수치표고모델(DEM, Digital Elevation Model)은 지형공간 영역의 기본 데이터로서, 다양한 데이터로부터 다양한 방법으로 만들어진다. 수치표고모델이 파생됨에 따라, 적용 분야에서의 그 정밀도 또한 다양하게 변화한다. 본 연구에서는, 대한민국 경상남도 연안의 섬 주변에서 광범위하게 사용되는 있는 두 가지 DEM, 즉 육역관측기술위성 월드 3D 30m(ALOS World 3D 30m) 및 셔틀레이더지형미션 글로벌 30m(SRTM Global 30m)를 비교하였다. 우선 DEM의 첫 번째 통계를 계산한 다음, 해발표고 0을 기준으로 높고 낮은 지역을 시각적으로 비교하기 위하여 Landsat 이미지에 중첩하였다. 연구 결과, DEM은 서로 높은 상관관계가 있으며, 유사한 통계를 가지고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 그리고 구릉지에서는 높은 차이가 거의 없었을 뿐만 아니라, 해안선을 나타낼 수 있었다. 또한 DEM은 많은 음의 값을 가지고 있다는 점이 확인되었으며, 싱크를 채운 후에도 표고가음으로 측정되는 것을 방지하기 위해, 해안 지역 전체를 포함하는 연구 지역을 신중하게 선택해야 할 것으로 보인다.
수치표고모델(DEM, Digital Elevation Model)은 지형공간 영역의 기본 데이터로서, 다양한 데이터로부터 다양한 방법으로 만들어진다. 수치표고모델이 파생됨에 따라, 적용 분야에서의 그 정밀도 또한 다양하게 변화한다. 본 연구에서는, 대한민국 경상남도 연안의 섬 주변에서 광범위하게 사용되는 있는 두 가지 DEM, 즉 육역관측기술위성 월드 3D 30m(ALOS World 3D 30m) 및 셔틀레이더지형미션 글로벌 30m(SRTM Global 30m)를 비교하였다. 우선 DEM의 첫 번째 통계를 계산한 다음, 해발표고 0을 기준으로 높고 낮은 지역을 시각적으로 비교하기 위하여 Landsat 이미지에 중첩하였다. 연구 결과, DEM은 서로 높은 상관관계가 있으며, 유사한 통계를 가지고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 그리고 구릉지에서는 높은 차이가 거의 없었을 뿐만 아니라, 해안선을 나타낼 수 있었다. 또한 DEM은 많은 음의 값을 가지고 있다는 점이 확인되었으며, 싱크를 채운 후에도 표고가음으로 측정되는 것을 방지하기 위해, 해안 지역 전체를 포함하는 연구 지역을 신중하게 선택해야 할 것으로 보인다.
DEM(Digital Elevation Model) being fundamental data in geospatial domain is produced from different data and using various methods. As they are derived their precision varies and altering derivative in application. In this work, we compare two widely used DEMs namely(Advanced Land Observing Satellit...
DEM(Digital Elevation Model) being fundamental data in geospatial domain is produced from different data and using various methods. As they are derived their precision varies and altering derivative in application. In this work, we compare two widely used DEMs namely(Advanced Land Observing Satellite World 3D 30m and Shuttle Radar Topography Mission Global 30m) around coastal islands in Gyeongsangnam-do, South Korea. First statistics of each DEM were calculated and later overlapped in Landsat image for visual comparison of areas below and above zero-meter elevation. As a result, it was found that DEMs were highly correlated with each other and had similar statistics. Besides having few high differences in hilly land area, they were able to represent the coastal lines. It has also been noted that they have many negative values and should carefully select study area covering full watershed in coastal regions to avoid negative elevation even after filling the sinks.
DEM(Digital Elevation Model) being fundamental data in geospatial domain is produced from different data and using various methods. As they are derived their precision varies and altering derivative in application. In this work, we compare two widely used DEMs namely(Advanced Land Observing Satellite World 3D 30m and Shuttle Radar Topography Mission Global 30m) around coastal islands in Gyeongsangnam-do, South Korea. First statistics of each DEM were calculated and later overlapped in Landsat image for visual comparison of areas below and above zero-meter elevation. As a result, it was found that DEMs were highly correlated with each other and had similar statistics. Besides having few high differences in hilly land area, they were able to represent the coastal lines. It has also been noted that they have many negative values and should carefully select study area covering full watershed in coastal regions to avoid negative elevation even after filling the sinks.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
문제 정의
In this work, we aimed to work on the application of DEM in coastal areas where there are many islands. We focus on the comparison of two well-known satellite derived DEMs: AW3D30(Advanced Land Observing Satellite World 3D 30m)(Tadono et al.
제안 방법
In this study, comparative analysis of two widely used satellite derived DEMs was performed based on statistics and overlapping to Landsat image. It has been found that both DEMs have negative elevation and were highly correlated to each other.
