터널굴착이나 사면절취 등과 같은 굴착문제에 있어서 굴착방법을 결정하기 위해 대상암반에 대한 리핑 암이나 발파암의 구분이 우선되며, 다음에 발파에 의한 굴착방법이 선정되었을지라도 화약량 및 종류, 천공방법 등 발파설계를 위해서 추가적으로 발파암에 대한 세부적인 분류가 필요하다. 일반적으로 RMR 이나 Q 시스템과 같은 암반분류법이 많이 사용되고 있지만, 발파암에 대한 표준적인 암반분류법이 없으며, 국내에서도 발파암 분류에 대한 연구가 거의 전무한 상태로 발파암의 분류요소로 사용될 수 있는 요소를 구하기 위한 연구가 필요하다, 본 논문에서는 앞으로 국내에서 발파암 분류연구에 대한 방향제시를 위해서 발파와 암석의 역학적 특성, 지질구조와 불연속면의 특성과의 관계나 굴착과 관련된 암반분류에 대한 여러 논문사례를 통하여 발파암의 분류 요소와 분류방법 등을 분석한다.
터널굴착이나 사면절취 등과 같은 굴착문제에 있어서 굴착방법을 결정하기 위해 대상암반에 대한 리핑 암이나 발파암의 구분이 우선되며, 다음에 발파에 의한 굴착방법이 선정되었을지라도 화약량 및 종류, 천공방법 등 발파설계를 위해서 추가적으로 발파암에 대한 세부적인 분류가 필요하다. 일반적으로 RMR 이나 Q 시스템과 같은 암반분류법이 많이 사용되고 있지만, 발파암에 대한 표준적인 암반분류법이 없으며, 국내에서도 발파암 분류에 대한 연구가 거의 전무한 상태로 발파암의 분류요소로 사용될 수 있는 요소를 구하기 위한 연구가 필요하다, 본 논문에서는 앞으로 국내에서 발파암 분류연구에 대한 방향제시를 위해서 발파와 암석의 역학적 특성, 지질구조와 불연속면의 특성과의 관계나 굴착과 관련된 암반분류에 대한 여러 논문사례를 통하여 발파암의 분류 요소와 분류방법 등을 분석한다.
Building tunnels means dealing with what rock is encountered. Relocation of the site of the underground structure is rarely possible. Tunneling engineers and miners have to cope with the quality of the rock mass as it is. Different tunneling philosophies and different rock classification methods hav...
Building tunnels means dealing with what rock is encountered. Relocation of the site of the underground structure is rarely possible. Tunneling engineers and miners have to cope with the quality of the rock mass as it is. Different tunneling philosophies and different rock classification methods have been developed in various countries. Most of the rock classification methods are based on the response of the rock mass to the excavation. Tunnel support requirements could be assessed analytically, supplemented by rock mass classification predictions, and verified by measurements during construction. Rock mass classifications on their own should only be used for preliminary, planning purposes and not for final tunnel support. Design of blast pattern in tunneling projects in Korea is also mostly prepared according to the general rock classification methods such as RMR or Q. They, however, do not take into account the blast performance, and as a consequence, produce poor blasting results. In this paper, the methods of general rock classification and blast design for tunnel excavation in Korea are reviewed, and efforts to develop a new classification method, reflecting the blasting performance, are presented.
Building tunnels means dealing with what rock is encountered. Relocation of the site of the underground structure is rarely possible. Tunneling engineers and miners have to cope with the quality of the rock mass as it is. Different tunneling philosophies and different rock classification methods have been developed in various countries. Most of the rock classification methods are based on the response of the rock mass to the excavation. Tunnel support requirements could be assessed analytically, supplemented by rock mass classification predictions, and verified by measurements during construction. Rock mass classifications on their own should only be used for preliminary, planning purposes and not for final tunnel support. Design of blast pattern in tunneling projects in Korea is also mostly prepared according to the general rock classification methods such as RMR or Q. They, however, do not take into account the blast performance, and as a consequence, produce poor blasting results. In this paper, the methods of general rock classification and blast design for tunnel excavation in Korea are reviewed, and efforts to develop a new classification method, reflecting the blasting performance, are presented.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
문제 정의
They, however, do not take into account the blast performance, and as a consequence, produce poor blasting results. In this paper, the methods of general rock classification and blast design for tunnel excavation in Korea are reviewed, and efforts to develop a new classification method, reflecting the blasting performance, are presented.
제안 방법
In order to find new parameters and establish a new classification for rock blasting, the possibility of the use of several indices was investigated such as Protodyakonov index, cratering index, and blasting coefficient. Protodyakonov's strength coefficient f, is obtained from the drop hammer test for rock samples as follows:
The rock support in NATM can be determined based on the interaction between support and surrounding rock behavior during excavation For the estimation of the total cost of supports and excavation for tunneling project in design stage, another type of rock mass classification is required. The rock mass to be excavated is classified using the data obtained from initial site investigation, and support design is then made based on the classification. In order to estimate the excavation cost, blast pattern should be provided in advance.
참고문헌 (5)
Barton, N., R. Lien and J. Lunde, 1974. Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support, Rock Mech., Vol. 6, pp. 183-236
Barton, N., 1991, Geotechnical Design, WT Focus, World Tunneling, Now
Bieniawski, Z.T., 1973, Engineering classification of jointed rock mass, Trans. South Afr. Ins. of Civ. Eng., Vol. 15, No. 12, pp. 335-344
Bieniawaski, Z.T., 1976, Rock mass classification in rock engineering applications, Proc. Symp. on Exploration for Rock Eng., Balkema, Rotterdam, Vol. 12, pp. 97-106
Bieniawski, Z.T., 1989, Engineering Rock Mass Classifications, John Willy & Sons, 251p
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.