• 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보


Objectives : To introduce and compare various headache measurement tools, in order to provide fundamental information for future clinical trials and development of oriental medicine measurement tools. Methods : Eight headache assessment scales, Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire(MQoLQ), Migraine-Specific Quality of Life(MSQOL), Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire(MSQ), The Headache Impact Questionnaire(HImQ), Headcahe Needs Assessment Survey(HANA), Henry Ford Headache disability Inventory(HDI), Migraine Disablity Assessment Scale(MIDAS) and Headache Impact Test(HIT-6), were searched through Pubmed. General character, the process of development, verification of reliability, internal consistency, responsiveness to patient's change and validity were reviewed. Results : In assessing the quality of life of migraine patients, MQoLQ can be used to measure the change within 24 hours, MSQ and MSQOL can be used to measure the change during a relatively longer period of time. The frequency and bothersomeness of headache can be easily measured by HANA. HImQ can be used to measure the intensity of headache and the influence on normal daily activities. HDI can measure the emotional difficulties of headache patients. HIT-6 and MIDAS makes measurements possible in a short period of time, and the reliability and validity have been verified numerously. HIT-6 and MIDAS are the most frequently used measurement tools because they are simple and easy for both the assessor and the patient to understand and use. Conclusions : In this study, various headache assessment tools have been reviewed. The assessed tools were widely used after being verified for their reliability and validity. We hope this study provides fundamental information in establishing future clinical trial and clinical practice guidelines. We also hope this study to contribute to the development of an oriental medicine assessment tool for headache.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. Kenneth W, Lindsay IB. 이광우. 임상신경학. 3판. 서울 : 범문사. 2002 : 111. 
  2. Schwartz BS, Stewart WF, Simon D, Lipton RB. Epidemiology of tension-type headache. JAMA. 1998 ; 279(5) : 381-3. 
  3. Jacobson GP et al. The Henry Ford Hospital Headache Disability Inventory (HDI). Neurology. 1994 ; 44(5) : 837-42. 
  4. Kosinski M et al. A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact : the HIT-6. Qual Life Res. 2003 ; 12(8) : 963-74. 
  5. Herndon RM. Handbook of neurologic rating scales. 2nd. USA : Demos Medical Publising. 2006 : 297-343. 
  6. 문희수, 정진상, 이혜승, 박혜선, 김선우, 우행원. 한국인 편두통 환자에서 MSQoL(Migraine-Specific Quality of Life) 설문조사의 신뢰도 및 타당도. 대한신경과학회지. 2003 ; 21(2) : 146-55. 
  7. Shin HE et al. Headache Impact Test-6(HIT- 6) Scores for Migraine Patients : Their Relation to Disability as Measured from a Headache Diary. J Clin Neurol. 2008 ; 4(4) : 158-63. 
  8. Muller U et al. Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part I : validation. Eur Spine J. 2004 ; 13(4) : 301-13. 
  9. Stewart WF et al. Development and testing of the Migraine Disability Assessment(MIDAS) Questionnaire to assess headache-related disability. Neurology. 2001 ; 56(6 Suppl 1) : S20-8. 
  10. Hartmaier SL et al. Development of a brief 24-hour migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire. Headache. 1995 ; 35(6) : 320-9. 
  11. Jhingran P et al. Development and validation of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. Headache. 1998 ; 38(4) : 295-302. 
  12. Martin BC et al. Validity and reliability of the migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire (MSQ Version 2.1). Headache. 2000 ; 40(3) : 204-15. 
  13. Jhingran P et al. MSQ : Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. Further investigation of the factor structure. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 ; 13(6) : 707-17. 
  14. Cole JC, P Lin and MF Rupnow. Minimal important differences in the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) version. Cephalalgia. 2009 ; 29(11) : 1180-7. 
  15. Ohbu S et al. Development and testing of the Japanese version of the migraine-specific quality of life instrument. Qual Life Res. 2004 ; 13(8) : 1489-93. 
  16. Passchier J et al. Evaluation of the Dutch version of the migraine quality of life instrument(MSQOL) and its application in headache coping. Cephalalgia. 2001 ; 21(8) : 823-9. 
  17. McKenna SP, LC Doward and KM Davey. The Development and Psychometric Properties of the MSQOL : A Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Instrument. Clin Drug Investig. 1998 ; 15(5) : 413-23. 
  18. Cramer JA, SD Silberstein and P Winner. Development and validation of the Headache Needs Assessment(HANA) survey. Headache. 2001 ; 41(4) : 402-9. 
  19. Jacobson GP et al. Headache disability inventory (HDI) : short-term test-retest reliability and spouse perceptions. Headache. 1995 ; 35(9) : 534-9. 
  20. Stewart WF et al. Validity of an illness severity measure for headache in a population sample of migraine sufferers. Pain. 1999 ; 79(2-3) : 291-301. 
  21. Stewart WF et al. Reliability of an illness severity measure for headache in a population sample of migraine sufferers. Cephalalgia. 1998 ; 18(1) : 44-51. 
