최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국지구과학회지 = Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, v.34 no.2, 2013년, pp.148 - 161
정덕호 (전북대학교 과학교육학부) , 조규성 (전북대학교 과학교육학부) , 유대영 (전북대학교 과학교육학부)
The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship between the communication status in group and the semantic network of science gifted students. Seven small groups, 5 members in each, participated in small group activities, in which they discussed the calculation of earth density. Both th...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
집단에서의 의사소통은 어떤 특성을 나타내는가? | 이런 집단에서의 의사소통 과정에서는 구성원들 간에 집단 작업, 과제, 계획, 목표 등에 주로 초점을 둔 과제적 상호작용(task interaction)과 집단생활의 대인적이거나 사회적 측면에 초점을 둔 관계적 상호작용(relationship interaction)이 발생하기도 한다(Bales, 1999). 즉, 집단에서의 의사소통은 집단 구성원을 통제하고, 감정을 표현하고, 다른 사람들을 움직이게 하며, 정보를 교환하는 등의 기능을 수행함으로써 구성원들의 성과, 활동, 사고 및 경험들이 다른 구성원들에게 영향을 미치는 상호의존적(interdependence)인 특성을 나타낸다(Wageman, 2001). 특히 구성원들간의 언어적 상호작용은 개인이 다른 사람에게 메시지를 전달하거나 받아들임으로써 집단의 성과에 영향을 미치게 된다(Huyn, 2010). | |
집단의 의사소통 과정에서 한 구성원이 다른 구성원에게 얼마나 많은 영향을 미치는가는 두 가지 측면에 결정되는데 그 측면들은 무엇인가? | 집단의 의사소통 과정에서 한 구성원이 다른 구성원에게 얼마나 많은 영향을 미치는 가는 두 가지 측면에서 결정된다. 하나는 양적인 측면에서 집단의 한 사람이 다른 구성원들과 얼마나 많은 빈도로 상호작용을 하고 있는가를 통하여 그 영향력을 확인할 수 있고, 다른 하나는 질적인 측면에서 한 번의 상호작용이라도 얼마나 큰 강도로 영향력을 행사할 수 있는가를 통하여 확인할 수 있다. 즉, 두 차원에서 정보교환의 중심적 위치에 있는 사람은 그렇지 않은 사람에 비해 큰 영향력을 미치게 되기 때문에(Nam et al. | |
Driskell and Mullen(1990)은 무엇을 함으로써 지위 분화가 된다고 주장하였는가? | , 1986). 많은 연구자들이 이런 지위 분화에 대해 설명하고 있는데 Driskell and Mullen(1990)은 먼저 집단 구성원 중 하나가 자신의 특정적 및 확산적 지위 특성을 보여주면 다른 구성원들은 그 하나의 역량에 대해 높은 기대감을 형성하며, 집단 성원들은 그 하나가 그들에게 영향력을 행사하는 것을 허용함으로써 지위가 분화된다고 하였다. Berger et al. |
Anderson, J.R., 1983, A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261-295.
Bales, R.F., 1999, Social interaction systems: Theory and measurement. New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA, 396 p.
Barsalou, L.W., 1983, Ad hoc categories. Memory and congnition, 11, 211-227.
Benne, K.D. and Sheats, P., 1948, Functional roles of group members. Journal of Social Issues, 4, 41-49.
Bennett, J., Hogrth, S., Lubben, F., Cambell, B., and Robinson, A., 2010, Talking Science: The Research Evidence on the Use of Small Group Discussions in Science Teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 69-95.
Berger, J., Wagner, D.G., and Zelditch, M.Jr., 1992, A working strategy for constructing theories: State organizing processes. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Studies in metatheorizing in sociology. Thousand Oaks, California, USA, 39-53.
Chung, M.H. and Oh, H.S., 2007, Human capital, social capital, and work group performance. Korean Journal of Management, 15, 91-122. (in Korean)
Cohen, E.G., 1994, Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1-35.
Collins, A.M. and Loftus, E.F., 1975, A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
Driskell, J.E. and Mullen, B., 1990, Status, expectations, and behavior: A meta-analytic review and test of theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 541-553.
Fiske, S.T. and Goodwin, S.A., 1994, Social cognition research and small group research, a West Side Story or ...? Small Group Research, 25, 147-171.
Godfrey, D.K., Jones, E.E., and Lord, C.G., 1986, Selfpromotion is not ingratiating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 106-115.
