$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

4차 산업혁명에 따른 미래사회와 교육환경의 변화, 그리고 초·중등 과학교육의 과제
The Changes of Future Society and Educational Environment according to the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Tasks of School Science Education 원문보기

초등과학교육 = Journal of Korean elementary science education, v.36 no.3, 2017년, pp.286 - 301  

조헌국 (단국대학교)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Nowadays, the public as well as science educators pays much attention to the fourth industrial revolution and wonders what will happen to the societies in the future. Thus, this study aimed at predicting the education environment which will be brought from the fourth industrial revolution, and sugge...

주제어

질의응답

핵심어 질문 논문에서 추출한 답변
4차 산업혁명과 이로 인해 나타나게 될 미래사회의 모습을 예측해보면 어떠한가? 세계적으로 주목받는 미래학자들의 발표와 세계경제포럼, UNESCO, OECD 등 관련 주요 미래비전 보고서 등을 종합하여 미래 사회의 변화를 직업 생태계의 변화, 소유 중심에서 공유 중심 체제로의 전환, 탈도시화와 분산화, 인간성 상실의 위기 도래로 범주화할 수 있다. 또한 직업 생태계의 변화로 인해 미래사회에 필요한 핵심역량이 강조되고, 교실 현장에서 다루게 될 교육과정과 내용에 변화가 나타나게 되고, 공유 중심 체제로의 전환을 통해 교육에서도 플랫폼을 통한 교육 콘텐츠의 확대와 경쟁이 심화될 것으로 예상된다. 그리고 탈도시화 및 분산화가 가속화되면 인공지능을 활용한 개별화된 맞춤형 교육이 가능해지고, 교수학습 환경과의 상호작용을 강조하는 분산인지 개념이 중요하게 등장할 것으로 예상된다.
4차 산업혁명란 무엇인가? 2차 산업혁명은 1870년 전기를 활용한 대량 생산으로 제조업이 확대된 것을, 3차 산업혁명은 1969년 컴퓨터를 활용한 정보화, 자동화 생산 시스템의 기틀이 마련된 것을 의미한다(Han, 2016). 4차 산업혁명은 인공지능, 로봇, 가상현실, 빅데이터 등 첨단과학기술을 통해 실재와 가상을 결합함으로써 사물과 환경을 지능적으로 제어하는 가상 물리 시스템의 출현을 의미한다(Kim et al., 2016).
인공지능의 발달이 사회 환경에 어떤 변화를 불러오는가? 21세기에 들어서면서 주목받고 있는 4차 산업혁명은 정보통신기술(ICT)과 제조업, 생명과학기술(BT) 등 다양한 과학기술 분야의 총체적 변화를 통해 나타나는 거대한 사회의 변화이다. 인공지능을 활용한 게임 로봇 외에도 자율주행 자동차, 의료 서비스와 교육 등 다양한 분야에 활용될 수 있을 뿐만 아니라, 기존에 인간이 차지하고 있던 많은 직업들을 대체하면서 미래 일자리와 사회 환경에 큰 변화를 가져올 것으로 예상된다. 또한 전통적으로 인류가 가지고 있던 많은 개념들도 도전받고 있다.
질의응답 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (63)

  1. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (ACARA). (2013). The Australian curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au 

  2. Bauer, M. W., Allum, N. & Miller, S. (2007). What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science, 16(1), 79-95. 

  3. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Thousand Oaks. 

  4. Bernstein, J.(2008). Crunch - why do I feel so squeezed? San Franciso, CA: Barrett-Koehler Publishers. 

  5. Beweja, B., Donovan, P., Haefele, M., Siddiqi, L. & Smiles, S. (2016). Extreme automation and connectivity: The global, regional, and investment implications of the fourth industrial revolution. Zurich, Switzerland: Union Bank of Switzerland. 

  6. Boston Consulting Group. (2015). Takeoff in robotics will power the next productivity surge in manufacturing. Retrieved Feb. 15, 2017 from http://www.bcg.com/enza/d/press/10feb2015-robotics-power-productivity-surge-manufacturing-838 

  7. Cha, D. & Kim, S. (2016). Job killer: the fourth industrial revolution: the future of employment after the grand change due to the robot and artificial intelligence [잡킬러: 4차 산업혁명, 로봇과 인공지능이 바꾸는 일자리의 미래]. Seoul: Hans Media. 