  22. 이혜승, 정진상, 송희정, 박혜선. 한국인 편두통 환자에서 MIDAS (Migraine Disability Assessment) 설문조사의 신뢰도 및 타당성. 대한신경과학회지. 2000 ; 18(3) : 287-91. 
  23. Stewart WF, RB Lipton and K Kolodner. Migraine Disability Assessment(MIDAS) Score : Relation to Headache Frequency, Pain Intensity, and Headache Symptoms. Headache : The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2003 ; 43(3) : 258-65. 
  24. Stewart WF et al. An international study to assess reliability of the Migraine Disability Assessment(MIDAS) score. Neurology. 1999 ; 53(5) : 988-94. 
  25. Stewart WF et al. Validity of the Migraine Disability Assessment(MIDAS) score in comrison to a diary-based measure in a population sample of migraine sufferers. Pain. 2000 ; 88(1) : 41-52. 
  26. Lipton RB et al. Clinical utility of an instrument assessing migraine disability: the Migraine Disability Assessment(MIDAS) questionnaire. Headache. 2001 ; 41(9) : 854-61. 
  27. Stewart WF et al. Reliability of the migraine disability assessment score in a populationbased sample of headache sufferers. Cephalalgia. 1999 ; 19(2) : 107-14 ; discussion 74. 
  28. Sauro KM et al. HIT-6 and MIDAS as Measures of Headache Disability in a Headache Referral Population. Headache. 2009 : 1-13. 
  29. Bjorner JB, M Kosinski and JE Ware Jr, Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches : an application of item response theory to the headache impact test (HIT). Qual Life Res. 2003 ; 12(8) : 913-33. 
  30. 주민경, 임형준, 주영수, 김주용, 김윤중, 유경호, 마효일, 이병철. 한국어판 두통영향 검사(Headache Impact Test-6)의 타당도 및 신뢰도 조사. 대한신경과학회지. 2009 ; 27(1) : 1-5. 
  31. Bayliss MS et al. A study of the feasibility of Internet administration of a computerized health survey : the headache impact test(HIT). Qual Life Res. 2003 ; 12(8) : 953-61. 
  32. Chatterton ML et al. Reliability and validity of the migraine therapy assessment questionnaire. Headache. 2002 ; 42(10) : 1006-15. 
  33. Davis KH, L Black and B Sleath. Validation of the Patient Perception of Migraine Questionnaire. Value Health. 2002 ; 5(5) : 422-30. 
  34. Pathak DS, DJ Chisolm and KA Weis. Functional Assessment in Migraine(FAIM) questionnaire : development of an instrument based upon the WHO's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Value Health. 2005 ; 8(5) : 591-600. 
  35. Hansen JS, L Bendtsen and R Jensen. Psychometric properties of the Danish versions of headache-specific locus of control scale and headache management self-efficacy scale. J Headache Pain. 2009 ; 10(5) : 341-7. 
  36. Lipton RB et al. Validity and reliability of the Migraine-Treatment Optimization Questionnaire. Cephalalgia. 2009 ; 29(7) : 751-9. 
  37. Patrick DL et al. Measuring satisfaction with migraine treatment : expectations, importance, outcomes, and global ratings. Clin Ther. 2003 ; 25(11) : 2920-35. 
  38. Niere K and A Quin. Development of a headachespecific disability questionnaire for patients attending physiotherapy. Man Ther. 2009 ; 14(1) : 45-51. 
  39. Patrick DL, BC Hurst and J Hughes. Further development and testing of the migraine-specific quality of life(MSQOL) measure. Headache. 2000 ; 40(7) : 550-60. 
  40. 네이버 백과사전. Available from : URL : http://100.naver.com/100.nhn? docid=145472. 
  41. Stevens SS. On the Theory of Scales of Measurement. Science. 1946 ; 103(2684) : 677-80. 
  42. Holmes WF et al. Information about migraine disability influences physicians' perceptions of illness severity and treatment needs. Headache. 2001 ; 41(4) : 343-50. 
  43. Santanello NC et al. Validation of a new quality of life questionnaire for acute migraine headache. Headache. 1995 ; 35(6) : 330-7. 
  44. Wagner TH et al. A new instrument to assess the long-term quality of life effects from migraine : development and psychometric testing of the MSQOL. Headache. 1996 ; 36(8) : 484-92. 
  45. Bauer B et al. Psychosocial handicap due to chronic headaches. Evaluation of the inventory of Disabilities caused by Headache. Nervenarzt. 1999 ; 70(6) : 522-9. 
  46. Gandek B et al. Translating the Short-Form Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) in 27 countries : methodological and conceptual issues. Qual Life Res. 2003 ; 12(8) : 975-9. 
  47. French DJ et al. Perceived self-efficacy and headache-related disability. Headache. 2000 ; 40(8) : 647-56. 

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (2)

  1. Park, Byung-Joo ; Shin, Hyun-Sang ; Kang, Mi-Jeong ; Lee, Ji-Won ; Jang, Hyun-Su ; Lee, Jun-Hee ; Lee, Eui-Ju ; Koh, Byeong-Hee 2010. "Two Cases of Repetitive Episodic Tension-type Headache Patients who were Constitutionally Typed as Soyangin and Taeeumin" 사상체질의학회지 = Journal of Sasang Constitutional Medicine, 22(2): 123~134 
  2. Bae, Dal-Bit ; Lyu, Yun-Sun ; Park, Jong-Min ; Kang, Hyoung-Won ; Lyu, Yeoung-Su 2013. "A Preliminary Comparison of Efficacy of Needle-Embedding Therapy with Acupuncture for Chronic Tension-type Headache Patients" 동의신경정신과학회지 = Journal of oriental neuropsychiatry, 24(1): 45~62 


원문 PDF 다운로드

  • ScienceON :

원문 URL 링크

원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. (원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기)

상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

이 논문과 연관된 기능

DOI 인용 스타일