선택한 단어 수는 입니다.
최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
선택한 단어 수는 30입니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
제안 방법
- After the RDC/TMD questionnaires were completed, clinical examination was performed according to the RDC/TMD. The clinical examination involves clinical assessment of TMD signs and symptoms including pain site, mandibular range of motion and associated pain, joint sounds, muscles and joint palpation or tenderness.
- The clinical examination involves clinical assessment of TMD signs and symptoms including pain site, mandibular range of motion and associated pain, joint sounds, muscles and joint palpation or tenderness. For evaluation of the existence of contributing factors, the 17 parafunctional habits (sleep bruxism, daytime clenching clenching, perioral contraction, tongue thrusting, frequent hard food mastication, unilateral chewing, unilateral sleep, high pillow, biting something, irregular diet, chin buttressing, coffee, insomnia, indigestion, bad posture, much talking, cold weather) were assessed using standardized questionnaire used in our clinic.
- Method of assessing depression and somatization was derived from Symptom Checklist-90-Revision (SCL-90-R). Participants responded to 13 items of depression parameter and 7 items of additional parameter of SCL-90-R, and then resultant raw mean score was regarded as depression scale. Somatization scale was also obtained by raw mean score from the responses to 12 items of non-specific physical symptoms of SCL-90-R.
- RDC/TMD axis II history questionnaire was administered to each patient before treatment. We used a systematically translated Korean version of RDC/TMD.
- Two hundred and fifty two TMD patients were selected and divided into three groups based on the RDC/TMD axis I diagnostic guidelines; myogenous pain group, arthrogenous pain group, and mixed pain group. RDC/TMD axis II profiles, contributing factors, clinical findings, and treatment outcomes of three TMD subgroups were analyzed. Myogenous pain group had higher depression (p=0.
- After the RDC/TMD questionnaires were completed, clinical examination was performed according to the RDC/TMD. The clinical examination involves clinical assessment of TMD signs and symptoms including pain site, mandibular range of motion and associated pain, joint sounds, muscles and joint palpation or tenderness. For evaluation of the existence of contributing factors, the 17 parafunctional habits (sleep bruxism, daytime clenching clenching, perioral contraction, tongue thrusting, frequent hard food mastication, unilateral chewing, unilateral sleep, high pillow, biting something, irregular diet, chin buttressing, coffee, insomnia, indigestion, bad posture, much talking, cold weather) were assessed using standardized questionnaire used in our clinic.
- The history questionnaire includes three questions to grade pain intensity: one for the actual pain, one for maximal pain in the last 6 months, and one for average pain in the last 6 months. The response options for each of three items were based on the ordinal rating of 0 to 10 scales.
- The parameters of psychological profiles including depression and somatization, jaw disability, pain intensity, disability days, and graded chronic pain scale were analyzed. Method of assessing depression and somatization was derived from Symptom Checklist-90-Revision (SCL-90-R).
- A total of 308 (61 male and 237 female) consecutive patients with TMD who visited at the Orofacial Pain Clinic of Seoul National University Dental Hospital, were recruited. The patients were divided into three groups based on the RDC/TMD axis I diagnostic guidelines14); Group A- patients with only myogenous pain, Group B- patients with only arthrogenous pain, and Group C- patients with both myogenous pain and arthrogenous pain (mixed pain). Of the 308 patients, 56 were excluded because of no symptoms of pain or not fit in the criteria described below.
- The purposes of this study were to compare psychological profiles, to investigate the differences in the clinical characteristics, and to compare treatment outcomes among myogenous pain, arthrogenous pain, and mixed pain subgroups of TMD using Korean version of RDC/TMD.
- TMD refer to a collection of medical and dental conditions affecting the TMJ and/or the muscles of mastication, as well as contiguous tissue components. The purposes of this study were to compare psychological profiles, to investigate the differences in the clinical characteristics, and to compare treatment outcomes between myogenous pain and arthrogenous pain groups of TMD based on RDC/TMD.
대상 데이터
- A total of 308 (61 male and 237 female) consecutive patients with TMD who visited at the Orofacial Pain Clinic of Seoul National University Dental Hospital, were recruited. The patients were divided into three groups based on the RDC/TMD axis I diagnostic guidelines14); Group A- patients with only myogenous pain, Group B- patients with only arthrogenous pain, and Group C- patients with both myogenous pain and arthrogenous pain (mixed pain).
- Two hundred and fifty two TMD patients were selected and divided into three groups based on the RDC/TMD axis I diagnostic guidelines; myogenous pain group, arthrogenous pain group, and mixed pain group. RDC/TMD axis II profiles, contributing factors, clinical findings, and treatment outcomes of three TMD subgroups were analyzed.
데이터처리
- One-way ANOVA was used to analyze separately the differences between the three groups on pain intensity, disability days, graded chronic pain scale, depression, nonspecific physical symptoms (pain item included), nonspecific physical symptoms (pain item excluded) and jaw disability. Chi-square tests were used for analyzing group differences on bruxism, clenching, unilateral chewing, insomnia, and headache.
- Table 5. Standardized coefficients of gender, age, and RDC/TMD axis II profiles on the treatment effectiveness in the multiple linear regression model.
이론/모형
- The parameters of psychological profiles including depression and somatization, jaw disability, pain intensity, disability days, and graded chronic pain scale were analyzed. Method of assessing depression and somatization was derived from Symptom Checklist-90-Revision (SCL-90-R). Participants responded to 13 items of depression parameter and 7 items of additional parameter of SCL-90-R, and then resultant raw mean score was regarded as depression scale.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.