  8. Chae, H.-I. & Noh, S.-G. (2015). The research trends in core competency education in Finland: with special emphasis on the analysis of elementary science education. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 19(3), 645-667. 

  9. Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S. & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670-697. 

  10. Chun, B.-H., Park, K. & Chun, M. (2008). An analysis of the attitude toward science, achievements motivation, and the peer relationship, and parents' attitudes to science gifted education. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 18(3), 443-464. 

  11. Chun, S., Go, H., Lee, Y., Kwak, Y., Choi, S., Kang, H. & Park, M. (2017). Development for "science for all Koreans. Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity. 

  12. Class Central. (2017). MOOC course report: August 2017. Retrieved from https://www.class-central.com/report/mooccourse-report-august-2017/ 

  13. DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press. 

  14. Doh, Y., Kim, I., Kim, J., Park, C. & Kang, B. (2013). The concept and application of the artificial intelligence [인공지능: 개념 및 응용]. Paju: Cytech Media. 

  15. Facer, K. (2009). Educational, social and technological futures: A report from the Beyond Current Horizons Programme. 

  16. Finnish National Board of Education. (FNBE). (1999). Framework for evaluating educational outcomes in Finland. Helsinki: FNBE. 

  17. Frey, C. B. & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 114, 254-280. 

  18. Glenn, J. C., Gordon, T. J. and Florescu, F.(2014). The state of the future. Washington, D.C.: The Millennium Project. 

  19. Han, D. (2016). University education and contents in the fourth industrial revolution. Humanities Contents, 42, 9-24. 

  20. Hutchins, E. (1995a). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 

  21. Hutchins, E. (1995b). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, 265-288. 

  22. Im, J.-W., Kim, S.-H., Cho, Y.-J. & Park, K.-S. (2008). The development of the virtual reality system for augmenting scientific inquiry learning environments. The KIPS Transactions : Part B, 15(2), 95-102. 

  23. Institute for Management Development (IMD). (2016). IMD world talent report 2016. Lausanne, Switzerland: IMD. 

  24. Jeong, Y.-S. (2006). An inquiry on the directions and tasks for future-oriented teacher preparation. The Journal of Teacher Education, 23(1), 331-348. 

  25. Jho, H. (2017). The changes of higher education and the tasks of general education according to the fourth industrial revolution. Korean Journal of General Education, 11(2), 53-89. 

  26. Jho, H., Hong, O. & Song, J. (2016). An analysis of STEM/STEAM teacher education in Korea with a case study of two schools from a community of practice perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7), 1843-1862. 

  27. Joo, Y.-G., Chung, Y.-L. & Pyo, J.-Y. (2011). The effectiveness of creative problem solving (CPS) learning on student science interest, science process skills, and science achievement. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 15(3), 657-667. 

  28. Jung, J.-G. (2017). The virtual reality and education in the era of artificial intelligence. Journal of East Asian Social Thoughts, 20(1), 191-217. 

  29. Kim, D., Han, K. & Chang, D. (2016). A milestone study for core competences of science and future human resources in 2045. Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity. 

  30. Kim, H. (2006). Elementary science education through e-learning [e-learning을 활용한 초등 과학교육]. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 22(1), 58-67. 

  31. Kim, H., Kang, N., Kim, M., Maeng, S., Park, J., Baek, Y., Son, J., Shim, K., Oh, P., Lee, K., Lee, B., Jeong, E. & Han, I. (2017). A basic investigation for the development of science education standards for the future generation. Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity. 

  32. Kim, J., Park, B., Noh, Y. & Im, S. (2016). 2016 Davos report: the fourth industrial revolution starting with the artificial intelligence [2016 다보스 리포트: 인공지능발 4차 산업혁명]. Seoul: Maegyeong Publication. 

  33. Kim, K. & Hong, Y.-S. (2015). Relationships among the science learning motivation and academic stress and stress coping styles of the elementary students with low science achievement. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 34(4), 447-457. 

