$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Potential Economic Impacts of the Vietnam-Korea Free Trade Agreement on Vietnam

Journal of east asian economic integration, v.20 no.1, 2016년, pp.67 - 90  

Phan, Thanh Hoan (College of Economics, Hue University) ,  Jeong, Ji Young (College of Commerce, Chonbuk National University)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This paper provides an assessment of the potential economic impacts of the Vietnam-Korea free trade agreement on Vietnam, by using general equilibrium modeling. The results show that Vietnam-Korea FTA will increase aggregate welfare for both countries in the long run. The most important gains accrue...

주제어

참고문헌 (34)

  1. ADB. 2010. Methods for Ex Ante Economic Evaluation of Free Trade Agreements. (accessed Nov. 21, 2015) 

  2. ADB. 2011. Methodology for Impact Assessment of Free Trade Agreements. (accessed Nov. 21, 2015) 

  3. Adams, P. D., Huff, K. M., McDougall, R., Pearson, R. and A. A. Powell. 1997. "Mediumand Long-Run Consequences for Australia of an APEC Free Trade Area: CGE Analyses Using the GTAP and Monash Models," Asia-Pacific Economic Review, vol. 3, no.1, pp. 19-42. 

  4. Ahmed, S. 2010. India-Korea CEPA: Potentials and Realities. (accessed Nov. 21, 2015) 

  5. Armington, P. 1969. "A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production," IMF Staff Papers, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 159-178. 

  6. ASEAN Secretariat. 2013. Southeast Asia: A Free Trade Area. Official website (accessed Nov. 21, 2015) 

  7. ASEAN-KOREA FTA-Home page: (accessed Nov. 21, 2015) 

  8. Balassa, B. 1965. "Trade Liberalization and 'Revealed' Comparative Advantage," Manche ster School of Economic and Social Studies, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 99-123. 

  9. Baldwin, R. 1992. "Measurable Dynamic Gains from Trade," Journal of Political Economy, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 162-174. 

  10. Baldwin, R. and A. J. Venables. 1995. Regional Economic Integration. In Grossman, G. M. and K. Rogoff (eds.). Handbook of International Economics. Vol. III. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 

  11. Batra, A. 2007. "Asian Economic Integration: ASEAN+3+1 or ASEAN+1s?," ASEAN Economic Bulletin, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 181-204. 

  12. Bchir, M. H. and M. Fouquin. 2006. Economic Integration in Asia: Bilateral Free Trade Agreements Versus Asian Single Market. CEPII Working Paper No. 2006-15. CEPII Research Center. 

  13. Bhagwati, J. 1968. Trade Liberalization Among LDCs, Trade Theory and GATT Rules. In Hicks, J. and J. N. Wolfe (eds.). Value, Capital and Growth: papers in honour of Sir John Hicks. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press. 

  14. Boyer, I. and A. Schuschny. 2010. Quantitative Assessment of a Free Trade Agreement between MERCOSUR and the European Union, CEPAL, Statistics and Economic Projections Div., Natural Resources and Infrastructure Div. 

  15. Cheong, I. 2005. Estimation of Economic Effects of FTAs in East Asia-CGE Approach, In Ahn, C. Y., Baldwin, R., Cheong, I. (eds.), East Asian Economic Regionalism: Feasibilities and Challenges. Netherlands: Springer. 

  16. Cheong, I. 2012. "Korea-Vietnam Bilateral FTA: Issues and Economic Impacts," Journal of International Trade and Industry Studies, vol.17, no.2, pp. 1-23. (in Korean) 

  17. Cororaton, C. 2004. Philippine-Japan Bilateral Agreements: Analysis of Possible Effects on Unemployment, Distribution and Poverty in the Philippines Using CGE Microsimulation Approach. Discussion Paper Series no. 2004-01. Philippines Institute for Development Studies. 

  18. Dimaranan, B., Duc, L. T. and W. Martin. 2005. Potential Economic Impacts of Merchandise Trade Liberalization under Viet Nam's Accession to the WTO, GTAP Resource # 1777, GTAP Resource Centre, Purdue University. 

  19. Francois, J. F. and B. J. McDonald. 1996. Liberalization and Capital Accumulation in the GTAP Model. GTAP Technical Paper No. 7. Purdue University. 

  20. Frankel, J., Stein. E., Wei, S. J. 1995. "Trading Blocs And The Americas: The Natural, The Unnatural, And The Super-Natural," Journal of Development Economics, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 61-95. 

  21. General Statistics Office of Vietnam. 2013. (accessed Nov. 21, 2015) 

  22. Hanslow, K. 2001. A General Welfare Decomposition for CGE Models. GTAP Technical Paper No. 19. Purdue University. 

  23. Hertel, T. W. and M. E. Tsigas. 1997. Structure of GTAP. In Hertel, T. W. (ed.). Global Trade Analysis Modeling and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 13-73. 

  24. Hertel, T., Hummels, D., Ivanic, M. and R. Keeney. 2007. "How Confident Can We Be in CGE-Based Assessments of Free Trade Agreements?," Economic Modelling, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 611-635. 

  25. Huff, K. and T. Hertel. 2001. Decomposing Welfare Changes in the GTAP Model. GTAP Technical Paper No. 5. Purdue University. 

  26. Park, I. 2003. "A CGE Analysis of a Korea-China-Japan Free Trade Area," Economic Papers, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 151-186. 

  27. Kawasaki, K. 2003. The Impact of Free Trade Agreements in Asia. RIETI Discussion Paper Series 03-E-18, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry. 

  28. Korea International Trade Association (KITA) Statistics 2013. (accessed Nov. 21, 2015) 

  29. Siriwardana. M. and J. Yang, 2008, "GTAP Model Analysis of the Economic Effects of an Australia-China FTA: Welfare and Sectoral Aspects," Global Economic Review, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 341-362. 

  30. Malcolm, G. 1998. Adjusting Tax Rates in the GTAP Data Base. GTAP Technical Paper 12, Purdue University. 

  31. MUTRAP. 2010. Impact assessment of ASEAN-Korea FTA on Vietnam Economy. European Trade Policy and Investment Support Project (EU-MUTRAP) Report. 

  32. United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD), 2016. United Nations Commodity Trade Statistics Database. 

  33. Vietnam Chamber of Commerce and Industry (VCCI), 2016, Vietnam-Korea towards Shared Peace and Prosperity. (accessed Jan. 15, 2016) 

  34. WTO. 2012. Chapter 3. Analyzing Bilateral Trade Using the Gravity Equation. A Practical Guide to Trade Policy Analysis. WTO Publication. pp. 103-135. 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트