$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

STS 관점에서 본 위험 거버넌스 모델: 위험분석과 사전주의 원칙을 중심으로
Risk Governance Models Seen from the STS Perspectives: Risk Analysis Framework and the Precautionary Principles 원문보기

科學技術學硏究 = Journal of science & technology studies, v.15 no.1, 2015년, pp.281 - 325  

현재환 (서울대학교 과학사 및 과학철학 협동과정) ,  홍성욱 (서울대학교 생명과학부)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

이 글은 시민참여를 주장하는 STS 연구들이 각기 다른 이론적 관심과 방법론에 의해 상이한 입장을 취하게 되었음을 보인 필자들의 선행연구를 심화하여, 이상이한 입장들이 위험 거버넌스의 두 가지 큰 방법론인 위험분석(또는 위험평가/위험관리의 구분)과 사전주의 원칙에 대한 서로의 해석과 평가에 반영됨을 보일것이다. 이를 통해, 이 글은 STS 영역 밖에서 발전한 위험분석(위험평가/위험관리)이나 사전주의 원칙에 대한 STS의 입장이 단일한 것이 아님을 드러내고, 나아가 STS의 시민참여 거버넌스와 위험 거버넌스 연구 사이의 이론적이고 실천적인 접점을 확인하면서 일부 STS 연구자가 제시한 참여적 거버넌스 모델의 문제를 지적할 것이다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

In this paper, we continue our previous study on the differences, similarities and interfaces between the various models of scientific governance discussed in STS and those in risk governance developed by risk studies. In the previous paper we illuminated that theoretical differences among STS schol...

주제어

참고문헌 (73)

  1. 고철환 (2008), 생태적 근대화, 지속가능발전, 그리고 우리나라에서의 함의, 인간.환경.미래 1호, pp. 123-155. 

  2. 김은성 편 (2009), 불확실성에 대응하는 위험 거버넌스, 법문사. 

  3. 유현석 (2006), 글로벌 거버넌스: 개념적 논의, 국정관리연구, 1권 1호, pp. 103-125. 

  4. 해리 콜린스.트레버 핀치 저, 김명진.이정호 역 (2009), 닥터 골렘: 두 얼굴의 현대 의학 어떻게 볼 것인가?, 사이언스북스. 

  5. 하대청 (2010), 사전주의의 원칙은 비과학적인가?: 위험분석과의 논쟁을 통해 본 사전주의 원칙의 합리성, 과학기술학연구 10권 2호, pp. 143-174. 

  6. 현재환.홍성욱 (2012), 시민참여를 통한 과학기술 거버넌스: STS의 '참여적 전환' 내의 다양한 입장에 대한 역사적 인식론, 과학기술학연구 12권 3호, pp. 33-79. 

  7. Aven, T. and O. Renn (2010), Risk Management and Governance: Concepts, Guidelines, and Applications, Springer. 

  8. Blok, A. and T. E. Jensen (2011), Bruno Latour: Hybrid Thoughts in a Hybrid World, Routledge. 

  9. Boutillon, S (2002), "The Precautionary Principle: Development of An International Standard", Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 429, pp. 429-469. 

  10. Brown, P. (1987), "Popular Epidemiology: Community Response to Toxic Waste-Induced Disease in Woburn, Massachusetts", Science, Technology and Human Values, Vol. 12, pp. 78-85. 

  11. Callon, M., P. Lascoumes, and Y. Barthe (2009), Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy, The MIT Press. 

  12. Carson, R. (1962), Silent Spring, Houghton Mifflin. 

  13. Carlisle, R. P. (1997), "Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Nuclear Reactors: Engineering Success, Public Relations Failure", Technology and Culture, Vol. 38, pp. 920-941. 

  14. Collins, H. (2015), "Elective Modernism," (http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/socsi/contactsandpeople/harrycollins/expertise-project/elective%20modernism%204.doc) 2015.5.10. 접속. 

  15. Collins, H. and R. Evans (2002), "The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience", Social Studies of Science, Vol. 32, pp.235-296. 

  16. Collins, H. and R. Evans, (2008), Rethinking Expertise, University of Chicago Press. 

  17. Collins, H., M. Weinel, and R. Evans (2010), "The Politics and Policy of the Third Wave: New Technologies and Society", Critical Policy Studies Vol. 4, pp. 185-201. 

