창의적 공학교육을 위한 캡스톤 디자인(Capstone Design) 교수활동지원모형 개발 Development of Instructional Activity Support Model for Capstone Design to Creative Engineering Education원문보기
The purpose of this paper is to develop instructional activity support model for capstone design in order for improving creative engineering education. To do this, having extracted the core idea of capstone design, and elicited core learning activity process, and grasped core supportive factors acco...
The purpose of this paper is to develop instructional activity support model for capstone design in order for improving creative engineering education. To do this, having extracted the core idea of capstone design, and elicited core learning activity process, and grasped core supportive factors according to each core learning activity process that elicited, an improved instructional design model for capstone design was then developed through formative evaluation with respect to the draft of the instructional system development model for capstone design. As to major research methods, case analysis, requirements analysis through interview, and formative evaluation by experts were employed, and then research studies were undertaken. The formative evaluation by experts was carried out for two hours in 2007, and the experts participated in the evaluation consisted of total 6 persons: two specialists of capstone design contents, two professionals in field works, and two expert instructional designers in education engineering. Interview results had been reflected in this research when developing final instructional design model for capstone design. The core learning activity process of the final instructional design model for caption design, which developed in this research, comprises following stages: (1) Team building $\rightarrow$ (2) Integrated meeting between industry and academy $\rightarrow$ (3) Analysis of tasks $\rightarrow$ (4) Clarification of tasks $\rightarrow$(5) Seeking solutions for issues $\rightarrow$ (6) Eliciting priority of solutions $\rightarrow$ (7) Designing solutions and construction $\rightarrow$ (8) Exhibiting outcomes and presentation $\rightarrow$(9) Gaining comprehensive insights Also, in the core learning activity process, supportive factors that support implementation of each step were presented having been categorized into facilitator (teacher, and professionals in field works), learner and tool, etc.
The purpose of this paper is to develop instructional activity support model for capstone design in order for improving creative engineering education. To do this, having extracted the core idea of capstone design, and elicited core learning activity process, and grasped core supportive factors according to each core learning activity process that elicited, an improved instructional design model for capstone design was then developed through formative evaluation with respect to the draft of the instructional system development model for capstone design. As to major research methods, case analysis, requirements analysis through interview, and formative evaluation by experts were employed, and then research studies were undertaken. The formative evaluation by experts was carried out for two hours in 2007, and the experts participated in the evaluation consisted of total 6 persons: two specialists of capstone design contents, two professionals in field works, and two expert instructional designers in education engineering. Interview results had been reflected in this research when developing final instructional design model for capstone design. The core learning activity process of the final instructional design model for caption design, which developed in this research, comprises following stages: (1) Team building $\rightarrow$ (2) Integrated meeting between industry and academy $\rightarrow$ (3) Analysis of tasks $\rightarrow$ (4) Clarification of tasks $\rightarrow$(5) Seeking solutions for issues $\rightarrow$ (6) Eliciting priority of solutions $\rightarrow$ (7) Designing solutions and construction $\rightarrow$ (8) Exhibiting outcomes and presentation $\rightarrow$(9) Gaining comprehensive insights Also, in the core learning activity process, supportive factors that support implementation of each step were presented having been categorized into facilitator (teacher, and professionals in field works), learner and tool, etc.
이석순(2004). 경상대학교 Capstone Design 운영 방법과 문제점, 공학교육학회지, P. 305
이재열.이주영.김재필(2005). 서울대학교 시니어 캡스톤 프로그램 연구보고서, 서울대학교
정주영(2007). 블렌디드 액션러닝(Blended Action Learning) 지원시스템 개발, 부산대학교대학원 박사학위논문
조선대학교 첨단부품사업단(2005). [산업자원부] 서울대 등 7개대, '05년 창의적 설계 인력양성 사업 신규참여, 보도자료(2005. 5. 19)
한양대학교 산학협력중심대학 육성사업단(2006), 교육프로그램 소개, 한양대학교 홈페이지 (http://ieng.hanyang.ac.kr/indexA4.html)
Akker, J, V. D.(1999) Principles and methods of development research. In Akker, J, D., Branch R. M. Kent, G., & Nieveen N. Plomp, T. (ebs.). Design approached and tools in education and training. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Acaedmic Publishers. 8-14
Davis, Denny c., Mckenzie, Larry J., Trevisan, Michael S., Beyerlein, Steven W.(2004). Capstone Design Courses and Assessment: A national S]tudy. American Society for Engineering Education
Edward Lumsdaine, Monica Lumsdaine(1994). Creative Problem Solving: Thinking Skills for A Changing World. Mcgraw-Hill College. 명지대학교 창의공학 연구회(역) (2001). 창의적 문제해결과 공학설계, 파워북
Eisenhardt, K. M.(1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550
Lincoln, Yvonna S., & Guba, Egon G.(1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
Moore, P. D., Cupp, S.,& Fortenberry, N. L. (2004). Linking student learning outcomes to instructional practices-phase i. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City
Murphy, P. D.(2003). Capstone experience. Retrieved January 3, 2004, from North Dakota State University Web site: http://www.ndsu.edu/ndsu/accreditation/assessment/capstone_Experience.htm
Osbom, A.(1963), Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative thinking. New York: Scribner's
Puccio, G. J., Murdock, M. C., & Mance, M. (2005). Current development in creative problem solving for organization: A Focus on thinking skills and styles. The KOREA JOURNAL OF THINKING & PROBLEM SOLVING, 15(2), 43-76
Reigeluth(1999) Instructional-design theories and models(A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory), Lawrence Erlbaum Association
Richey, R. C.(1986). The theoretual and conceptual based of instructional design. New York: Nichols Publishing Co
Tan, Seng Chee(2000). Supporting collaborative problem-solving through computer-supported collaborative argumentation. The Pennsylvania State University
Treffinger, D. J, Isaksen, S. G, & Dorval, K. B.(1994), Creativity Problem Solving: An Overview. In M. A. Runco. (Eds). NorWood. NJ: Ablex
Wagenaar, T. C.(1993). The capstone course. Teaching Sociology, 21, 209-214
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.