$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
안녕하세요!
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

Abstract

Objective : The objective of this review was to provide reliable comparative results regarding the effectiveness of any interventions either open or closed that can be used in the management of fractured mandibular condyle Patients and Methods : Research of studies from MEDLINE and Cochrane since 1990 was done. Controlled vocabulary terms were used. MeSH Terms were "Mandibular condyle" AND "Fractures, bone". Only comparative study were considered in this review using the "limit" function. According to the criteria, two review authors independently assessed the abstracts of studies resulting from the searches. The studies were divided according to some criteria, and following were measured: Ramus height, condyle sagittal displacement, condyle Towns's image displacement, Maximum open length, Protrusion & Lateral excursion, TMJ pain, Malocclusion, and TMJ disorder. Results : Many studies were analyzed to review the post-operative result of the two methods of treatment. Ramus height decreased more in when treated by closed reduction as opposed to open reduction. Sagittal condyle displacement was shown to be greater in closed reduction. Condyle Town's image condyle displacement had greater values in closed reduction. Maximum open length showed lower values in closed reduction. In protrusive and lateral movement, closed reduction was less than ORIF. Closed reduction showed greater occurrence of malocclusion than ORIF. However, post-operative pain and discomfort was greater in ORIF. Conclusion : In almost all categories, ORIF showed better results than CRIF. However, the use of the open reduction method should be considered due to the potential surgical morbidity and increased hospitalization time and cost. To these days, Endoscopic surgical techniques for ORIF (EORIF) are now in their infancy with the specific aims of eliminating concern for damage to the facial nerve and of reducing or eliminating facial scars. Before performing any types of treatment, patients must be understood of both of the treatment methods, and the best treatment method should be taken on permission.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. De Riu G, Gamba U, Anghinoni M, Sesenna E: A comparison of open and closed treatment of condylar fractures: a change in philosophy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;30(5):384-9 
  2. Ellis E, 3rd, Simon P, Throckmorton GS: Occlusal results after open or closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58(3):260-8 
  3. Ellis E, 3rd, Throckmorton G. Facial symmetry after closed and open treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58(7):719-28; discussion 29-30 
  4. Konstantinovic VS, Dimitrijevic B: Surgical versus conservative treatment of unilateral condylar process fractures: clinical and radiographic evaluation of 80 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;50(4):349-52; discussion 52-3 
  5. Throckmorton GS, Ellis E, 3rd. Recovery of mandibular motion after closed and open treatment of unilateral mandibular condylar process fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;29(6):421-7 
  6. Takenoshita Y, Ishibashi H, Oka M: Comparison of functional recovery after nonsurgical and surgical treatment of condylar fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48(11):1191-5 
  7. Ishihama K, Iida S, Kimura T, Koizumi H, Yamazawa M, Kogo M: Comparison of surgical and nonsurgical treatment of bilateral condylar fractures based on maximal mouth opening. Cranio 2007;25(1):16-22 
  8. Throckmorton GS, Ellis E, 3rd, Hayasaki H. Masticatory motion after surgical or nonsurgical treatment for unilateral fractures of the mandibular condylar process. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62(2):127-38 
  9. M. Todd Brandt RH, Haug: Open Versus Closed Reduction of Adult Mandibular Condyle Fractures : A Review of the Literature Regarding the Evolution of Current Thoughts on Management. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:1324-32 
  10. Worsaae N, Thorn JJ: Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of unilateral dislocated low subcondylar fractures: a clinical study of 52 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52(4):353-60; discussion 60-1 
  11. Lee C SM, Young DM: Cranial nerve VII region of the traumatized facial skeleton : Optimizing fracture repair with the endoscope. J Trauma 2000;48(423) 
  12. Eckelt U, Schneider M, Erasmus F, Gerlach KL, Kuhlisch E, Loukota R, et al.: Open versus closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process-a prospective randomized multi-centre study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2006;34(5):306-14 
  13. Hlawitschka M LR, Eckelt U: Functional and radiological results of open and closed treatment if intracapsular (diacapitular) condylar fractures of the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;34(6):597-604 
  14. Lauer G SR: Endoscope-assisted fixation of mandibular condylar process fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57(36) 
  15. Widmark G, Bagenholm T, Kahnberg KE, Lindahl L: Open reduction of subcondylar fractures. A study of functional rehabilitation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;25(2):107-11 
  16. Palmieri C, Ellis E, 3rd, Throckmorton G. Mandibular motion after closed and open treatment of unilateral mandibular condylar process fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57(7):764-75; discussion 75-6 
  17. Santler G, Karcher H, Ruda C, Kole E: Fractures of the condylar process: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57(4):392-7; discussion 97-8 
  18. Yang WG, Chen CT, Tsay PK, Chen YR: Functional results of unilateral mandibular condylar process fractures after open and closed treatment. J Trauma 2002;52(3):498-503 
  19. Stiesch-Scholz M, Schmidt S, Eckardt A: Condylar motion after open and closed treatment of mandibular condylar fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63(9):1304-9 
  20. Haug RH, Assael LA: Outcomes of open versus closed treatment of mandibular subcondylar fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59(4):370-5; discussion 75-6 

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • ScienceON :

원문 URL 링크

원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. (원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기)

상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일