  34. Kim, K.-S., Lee, S.-Y., Jun, W.-C., Kim, H.-S., Kwak, H.-S., Kim, J.-H. & Seo, J.-H. (2011). Measuring ICT Literacy of primary and junior high school students in South Korea. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 22(3), 195-211. 

  35. Konrath, S. H., O'Brien, E. H. & Hsing, C. (2011). Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time - a meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 180-198. 

  36. Korea Employment Information Service. (KEIS). (2017). The prediction of jobs in Korea, 2017. [2017 한국직업 전망]. Seoul: KEIS. 

  37. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity. (KOFAC). (2015). A comprehensive plan of science education for 2016-2020. Seoul: KOFAC. 

  38. Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near - when humans transcend biology. New York: Viking. 

  39. Kwak, Y. (2015). An exploration of teacher professionalism required for changes in future schooling and curriculum reconstruction. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 19(1), 93-111. 

  40. Latour, B. (2005). Resembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 

  41. MacBeath, J. (2012). Learning in and out of school. New York: Routledge. 

  42. Ministry of Education. (2015). The 2015 revised Korean national science curriculum. No. 2015-74. Sejong: Ministry of Education in Korea. 

  43. Monbiot, G. (2017, February 15). In an age of robots, schools are teaching children to be redundant. The guardian. Retrieved https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/15/robots-schools-teaching-children-redundant-testing-learn-future 

  44. Na, J. & Jang, B. (2017). The perspectives of pre-service elementary teachers on science education of future. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 36(1), 85-94. 

  45. New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media Limited. 

  46. Noh, H.-J. & Paik, S.-H. (2014). STEAM-experienced teachers' perception of STEAM in secondary education. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(10), 375-402. 

  47. Park, S., Chung, W. & Park, Y. (2016). Analysis on the utilization of history of science and STEAM and elementary school teachers' perceptions about design-based STEAM instruction applying the history of science in science class. Journal of Science Education, 40(2), 166-188. 

  48. Park, S.-K. (2006). The effects of the group reward and cooperative skill training on the science achievement and learning motivation of elementary students. The Journal of The Korean Earth Science Society, 27(2), 121-129. 

  49. Park, Y-S. & Cho, M. (2017). Posthuman education for future society: using Delphi technique. Art Education Researh Review, 31(2), 179-216. 

  50. Ryoo, J. S. (2016). Which should be the aim of future education between knowledge and character? The Korean Journal of Philosophy of Education, 38(3), 49-68. 

  51. Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum. 

  52. Shin, D., Kim, J., Kim, R., Lee, J., Lee, H. & Lee, J. (2012). Development of interdisciplinary teacher education programs. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 16(1), 371-398. 

  53. Shin, H.-S. & Jung, Y.-J. (2017). The 4th industrial revolution and future of educational administration. Journal of Research in Education, 30(2), 103-147. 

  54. Shin Y.-J. & Han, S.-K. (2011). A study of the elementary school teachers' perception in STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, mathematics) education. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(4), 514-523. 

  55. Song, J. (1999). Between the beginning of the 19th century and the middle of the 20th century: The process of the quickening and development of science-technologysociety education in the United Kingdom (I). Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 19(3), 409-427. 

  56. STEPI Center for Strategic Foresight. (2016). Will the future get better? [미래는 더 나아질 것인가]. Seoul: RHKorea. 

  57. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (UNESCO). (2005). Definition and selection of competencies - Executive summary. Retrieved Feb 27, 2017 from http://deseco.ch/bfs/deseco/en/index/02.parsys.43469.downloadList.2296.DownloadFile.tmp/2005.dskcexecutivesummary.en.pdf 

  58. UNESCO. (2015). Education 2030: towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all. Retrieved Feb 3, 2017 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002331/233137E.pdf 

  59. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 

  60. Westlake, S. (2014). Our work here is done - visions of a robot economy. London, U.K.: National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (NESTA). 

  61. World Economic Forum. (2016a). New vision for education: Fostering social and emotional learning through technology. Retrieved May 10, 2017 from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_New_Vision_for_Education.pdf 

  62. World Economic Forum. (2016b). The fourth industrial revolution: what it means, how to respond. Retrieved Mar 3, 2017 from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond 

  63. Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로