• 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

다짐밀도 측정장비(Non-nuclear Type)를 사용한 현장 다짐밀도 평가

Evaluation of Field Compaction Density by Non-nuclear Density Gauge


PURPOSES : The objective of this study is to compare the densities of asphalt pavements measured both in the field and in the laboratory, and also to evaluate the applicability of field density measuring equipment, such as the pavement quality indicator (PQI), by using statistical analysis. METHODS : For the statistical analysis of the density measured from asphalt pavement, student t-tests and a coefficient of correlation are investigated. In order to compare the measured densities, two test sections are prepared, with a base layer and an intermediate layer constructed. Each test section consists of 9 smaller sections. During construction, the field densities are measured for both layers (base and intermediate) in each section. Core samples are extracted from similar regions in each section, and moved to the laboratory for density measurements. All the measured densities from both the field and laboratory observations are analyzed using the selected statistical analysis methods. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION : Based on an analysis of measured densities, analysis using a correlation coefficient is found to be more accurate than analysis using a student t-test. The correlation coefficient (R) between the field density and the core density is found to be very low with a confidence interval less than 0.5. This may be the result of inappropriate calibration of the measuring equipment. Additionally, the correlation coefficient for the base layer is higher than for the intermediate layer. Finally, we observe that prior to using the density measuring equipment in the field, a calibration process should be performed to ensure the reliability of measured field densities.

참고문헌 (7)

  1. Allen, D.L and D.B. Schultz (2003). Evaluation of Non-nuclear Density Gauges. Kentucky Transportation Center. 
  2. Hwang, S.D. (2004), Improvement of Asphalt Pavement Construction Technology-Management of Field Compaction. Korean Society of Road Engineers, Special Issue Vol. 6-2, pp. 12-18. 
  3. Harrel, M.J. and W.G. Buttlar (1999), Performance Evaluation of the Pavement Quality Indicator (PQI). Illinois Cooperative Highway Research Program, Project IHR-425. 
  4. Hausman, J.J. and W.G. Buttlar (2000), Report on Laboratory Analysis of Transtech Modle 300 Pavement Quality Indicator. Illinois Cooperative Highway Research Program, Project IHR-425. 
  5. Henault, J.W. (2001), Field Evaluation of a Non-nuclear Density Pavement Quality Indicator. Final Report of Research Project SPR-2227, Connecticut Department of Transportation. 
  6. Romero, P. (2002). Evaluation of Non-nuclear Gauges to Measure Density of Hot-Mix Asphalt Pavements. The University of Utah Department of Civil Environmental Engineering. 
  7. Sargand, S.M. and S. Kim (2005), A Working Review of Available Non-nuclear Equipment for Determining In-place Density of Asphalt. Report No. FHWA/OH-2005/18, Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and Environment. 

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음


원문 PDF 다운로드

  • ScienceON :

원문 URL 링크

원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. (원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기)

상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일