, which consioled of titles and their sensation for tasks on idea generation. The focus of this experiment was to examine the relation between Sensory Modalities (SM) and Design Tasks (2-D/3-D).
The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of Cognitive Factors (CF) on the Creative Abilities (CAs) in design. In order to measure the CAs under different sensory systems, we adapted the Test of Creative Abilities of Design Thinking (TCADT).
1). This paper will examine the influences of Sensory Modalities (SM) on the Creative Abilities (CAs) in design, and the relationship between sensations of sketching task옹. These provide the basis for a new approach to a cognitive interaction in design.
가설 설정
Hypothesis 1: There are close relationships between the Representation Modes (RMs) in the tasks of the CAs. The CAs are measured by the TCADT (2-D and 3-D).
Hypothesis 2: Different Sensory Modalities (SMs) exist in 3-Dimensional Modeling. We reviewed that design is a typical cognitive approach with human SMs.
Hypothesis 3: There are significant relationships between preferred Representational Modes (RMs). From the above discussion, we refined that design is a cognitive interaction, which influences the preferred RM.
제안 방법
For the problem that is being considered, we want to bring about a desired solution that is something new and valuable.2 3 For that reason, design is a more open-ended problem solving activity that requires greater creativity, and the typical style of the designer's behavior underpins their creativity? During the design development, design concepts will be developed from sketches on paper into simple massing models. Yet, it is in the earliest stages of design when fundamental forms are being established, that the ability to think and see in three dimensions (3D) is most important.
The Procedures for scoring and rating under the criteria of the TCADTs were prepared for measuring the CAs. In order to measure the Influence of the Different Sensory Modalities (Visual vs. Kinesthetic Senses) on the CAs in Design, we set up two experimental situations: Visual Kinesthetic (Naked Eye: NE) and Kinesthetic (Eye Bandage: EB). (Fig.
The TCADT is a tool for measuring creative thinking for assessing four Mental Characteristics: fluency, flexibility, originality and elaboration. Then, we examined the relationships between CAs and Sensory Modalities (SMs).
This study does not offer a complete testing of two dimensions (2-D vs. 3-D), and these results are helpful to measure and evaluate the CAs in design. For future studies, we need to expand the subjects more generally, and find ways to reduce the errors of assessing the result of tests.
대상 데이터
72 subjects participated in the experiments. All subjects were undergraduate students of Industrial Design major, in 'A' university in Seoul.
72 subjects participated in the experiments. All subjects were undergraduate students of Industrial Design major, in 'A' university in Seoul. (Freshman: 38.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.