  18. Commoner, B. (1971), The Closing Circle: Nature, Man, and Technology, Random House. 

  19. Cooke, R. (2009), "A Brief History of Quantitative Risk Assessment", Resources, Vol. 172, pp. 8-9. 

  20. de Marchi, B. and J. Ravetz (1999), "Risk Management and Governance: a Post-normal Science Approach", Futures Vol. 31, pp. 743-757. 

  21. de Sadeleer, N. (2000), "The Enforcement of the Precautionary Principle by German, French, and Belgian Courts", Review of European Community and International Environment Law, Vol. 9, pp. 144-151. 

  22. DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions) (2000), Guidelines for Environmental Risk Assessment and Management: Raised Developmental Guidance. 

  23. Douma, W. (2000), "The Precautionary Principle in the Netherlands", in T. O'Riordan, A. Jordan, and J. Cameron eds., Reinterpreting the Precautionary Principle, pp. 163-182, Cameron and May. 

  24. Dratwa, J. (2002), "Taking Risks with the Precautionary Principle: Food (and the Environment) for Thought at the European Commission", Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, Vol. 4, pp. 197-213. 

  25. EEA (European Environment Agency) (2001), Late Lesson from Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle, 1898-2000, European Environment Agency. 

  26. ESRC-GECP (Global Environmental Change Programme) (1999), The Politics of GM Food: Risk, Science and Public Trust, Economic and Social Research Council. 

  27. Evans, R. and A. Flows (2007),"Listening without Prejudice? Re-Discovering the Value of the Disinterested Citizen Author(s)", Social Studies of Science, Vol. 37, pp. 827-853. 

  28. Funtowicz, S. O. and J. R. Ravetz (1992), "Three Types of Risk Assessment and the Emergence of Post-normal Science", in S. Krimsky and D. Golding eds., Social Theories of Risk, pp. 251-274, Praeger. 

  29. Funtowicz, S. O. and R. Strand (2007), "Models of Science and Policy", in T. Traavik, and L.C. Lim eds., Biosafety First: Holistic Approaches to Risk and Uncertainty in Genetic Engineering and Genetically Modified Organisms, pp. 263-278, Tapir Academic Publishers. 

  30. Funtowicz, S., I. Shepherd, D. Wilkinson, and J. Ravetz (2000), "Science and Governance in the European Union: A Contribution to the Debate", Science and Public Policy, Vol. 27, pp. 327-336. 

  31. Hayden, C. (2003), When Nature Goes Public: The Making and Unmaking of Bioprospecting in Mexico, Princeton University Press. 

  32. Hajer, M. A. (1995), The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process, Clarendon Press. 

  33. Hoffman, K. (2013), "Unheeded Science: Taking Precaution out of Toxic Water Pollutants Policy", Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 38, pp. 829-850. 

  34. Hoffmann-Riem, H. and B. Wynne (2002), "In Risk Assessment, One Has to Admit Ignorance", Nature, Vol. 416, p. 123. 

  35. IRCG (2010), Risk Governance: Towards An Integrative Approach, The International Risk Governance Council. 

  36. ISIS (2000), "World Science Statement," (http://www.i-sis.org.uk/list.php) 2015.5.10. 접속. 

  37. Jasanoff, S. (1986), Risk Management and Political Culture: A Comparative Study of Science in the Policy Context, Russell Sage Foundation. 

  38. Jasanoff, S., (1987), "Contested Boundaries in Policy-Relevant Science", Social Studies of Science, Vol. 17, pp. 195-230. 

  39. Jasanoff, S., (1992), "Science, Politics, and the Renegotiation of Expertise at EPA", Osiris, Vol. 7, pp. 194-217. 

  40. Jasanoff, S., (1993), "Bridging the Two Cultures of Risk Analysis", Risk Analysis, Vol. 13, pp. 123-129. 

  41. Jasanoff, S., (1995), "Procedural Choices in Regulatory Science", Technology in Society, Vol. 17, pp. 279-293. 

  42. Jasanoff, S., (1996), Risk, Precaution, and Environmental Values, Carnegie Coucil on Ethics and International Affairs. 

  43. Jasanoff, S., (1998), "The Political Science of Risk Perception", Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 59, pp. 91-99. 

