최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기大韓造船學會 論文集 = Journal of the society of naval architects of korea, v.55 no.3, 2018년, pp.274 - 280
이장현 (인하대학교 조선해양공학과) , 최원준 (대한민국, 합동참모본부)
This paper deals with the calculation of vulnerable areas of critical components required for the assessment of naval ship's vulnerability. Taking into account the effectiveness of threatening weapons, the probability density function of damage was used to assess vulnerable areas or vulnerabilities ...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
함정의 생존성의 정의는 무엇인가 | 함정의 생존성은 피격성, 취약성, 회복성의 합으로 정의된다. 취약성은 피격 후 주어진 위협환경에 따른 함정의 손상 정도를 의미하며 (Kim et al. | |
취약 면적 기반의 취약성 평가방법은 무엇을 이용하는가 | 여기서, \(P_{K/H}\)는 피격조건에서 전손(Kill)확률 값을 의미한다. 취약 면적 기반의 취약성 평가방법은 주요 구성품의 취약 면적 또는 취약 확률 값을 이용한다. 함정 취약성 평가 절차는 Ball ( 1985), Kim et al. | |
함정의 생존성 중 취약성은 무엇을 의미하는가 | 함정의 생존성은 피격성, 취약성, 회복성의 합으로 정의된다. 취약성은 피격 후 주어진 위협환경에 따른 함정의 손상 정도를 의미하며 (Kim et al., 2011), Ball (1985; 2003)이 제시한 취약 면적 기반의 항공기 생존성 평가 방법에서 취약성 평가의 이론적 근거를 찾을 수 있다 (Pei et al. |
Akesson, B.M., Lappi, E., Pettersson, V.H., Malmi, E., Syrjanen, S., Vulli, M., & Stenius, K., 2013. Validating indirect fire models with field experiments. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, 10(4), pp.425-434.
Ball, R.E., 1985. The fundamentals of aircraft combat survivability analysis and design. 1st Edition. AIAA Education Series: Monterey, California.
Ball, R.E., 2003. The fundamentals of aircraft combat survivability analysis and design. 2nd Edition. AIAA Education Series: Monterey, California.
Ball, R.E. & Calvano, C.N., 1994. Establishing the fundamentals of a surface ship survivability design discipline. Naval Engineers Journal, 106(1), pp.71-74.
Bloom, J.B., Reese, R.M. & Hopkins, T.M., 1994. Live fire test and evaluation for ships. Naval Engineers Journal, 106(3), pp.228-245.
Choi, Y.H., Lee, K.T., Pyun, J.J., Jang, Y.C., 2017. A study on Pk(Probability of Kill) calculation method of the direct fire weapon system using simulation. Journal of the Korea Society for Simulation, 26(3), pp.115-123.
Chung, J.H. & Kwon, J.I., 2008. Survivability analysis of a naval ship using the MOTISS program(I): theoretical background. Proceedings of the Annual Autumn Meeting of Society of Naval Architects of Korea, Changwon, Republic of Korea, pp.13-15 November 2008.
Chusilp, P., Charubhun, W., & Koanantachai, P., 2014. Monte carlo simulations of weapon effectiveness using Pk matrix and carleton damage function. International Journal of Applied Physics and Mathematics, 4(4), pp.280-285.
Driels, M., 2013. Weaponeering: conventional weapon system effectiveness. Reston, Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Driels, M. R., & Shin, Y. S., 2004. Determining the number of iterations for Monte Carlo simulations of weapon effectiveness. Naval Postgraduate School: Monterey, California.
Fielding, J.P. & Nilubol, O., 2004. Integration of survivability assessment into combat aircraft design for operational effectiveness. Proceedings of the 24th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan, 29 August - 3 September 2004, pp.1-10.
JTCG/ME(Joint Technical Coordinating Group for Munitions Effectiveness), 2001. Survivability models and simulations. Aerospace systems survivability handbook series-Volume 5. JTCG/AS-01-D007.
Kim, K.S., Lee, J.H. & Hwang, S.Y., 2011. Simplified vulnerability assessment procedure for the warship based on the vulnerable area approach. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 85(5), pp.404-413.
Kim, K.S., Lee, J.H., Son, G.J. & Jhun, J.I., 2012. A study of the procedure for integrated survivability assessment. Proceedings of the Society of CAD/CAM Engineers Conference, Pyeongchang, Republic of Korea, 1-3 February 2012. pp.824-840.
Lillis, J.A., 2002. Analysis of the applicability of aircraft vulnerability assessment and reduction techniques to small surface craft. Naval Postgraduate School: Monterey, California.
Lucas, T.W., 2003. Damage functions and estimates of fratricide and collateral damage. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 50(4), pp.306-321.
Lynch, D.D., Kunkel, R.W. & Juarascio, S.S., 1997. An analysis comparison using the Vulnerability Analysis for Surface Target(VAST) Computer Code and the Computation of Vulnerable Area and Repair Time (COVARTIII) Computer Code(No. ARL-MR-341). Army Research Laboratory Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, Maryland.
Otsin, N., 2005. Development of a combat aircraft operation and cost-effectiveness design methodology. Ph.D. Thesis. Granfield College of Aeronautics, Granfield University.
Pei, Y., Song, B. & Han, Q., 2007. Method for assessing vulnerability of aircraft to spray fragments of missile. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 27(2), pp.161-166.
Pei, Y., Song, B., Han, Q. & Ou, B., 2006. Aircraft vulnerable-area decomposition method in the overlapping region of components. Journal of Aircraft. 43(4), pp.1138-1144.
Pei, Y., Song, B., Han, Q. & Ou, B., 2009. A direct simulation method for calculating multiple-hit vulnerability of aircraft with overlapping components. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 22(6), pp.612-619.
Shin, Y.H., Kwon, J.I., Chung, J.H. & Sajdak, A.W., 2012. Development of vulnerability analysis program for review of warship survivability at concept design stage. The 4th International Conference on Design and Analysis of Protective Structures, Jeju, Republic of Korea, 19-22 June 2012, pp.151-162
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.