이 연구의 목적은 확대하기 전 근관에서 전자근관장 측정 시의 정확성을 평가하고 확대된 근관에서 파일의 크기에 따른 네 가지 전자근관장 측정기의 정확성을 비교하기 위한 것이다. 발치된 치아 10개를 #10파일을 이용하여 치아의 실제길이를 측정하였다 현미경에서 25배 확대 하에 #10 파일이 치근단공을 넘어 해부학적 치근단공에 이를 때까지 전진하여 디지털 캘리퍼로 측정하였다. Root ZX, Bingo 1020, SmarPex, e-Magic Finder를 알지네이트를 이용한 인체 재현 모델을 이용하여 #10 파일로 apex 표시등에서 측정하였다 (S10). #45까지 핸드 파일로 확대한 다음 #10, #40 파일을 이용하여 전자근관장을 측정하였다. 실제 길이와 각각 측정값의 차이를 계산하여 L10, L40으로 정의하고 기계간의 비교는 one-way ANOVA통계처리하고, Scheffe's multiple range test로 사후 검증하였고, 같은 기계 안의 L10, L40은 Student's t-test로 비교하였다. 본 연구의 실험 조건 하에서, 측정값의 정확도가 기계간에 차이를 보였고, 파일의 크기는 측정값의 정확도에 영향을 주지 못하며, e-Magic Finder는 이 실험 조건하에서 다른 기계에 비해 가장 정확하였다.
이 연구의 목적은 확대하기 전 근관에서 전자근관장 측정 시의 정확성을 평가하고 확대된 근관에서 파일의 크기에 따른 네 가지 전자근관장 측정기의 정확성을 비교하기 위한 것이다. 발치된 치아 10개를 #10파일을 이용하여 치아의 실제길이를 측정하였다 현미경에서 25배 확대 하에 #10 파일이 치근단공을 넘어 해부학적 치근단공에 이를 때까지 전진하여 디지털 캘리퍼로 측정하였다. Root ZX, Bingo 1020, SmarPex, e-Magic Finder를 알지네이트를 이용한 인체 재현 모델을 이용하여 #10 파일로 apex 표시등에서 측정하였다 (S10). #45까지 핸드 파일로 확대한 다음 #10, #40 파일을 이용하여 전자근관장을 측정하였다. 실제 길이와 각각 측정값의 차이를 계산하여 L10, L40으로 정의하고 기계간의 비교는 one-way ANOVA통계처리하고, Scheffe's multiple range test로 사후 검증하였고, 같은 기계 안의 L10, L40은 Student's t-test로 비교하였다. 본 연구의 실험 조건 하에서, 측정값의 정확도가 기계간에 차이를 보였고, 파일의 크기는 측정값의 정확도에 영향을 주지 못하며, e-Magic Finder는 이 실험 조건하에서 다른 기계에 비해 가장 정확하였다.
The purposes of this study were to assess the accuracy of measurements in pre-enlarged canals with small instruments and to compare the accuracies, in enlarged canal, with small size instruments and instruments that match the actual canal diameter using Root ZX, Bingo1020, SmarPex, and e-Magic Finde...
The purposes of this study were to assess the accuracy of measurements in pre-enlarged canals with small instruments and to compare the accuracies, in enlarged canal, with small size instruments and instruments that match the actual canal diameter using Root ZX, Bingo1020, SmarPex, and e-Magic Finder. Ten extracted teeth were embedded in an alginate model made for testing apex locators. A size 10 file was placed into the root canal until the tip of the file reached the plane of the major diameter of the foramen under a dental operating microscope at the 25 x magnification. The measurement was done with digital caliper and defined as actual length. Electronic length measurement with a size 10 file in pre-enlarged canal was done by reading the index indicating Apex of each device to gain a definite value After completion of canal enlargement to a size 45 file, each difference between actual length and electric measurement value with a size 10 and 40 files in enlarged canal was recorded as L10 and L40. The one-way ANOVA and Scheffe's multiple range tests were computed for analyze the differences among the four apex locators in the same group. The Student's t-test between L10 and L40 of each locator was done. The accuracies of electronic measurements were significantly different among the 4 devices. The file size made no difference on the accuracy of electronic measurement in enlarged canal with same device. The e-Magic Finder was the most accurate device among the 4 apex locators used in this study.
The purposes of this study were to assess the accuracy of measurements in pre-enlarged canals with small instruments and to compare the accuracies, in enlarged canal, with small size instruments and instruments that match the actual canal diameter using Root ZX, Bingo1020, SmarPex, and e-Magic Finder. Ten extracted teeth were embedded in an alginate model made for testing apex locators. A size 10 file was placed into the root canal until the tip of the file reached the plane of the major diameter of the foramen under a dental operating microscope at the 25 x magnification. The measurement was done with digital caliper and defined as actual length. Electronic length measurement with a size 10 file in pre-enlarged canal was done by reading the index indicating Apex of each device to gain a definite value After completion of canal enlargement to a size 45 file, each difference between actual length and electric measurement value with a size 10 and 40 files in enlarged canal was recorded as L10 and L40. The one-way ANOVA and Scheffe's multiple range tests were computed for analyze the differences among the four apex locators in the same group. The Student's t-test between L10 and L40 of each locator was done. The accuracies of electronic measurements were significantly different among the 4 devices. The file size made no difference on the accuracy of electronic measurement in enlarged canal with same device. The e-Magic Finder was the most accurate device among the 4 apex locators used in this study.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
가설 설정
1. The accuracies of electronic measurements were significantly different among the 4 devices.
2. The file size had no effect on the accuracy of electronic measurement in large canal with same device.
제안 방법
The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of measurements in pre-enlarged canals with small size instruments using four apex locators and to compare the differences between the measurements, in enlarged canal, with small size instruments and instruments that match the actual canal diameter with each apex locators.
대상 데이터
Ten intact, freshly extracted teeth were selected for study. Before the test, teeth were stored in sterile saline and placed into 5.
데이터처리
, Chicago, IL, USA). The one-way ANOVA and Scheffe s multiple range tests were computed for analyze the differences among the four apex locators in the same group. The Student s t-test between L10 and L40 of each locator was done.
성능/효과
3. The e-Magic Finder is the most accurate of these 4 apex locators, while SmarPex is the worst in all situations.
후속연구
Further studies about the accuracy of various apex locators in various using conditions are needed.
참고문헌 (25)
Sjogren U, Haggluland B, Sunquist G, Wing K. Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod 16:616-618, 1990
Kaufman AY, Katz A. Reliability of Root ZX apex locator tested by an in vitro model. J Endod 19:201 (abstract), 1993
Dunlap CA, Remeikis NA, BeGole EA, Rauschenberger CR. An in vivo evaluation of an electronic apex locator that uses the ratio method in vital and necrotic canals. J Endod 24:48-50, 1998
Mayeda DL, Simon JH, Aimar DF, Finley K. In vivo measurement accuracy in vital and necrotic canals with the Endex apex locator. J Endod 19:545-548, 1993
Nguyen HQ, Kaufman AY, Komowski RC, Friedman S. Electronic length measuring using small and large files in enlarged canals. Int Endod J 29:359-364, 1996
Czerw RJ, Fulkerson MS, Donnelly JC. An in vitro test of a simplified model to demonstrate the operation of electronic root canal measuring devices. J Endod 20:605-606, 1994
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.