Granovetter, M.S., 1973, The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
Hare, A.P., 1994, Types of roles in small groups: A bit of history and a current perspective. Small Group Research, 25, 433-448.
Huyn, Y.S., 2010, An Structural Equation Model Analysis among Social Networks, Knowledge Sharing and Learning Transfer in Community of Practices. Journal of Korean HRD Research, 5, 39-59. (in Korean)
Jeon, K.M., Yeo, K.H., and Noh, T.H., 2000, The relationships between verbal behaviors and chemistry problem solving ability in cooperative learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 20, 234-243. (in Korean)
Jhun, Y.S. and Hwang, H.J., 2010, Analysis on student-tostudent verbal interaction during small group open inquiry activities. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 21, 227-246. (in Korean)
Johnson, A.G., 1995, The Blackwell dictionary of sociology: A user's guide to sociological language. Malden, Massachusetts, USA, 125 p.
Kang, B.M., 2010, Constructing Networks of Related Concepts Based on Co-occurring Nouns. Korean Semantics, 32, 1-28. (in Korea)
Kim, K.J. and Chung, B.K., 2008, A study on the moderating effects of information system characteristic between social capital and knowledge sharing. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 15, 1-18. (in Korean)
Kim, Y.H., 2011, Social Network Analysis. Parkyoungsa, Seoul, Korea, 281 p. (in Korean)
Lee, H.J., Lee, D.I., and Lee, J.H., 2010, Development of franchise education program through semantic network analysis. Management Education Review, 14, 105-128. (in Korea)
Lee, J.K. and Ha, J.S., 2012, Semantic network analysis of science gifted middle school students' understanding of fact, hypothesis, theory, law, and scientificness. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32, 823-840.
Lee, S.Y., Kim, C.J., Choe, S.U., Yoo, J.H., Park, H.J., Kang, E.H., and Kim, H.B., 2012, Exploring the patterns of group model development about blood flow in the heart and reasoning process by small group interaction. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32, 805-822. (in Korean)
Leffler, A., Gillespie, D.L., and Conaty, J.C., 1982, The effects of status differentiation on nonverbal behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 153-161.
Lim, H.J. and Noh, T.H., 2001, Verbal interactions in heterogeneous small-group cooperative learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 21, 668-676. (in Korean)
Lim, C.I., Yoon, S.K., and Yeon, E.K., 2007, A study of group size for learners' active online discussions. Journal of Educational Technology, 23, 89-118. (in Korean)
Linn, M.C., and Burbules, N.C., 1993, Construction of Knowledge and Group Learning. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington DC, USA, 91-119.
Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, 2011, Science Curriculum. Notification No. 2011-361 of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, 2 p. (in Korean)
Nam, K.D., An, M.Y., Lee, J.T., Lee, J.H., Choi, H.S., and Hong, K.W., 2008, Group Dynamics. In D. R. Forsyth (Ed.), Group Dynamics 4th Eds. Nelson Education: Canada, Sigmapress, Seoul, Korea, 14 p.
Nye, J.L., 1994, Discussion: The social perceiver as a social being. Small Group Research, 25, 316-322.
Park, H.W. and Leydesdorff, L., 2004, Understanding the KrKwic: A computer program for the analysis of Korean text. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 6, 1377-1388.
Park, J.Y. and Lee K.Y., 2012, The impact of grouping methods on free inquiry implementation: The case of two middle schools adopting different grouping methods. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32, 686-702. (in Korea)
Portner, P. and Partee, B.H., 2002, Formal semantics: The essential readings. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK, 486 p.
Qin, Z., Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R.T., 1995, Cooperative versus competitive efforts and problem solving. Review of Educational Research, 65, 129-143.
Rogers, R., 1984, Do the gifted think and learn differently? Airview of recent research and its implications of instruction. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 17-39.
Sabella, M.S., 1999, Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland: Using the context of physics problem solving to evaluate the coherence of student knowledge. http://www.physics.umd.edu/ (November 3rd 2012).
Sherif, M. and Sherif, C.W., 1956, An outline of social psychology. Harper and Row, New York, USA, 144 p.
Stryker, S. and Burke, P.J., 2000, The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 284-297.
Turner, J.C., 1982, Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 15-40.
Wageman, R., 2001, The meaning of interdependence. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research. Mahwah, New Jersey, USA, 197-217.
You, J.Y. and Noh, T.H., 2012, An analysis of verbal interaction among science-gifted students in inquiry learning based on analogical experimental design strategy emphasizing understanding and checking stages. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32, 671-685. (in Korean)
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.