  44. O'Riodan, T., A. Jordan, and J. Cameron (2000), "The Evolution of The Precautionary Principle", in T. O'Riodan, J. Cameron, and A. Jordan eds., Reinterpreting the Precautionary Principle, pp. 9-34, Cameron and May. 

  45. Lammerding, A. (1996), "Microbial Food Safety Risk Assessment: Principles and Practice", Proceedings, Xth International Conference on Food Safety, ASEPT, Laval. 

  46. Latour, B. (1987), Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Harvard University Press. 

  47. Latour, B., (1999), Pandroa's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Harvard University Press. 

  48. Latour, B., (2002), "Morality and Technology: The End of the Means", Theory, Culture, & Society, Vol. 19, pp. 247-260. 

  49. Latour, B., (2004), Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy, Harvard University Press. 

  50. Latour, B., (2007), ""It's Development, Stupid !" or: How to Moderniz e Modernization", (http://www.bruno-latour.fr/node/153) 2015.4.22. 접속. 

  51. Latour, B., (2012), "Love Your Monsters", Breakthrough Journal, Feb 14 

  52. Lujan, J.L. and O. Todt (2012), "Precaution: A Taxonomy", Social Studies of Science, Vol. 42, pp. 143-157. 

  53. Magnus, David (2008), "Risk Management versus the Precautionary Principle: Agnotology as a Strategy in the Debate over Genetically Engineered Organisms", in R. Protcter and L. Schiebinger eds., Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance, pp. 250-265, Stanford University Press. 

  54. Meadows, D. H., D. L. Meadows, and J. Randers (1972), The Limits of Growth, Universe Books. 

  55. National Research Council, (1983), Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process, National Academy Press. 

  56. National Research Council, (1994), Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment, National Academy Press. 

  57. National Research Council, (1996), Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society, National Academy Press. 

  58. Ravetz, J. (2004), "The Post-Normal Science of Precaution", Futures, Vol. 36, pp. 347-357. 

  59. Ravetz, J. (2005), The No-Nonsense Guide to Science, Verso. 

  60. Ravetz, J. (2007), "Post-Normal Science and the Complexity of Transitions Towards Sustainability", Ecological Complexity, Vol. 3, pp. 275-284. 

  61. Renn, O. (2007), "Nanotechnology and Risk Governance: The IRGC Model", (International Workshop, Vienna, Sep 25) 

  62. Renn, O., (2008), Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World, Earthscan. 

  63. Sadin, P. (1999), "Dimensions of the Precautionary Principle", Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, Vol. 5, pp. 889-907. 

  64. Stirling, A. (1999), "Risk a Turning Point?", Journal of Environmental Medicine Vol. 1, pp. 119-126. 

  65. Stirling, A., (2006), "Uncertainty, Precautioned Sustainability: Towards More Reflective Governance of Technology", in J. P. Voss, D. Bauknecht, and R. Kemp eds., Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, pp. 225-272, Edward Elgar. 

  66. Stirling, A., (2007), "Risk, Precaution and Science: Towards a More Constructive Policy Debate", EMBO Reports, Vol. 8, pp. 309-315. 

  67. Stirling, A., (2010), "Keep It Complex", Nature, Vol. 468, pp. 1029-1031. 

  68. Sunstein, C. (2005), Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle, Cambridge University Press. 

  69. Wynne, B. (1992), "Uncertainty and Environmental Learning: Reconceiving Science and Policy in the Preventive Program", Global Environmental Change, Vol. 2, pp. 111-127. 

  70. Wynne, B., (1999), "Bitter Fruits: The Issues of GM Crops is Too Important to Leave to Science Alone, Argues Brian Wynne", The Guardian Sep 16. 

  71. Wynne, B., (2001), "Managing and Communicating Scientific Uncertainty in Public Policy", (Harvard University Conference on Biotechnology and Global Governance: Crisis and Opportunity, Kennedy School of government, Apr 26-28) 

  72. Waterton, C. and B. Wynne (2004), "Knowledge and Political Order in the European Environment Agency", in S. Jasanoff ed., States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order, pp. 87-108, Routledge. 

  73. Weinberg, A. (1972), "Science and Trans-Science", Minerva, Vol. 10, pp. 209-222. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로