And for the coastal and islands, areal coverage of below and above zero elevation was calculated. The comparison was done based on overlaying two coastal boundaries and their aerial coverage. The statistical calculations were derived using R package whereas all spatial analysis and graphics were produced in ArcGIS.
대상 데이터
0 product is void-filled using elevation data from other sources. Its coverage includes Africa, Europe, North America, South America, Asia, and Australia. Both data were resampled at a resolution of 30 meters for uniformity in WGS 1984 coordinate system.
The study area selected to compare the two DEMs is from Gyeongsangnam-do, South Korea. A total area of 3443.
후속연구
Although, this study shows how the DEM can be compared and understand the difference. It is recommended that for further work, to use national DEM or LiDAR DEM to compare and verify the accuracy of global DEMs. Furthermore, investigation of watershed and hydrological applications would also help to evaluate the DEMs.
참고문헌 (17)
Acharya, T.D., I.T. Yang and D.H. Lee. 2017(a). GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping of Bhotang, Nepal using frequency ratio and statistical index methods. Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography 35(5):357-364.
Acharya, T.D., I.T. Yang and D.H. Lee. 2017(b). GIS-based preliminary feasibility study for the optimal route selection for China-India railway through Nepal. Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography 35(4):281-289.
Acharya, T.D., I.T. Yang and D.H. Lee. 2018. Comparative analysis of digital elevation models between AW3D30, SRTM30 and airborne LiDAR. Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography 36(1):17-24.
Acharya, T.D., I.T. Yang and D.H. Lee. 2016. Surface water area delineation in Landsat OLI Image using reflectance and SRTM DEM derivatives. 2016 Conference on Geo-Spatial Information, The Korean Society for Geospatial Information Science, Gunsan, pp. 233-234.
Dawod, G. and K. Al-Ghamdi. 2017. Reliability of recent global digital elevation models for geomatics applications in Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Journal of Geographic Information System 9(6):685-698.
Farr, T.G., P.A. Rosen, E. Caro, R. Crippen, R. Duren, S. Hensley, M. Kobrick, M. Paller, E. Rodriguez, L. Roth, D. Seal, S. Shaffer, J. Shimada, J. Umland, M. Werner, M. Oskin, D. Burbank and D. Alsdorf. 2007. The shuttle radar topography mission. Rev. Geophys 45(2):1-33.
Goulden, T., C. Hopkinson, R. Jamieson and S. Sterling. 2016. Sensitivity of DEM, slope, aspect and watershed attributes to LiDAR measurement uncertainty. Remote Sensing of Environment 179:23-35.
Gyasi-Agyei, Y., G. Willgoose and F.P. De Troch. 1995. Effects of vertical resolution and map scale of digital elevation models on geomorphological parameters used in hydrology. Hydrol. Process 9(3-4):363-382.
Hong, H., J. Liu, D.T. Bui, B. Pradhan, T.D. Acharya, B.T. Pham, A. Zhu, W. Chen and B.B. Ahmad. 2018. Landslide susceptibility mapping using J48 Decision Tree with AdaBoost, Bagging and Rotation Forest ensembles in the Guangchang area (China). Catena 163:399-413.
Krishnan, S., C. Crosby, V. Nandigam, M. Phan, C. Cowart, C. Baru and R. Arrowsmith. 2011. OpenTopography: a services oriented architecture for community access to LIDAR topography. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computing for Geospatial Research & Applications, ACM, Washington DC, USA, 7p.
Lee, D.H. and T.D. Acharya. 2017. Comparison of complete bouguer anomalies from satellite marine gravity models with shipbome gravity data in East Sea, Korea. J. Mar. Sci. Technol 25(6):625-632.
Oksanen, J. and T. Sarjakoski. 2005. Error propagation of DEM-based surface derivatives. Computers & Geosciences 31(8):1015-1027.
Schumann, G., P. Matgen, M.E.J. Cutler, A. Black, L. Hoffmann and L. Pfister. 2008. Comparison of remotely sensed water stages from LiDAR, topographic contours and SRTM. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 63(3):283-296.
Tadono, T., H. Ishida, F. Oda, S. Naito, K. Minakawa and H. Iwamoto. 2014. Precise global DEM generation by ALOS PRISM. ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, 2(4):71-76.
Takaku, J. and T. Tadono. 2017. Quality updates of'AW3D'global DSM generated from ALOS PRISM pp. 5666-5669.
Yang, I.T., T.D. Acharya and D.H Lee. 2016. Landslide susceptibility mapping for 2015 earthquake region of Sindhupalchowk, Nepal using Frequency Ratio. Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography, 34(4):443-451.
Yang, I.T., T.D. Acharya and M.S. Shin. 2014. Cycling: An efficient solution to rising transportation problems in Kathmandu. Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography, 32(6):617-623.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.