최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.35 no.2, 2015년, pp.333 - 342
This study analyzes the verbal interaction patterns used in a social network activity analysis that appeared in a science inquiry activity of 31 small groups of science-gifted students consisting of 5 members each. The results of this study are as follows: The interaction patterns showed eight types...
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
2009 개정 교육과정은 어디에 초점을 두고있는가? | 2009 개정 교육과정은 과학 개념의 통합적 이해 및 과학 탐구 능력 향상을 목표로 문제 해결에 필요한 정보를 파악하고 소통하여 합리적인 의사 결정을 할 수 있는 창의‧인성을 갖춘 인재 양성에 초점을 두고 있다(Ministry of Education and Science Technology, 2010). 이에 따라 타인과의 의사소통 능력 함양은 물론 자신의 의견을 명확히 표현하고 상대방의 의견을 존중하는 태도를 기를 수 있는 학습자 중심의 소집단 활동이 강조되고 있다(Ministry of Education and Science Technology, 2011). | |
2009 개정 교육과정에서 어떠한 활동이 강조되고있나? | 2009 개정 교육과정은 과학 개념의 통합적 이해 및 과학 탐구 능력 향상을 목표로 문제 해결에 필요한 정보를 파악하고 소통하여 합리적인 의사 결정을 할 수 있는 창의‧인성을 갖춘 인재 양성에 초점을 두고 있다(Ministry of Education and Science Technology, 2010). 이에 따라 타인과의 의사소통 능력 함양은 물론 자신의 의견을 명확히 표현하고 상대방의 의견을 존중하는 태도를 기를 수 있는 학습자 중심의 소집단 활동이 강조되고 있다(Ministry of Education and Science Technology, 2011). | |
과학 탐구 활동이란? | 과학 탐구 활동은 소집단 구성원들 간의 다양한 의견 교환과 협의를 통해 문제를 해결해가는 과정으로 협력적인 상호작용이 전제되는 학습자 중심의 활동이다. 특히, 탐구 실험은 문제를 인식하고 해결하기 위하여 일련의 탐구 과정을 수행하는 동안 소집단 구성원들 간의 활발한 상호작용이 이루어짐으로써 과학 개념의 이해(Park, Nam, & Yoo, 2000), 과학 탐구 능력(Kim et al. |
Bae, J., & Ok, S. (2009). The effects of elementary science lessons emphasizing social interactions on the metacognition, learning motive and academic achievement. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 28(4), 519-527.
Chang, H. (1997). Social network analysis: Historical development, principles and method. Language information, 1, 62-106.
Choi, M., & Jhun, Y. (2010). Discourse analysis for deriving characteristics of science-gifted elementary students in inquiry activities. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 20(1), 369-388.
Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 281-317.
Fox, R. (1995). Teaching through discussion. In C. Desforges (Ed.), An introduction to teaching: Psychological Perspectives(pp. 132-149). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Han, K., Park, H., & Ryu, J. (2011). A case study on the learning characteristics of science-gifted students in jeonnam province -focused on verbal and nonverbal interactions in small group-. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(1), 51-60.
Hogan, K. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 379-432.
Hwang, H., & Kang, J. (2004). The effects of scaffolding instruction by zone of proximal development on motivated learning strategies and academic achievement. 'The Journal of the Korean Society for Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education, 16(1), 35-49.
Jhun, Y., & Hwang, H. (2010). Analysis on student-to-student verbal interaction during small group open inquiry activities. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 21(2), 227-246.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1985). Oral interaction in cooperative learning groups: Speaking, listening, and the nature of statements made by high-medium, and low-achieving students. Journal of Psychology, 119(2), 303-321.
Kang, S., Kim, C., & Noh, T. (2000). Analysis of verbal interaction in small group discussion. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 20(3), 353-363.
Kim, H., & Choi, B. (2009). Development of the instructional model emphasizing discussion and the characteristics of verbal interactions during its implementation in a science high school. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 29(4), 359-372.
Kim, H., Lee, E., & Kang, S. (2006). Analysis of approachs to learning based on student-student verbal interactions according to the type of inquiry experiments using everyday materials. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 26(1), 16-24.
Kim, J., Seong, S., Park, J., & Choi, B. (2002). The effects of scientific inquiry experiments emphasizing social interaction. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(4), 757-767.
Kim, J., Shin, A., Park, K., & Choi, B. (2001). The effects of science inquiry experiments emphasizing social interactions and the analysis of social interactions by cognitive level of the students. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 45(5), 470-480.
Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos. in organizations. In N. Nohrea & R. G. Eccles (eda.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 2160239). Massachusetts: Havard Business School Press.
Lee, H., Chang, S., Seong, S., Lee, S., Kang, S., & Choi, B. (2002). Analysis of student-student interaction in interactive science inquiry experiment. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(3), 660-670.
Ministry of Education and Science Technology (2010). The future of the republic of Korea through creative human resources, advanced science and technology. Activity report in 2011.
Ministry of Education and Science Technology (2011). Science curriculum. Seoul: MEST.
O'Donnel, A. M., & King, A. (1999). Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Park, J., Nam, J., & Yoo, H. (2000). The effects of a teaching strategy based on the interactive formative assessment in middle school science class. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 20(3), 468-478.
Russell, D. (1993). Vygotsky, Dewey, and Externalism: Beyond the student/discourse dichotomy. Journal of advanced Composition, 13(1), 173-197.
Savery, R. E., & Duffy, T. M. (2001). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.
Seong, S. (2005). Change and characteristics of verbal interaction in science inquiry experiments emphasizing social interactions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Korea National University of Education.
Seong, S., & Choi, B. (2007). Change and characteristics of interactions in a heterogeneous group in scientific inquiry experiments. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 27(9), 870-880.
Settlage, J., & Southerland, S. A. (2007). Teaching science to every child: Using culture as a starting point. New York: Routledge.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative Learning: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Sohn, D. (2010). Social network analysis. Seoul: Kyungmoonsa.
Storberg-Waller, J., & Gubbins, C. (2007). Social networks as a conceptual and empirical tool to understand and "Do" HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9(3), 291-311.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Yang, I., Jeong, J., Kim, Y., Kim, M., & Cho, H. (2006). Analyses of the aims of laboratory activity, interaction, and inquiry process within laboratory instruction in secondary school science. The Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 27(5), 509-520.
Yoo, M. (2012). A case study on the science-gifted students' verbal interaction in small group inquiry activity according to grouping method considering MBTI personality type. Journal of Science Education for the Gifted, 4(1), 43-64.
You, J., & Noh, T. (2012). An analysis of verbal interaction among science-gifted students in inquiry learning based on analogical experimental design strategy emphasizing understanding and checking stages. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(4), 671-685.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.