참고문헌 (29)

1. 고영만, 송인석 (2011). 연구 문헌의 지식구조를 반영하는 의미기반의 지식조직체계에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 28(1), 145-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2011.28.1.145 (Ko, Young-Man, & Song, Inseok (2011). A study on the knowledge organizing system of research papers based on semantic relation of the knowledge structure. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(1), 145-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2011.28.1.145) 

   원문보기 상세보기

2. 박진용 (1997). 텍스트 의미 구조의 과정 중심 분석 방법 연구. 석사학위논문, 한국교원대학교 대학원, 국어교육학과 국어교육전공. (Park, Chin-Yong (1997). A study on the method of process-driven analysis in text structure. Master's Thesis, Graduate School of the Korea National University of Education, Department of Korean Language Education.) 

3. 송민선, 고영만 (2015). 한국학 연구 논문의 의미구조 기반 메타데이터 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 46(3), 277-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.46.3.201509.277 (Song, Min-Sun, & Ko, Young Man (2015). A study on the metadata based on the semantic structure of the Korean studies research articles. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 46(3), 277-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.46.3.201509.277) 

   

4. 유사라, 이혜원, 송인석 (2009). 연구자 중심 연구성과물 의미검색을 위한 인문사회 학술용어 온톨로지 적용 및 유지관리 체계 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 43(2), 277-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2009.43.2.277 (Yoo, Sa-Rah, Lee, Hye-Won, & Song, Inseok (2009). A study on the application and management framework of social science scholarly ontology for semantic information navigation. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 43(2), 277-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2009.43.2.277) 

   원문보기 상세보기

5. 정여훈 (2013). 수사구조이론과 한국어 텍스트 분석의 실제. 언어사실과 관점, 32, 261-288. (Jeong, Yeo Hoon (2013). Rhetorical structure theory and the practice of Korean text analysis. Language Facts and Perspective, 32, 261-288.) 

6. Beissel-Durrant, G. (2004). A typology of research methods within the social sciences. NCRM (National Centre for Research Methods) working paper, NCRM. 

7. Bouayad-Agha, N., Power, R., & Scott, D. (2000). Can text structure be incompatible with rhetorical structure? Proceedings of the First International Conference on Natural Language Generation. 12-16 Jun 2000, Mitzpe Ramon, Israel. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/1118253.1118280 

   

8. Brewer, W. F. (1980). Literary theory, rhetoric, and stylistics: Implications for psychology. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 

9. Brinker, K. (1985). Linguistische textanalyse. Berlin: Erich Schmitdt Verlag. 

10. Buckingham Shum, S., Motta, S. E., & Dominique, J. (2000). Scholonto: Ontology-based digital library server for research document and discourse. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 3, 237-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s007990000034 

    상세보기

11. de Beaugrande, R., & Dressler, W. U. (1981). Einfuhrung in die textlinguistik. Tubingen: Niemeyer. 

12. Frederiksen, C. H. (1975). Representing logical and semantic structure of knowledge acquired from discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 7(3), 371-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90016-x 

    상세보기

13. Halladay, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohension in English. London: Longman. 

14. Harmsze, F. A. P. (2000). A modular structure for scientific articles in an electronic environment. Ph.D. Dissertation, Van der Waals-Zeeman Institute, University of Amsterdam. 

15. Heflin, J., Hendler, J., & Luke, S. (1998). Reading between the lines: Using SHOE to discover implicit knowledge from the web. AAAI-98 Workshop on AI and Information Integration (Vol. 297). 

16. Kampa, S. R. (2002). Who are the expert? e-scholars in the semantic web. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Southampton. 

17. Kando, N. (1997). Text-level structure of research papers: Implications for text-based information processing systems. Proceedings of the 19th Annual BCS-IRSG Colloquium on IR Research, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK, 68-81. 

18. Kando, N. (1999). Text structure analysis as a tool to make retrieved documents sable. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Information Retrieval with Asian Languages. 126-135. 

19. Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Oxford, England: Lawrence Erlbaum. 

20. Luke, S., Spector, L., & Rager, D. (1996). Ontology-based knowledge discovery on the worldwide web. Working Notes of the Workshop on Internet-Based Information Systems at the 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI96), 96-102. 

21. Meyer, B. J. F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam; North-Holland Publishing Co. 

22. Ono, K., Sumita, K., & Miike, S. (1994). Abstract generation based on rhetorical structure extraction. Proceedings of the 15th conference on Computational linguistics, 1, 344-348. 

23. Shotton, D. (2009). Cito, the citation typing ontology. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 1(Suppl 1), S6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-1-s1-s6 

    상세보기

24. Sibun, P. (1993). Domain structure, rhetorical structure, and text structure. Proceedings of the Workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations on the 31st ACL. Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio, USA. 

25. Superceanu R. (1998). The rhetoric of scientific articles: A genre study. Timisoara, Rumania: Orizonturi Universitare. 

26. van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum. 

27. Vater, H. (1994). Einfuhrung in die textlinguistik. Munchen: Wilhelm Fink Verlag. 

28. Weigand, E. (2009). Language as dialogue: From rules to principles of probability. (Ed. Feller, S.), Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 

29. Werlich, E. (1976). A text grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle und Meyer. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

송민선 (8) 고영만 (43) 이승준 (3)