• 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보


The sales volume of men's cosmetics has drastically increased in Korea. In recent years, men's needs for cosmetics have been diversified and the consumer demand for functional cosmetics has greatly risen. In particular, male consumers have become more interested in essence product that is a light and concentrated treatment to correct skin problems. This research analyzes consumer preferences for essence-for-men through the use of choice-based conjoint analysis. This approach is adopted since the task of respondents to choose the most preferred option from several alternatives closely mimics actual marketplace purchasing behavior by consumers. New technique for the construction of choice sets is suggested based on the balanced incomplete block design, to accommodate a larger number of product profiles. The proposed design for choice sets is balanced and provides a tool to filter the contradictory choices. Conjoint analyses are performed to assess the relative importance of attributes and identify the most preferred profile of essence-for-men with respect to attributes such as emphasized function, price, type of content, and design of container. Some differences are indicated in the analysis results between age brackets as well as between groups classified by the amount of fashion item expenditures.

저자의 다른 논문

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Berkson, J. (1955). Maximum likelihood and minimum Chi-square estimates of the logistic function, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50, 130-162. 
  2. Cassab, H. (2009). Investigating the dynamics of service attributes in multi-channel environments, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16, 25-30. 
  3. Chakraborty, G., Ball, D., Gaeth, G. J. and Jun, S. (2002). The ability of rating and choice conjoint to predict market shares: A Monte Carlo simulation, Journal of Business Research, 55, 237-249. 
  4. Cohen, S. H. (1997). Perfect union: CBCA marries the best of conjoint and discrete choice models, Marketing Research, 9, 12-17. 
  5. DeSarbo, W. S., Ramaswamy, V. and Cohen, S. H. (1995). Market segmentation with choice-based conjoint analysis, Marketing Letters, 6, 137-147. 
  6. Elrod, T., Louviere, J. J. and Davey, K. S. (1992). An empirical comparison of rating-based and choice-based conjoint models, Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 368-377. 
  7. Gensler, S., Hinz, O., Skiera, B. and Theysohn, S. (2012). Willingness-to-pay estimation with choice-based conjoint analysis: Addressing extreme response behavior with individually adapted designs, European Journal of Operation Research, 219, 368-378. 
  8. Giancristofaro, R. A. (2003). A new conjoint analysis procedure with application to marketing research, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 32, 2271-2283. 
  9. Green, P. E., Krieger, A. M. and Wind, Y. (2001). Thirty years of conjoint analysis: Reflections and prospects, Interfaces, 31, 56-73. 
  10. Green, P. E. and Srinivasan, V. (1990). Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice, Journal of Marketing, 54, 3-19. 
  11. Haaijer, R., Kamakura, W. and Wedel, M. (2001). The 'no-choice' alternative in conjoint choice experiments, International Journal of Market Research, 43, 93-106. 
  12. Hong, J. K. (2008). A study on skin recognition and cosmetics use necessity in men by age, Journal of the Korean Society of Cosmetology, 14, 1230-1243. 
  13. Jeon, H. R. and Jae, M. K. (2009). 20s-30s men's cosmetics purchase decision factors, Journal of Korean Association of Human Ecology, 18, 1237-1246. 
  14. Johnson, R. M. and Orme, B. K. (1996). How many questions should you ask in choice-based conjoint studies? Research Paper Series, Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software Inc. 
  15. Kim, B. Y. (2005). Conjoint analysis for the development of new cellular phone, Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, 33, 103-110. 
  16. Kuhfeld, W. F. and Tobias, R. D. (2005). Large factorial designs for product engineering and marketing research applications, Technometrics, 47, 132-141. 
  17. Kuhfeld, W. F., Tobias, R. D. and Garratt, M. (1994). Efficient experimental design with marketing research applications, Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 545-557. 
  18. Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., Neter, J. and Li, W. (2005). Applied Linear Statistical Models, McGraw Hill. 
  19. Marshall, P. and Bradlow, E. T. (2002). A unified approach to conjoint analysis models, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 674-682. 
  20. Meibner, M. and Decker, R. (2009). Eye-tracking information processing in choice-based conjoint analysis, International Journal of Market Research, 52, 591-610. 
  21. Moore, W. L. (2004). A Cross-validity comparison of rating-based and choice-based conjoint analysis models, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 299-312. 
  22. Park, E. J. (2008). Men's actual usage and purchase pattern of cosmetics according to their appearancerelated attitude, Journal of the Korean Society of Fashion and Beauty, 6, 267-277. 
  23. Ramaswamy, V. and Cohen, S. H. (2001). Latent class models for conjoint analysis, Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Application, ed. Gustafsson, A., Herrmann, A., and Huber, F., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 415-446. 
  24. Shin, Y. J., Kim, B. Y. and Hyun, Y. J. (2007). Conjoint analysis for the effects of cigarette warning label and packaging on intention to quit, Journal of Health and Social Affairs, 27, 27-51. 
  25. Toubia, O., Hauser, J. R. and Simester, D. I. (2004). Polyhedral methods for adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis, Journal of Marketing Research, 41, 116-131. 
  26. Wittink, D. R., Vriens, M. and Burhenne, W. (1994). Commercial use of conjoint analysis in Europe: Results and critical reflections, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11, 41-52. 

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (1)

  1. Kim, Bu-Yong 2014. "An Empirical Comparison of Predictability of Ranking-based and Choice-based Conjoint Analysis" 응용통계연구 = The Korean journal of applied statistics, 27(5): 681~691 


원문 PDF 다운로드

  • ScienceON :

원문 URL 링크

원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. 원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기

상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일