$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Inclusion of Cephalotaxus in Taxaceae: Evidence from morphology and anatomy 원문보기

식물분류학회지 = Korean journal of plant taxonomy, v.48 no.2, 2018년, pp.109 - 114  

GHIMIRE, Balkrishna (Plant Conservation Division, Korea National Arboretum) ,  JEONG, Mi-Jin (Plant Conservation Division, Korea National Arboretum) ,  LEE, Chunghee (Gardens and Education Division, Korea National Arboretum) ,  HEO, Kweon (Department of Applied Plant Sciences, Kangwon National University)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The inconsistent relationship between the monogeneric family Cephalotaxaceae and Taxaceae was discussed and the possibility of merging Cephalotaxus within Taxaceae was also reviewed. Our previous reports (cladistics analysis, leaf anatomy and wood anatomy of Taxaceae s.l.) did not find a feasible re...

주제어

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper 아이콘 AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

성능/효과

  • Leaf anatomical structures of six genera were very similar each other in tissue type and their arrangements. Taxus, Austrotaxus, and Pseudotaxus were without foliar resin canal, whereas Amentotaxus, Cephalotaxus, and Torreya had single foliar resin canal situated below the vascular bundle. Among the six genera, Torreya was unique with thick walled almost rounded sclerenchymatous epidermal cells.
  • The result of leaf anatomy suggested that Cephalotaxus in one hand resembles with Torreya-Amentotaxus by having resin canal and on the other hand it shares parenchymatous epidermis and similar palisade layers with Taxus-Pseudotaxus. This result is somehow similar with the previous studies in which the genus has generally resolved as either sister to Torreya-Amentotaxus clade or sometimes allied with Taxus clade (Kershaw et al.
  • The Taxus and Torreya resembled each other as the wood of both genera lack axial parenchyma. This indicated that only limited variation in wood features was observed in the five genera of Taxaceae s.l.; in fact, the explanation could be same for six genera because most of the wood features of the monotypic genus Pseudotaxus closely resemble taxad genera, particularly Taxus.
  • This paper discussed whether it is still reasonable to classified Cephalotaxus under monotypic family Cephalotaxaceae or it’s better to merge within close relative Taxaceae.

후속연구

  • (2014) found that Cephalotaxus is strongly supported to be sister to Taxaceae based on either LFY or LFY + NLY CDS, but is weekly nested within Taxaceae based on NLY. Based on this fact they realized that such unpredictable relationship of Cephalotaxus with Taxaceae in the different analysis could be instigated by long branch attraction artifacts or inadequate resolution of markers and thus still some additional studies are needed to resolve the relationship between these two groups.
본문요약 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Anderson, E. D. and J. N. Owens. 2003. Analyzing the reproductive biology of Taxus: should it be included in Coniferales? Acta Horticulturae 615: 233-234. 

  2. Chaw, S.-M., H.-M. Sung, H. Long, A. Zharkikh and W.-H. Li. 1995. The phylogenetic position of the conifer genera Amentotaxus, Phyllocladus, and Nageia inferred from 18S rRNA sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 41: 224-230. 

  3. Chaw, S. M., A. Zharkikh, H. M. Sung, T. C. Lau and W. H. Li. 1997. Molecular phylogeny of extant gymnosperms and seed plant evolution: analysis of nuclear 18S rRNA sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 56-68. 

  4. Cheng, Y., R. G. Nicolson, K. Tripp and S.-M. Chaw. 2000. Phylogeny of Taxaceae and Cephalotaxaceae genera inferred from chloroplast matK gene and nuclear rDNA ITS region. Molecular Phylogenetic and Evolution 14: 353-365. 

  5. Christenhusz, M. J. M., J. L. Reveal, A. Farjon, M. F. Gardner, R. R. Mill and M. W. Chase. 2011. A new classification and linear sequence of extant gymnosperms. Phytotaxa 19: 55-70. 

  6. Eichler, A. W. 1889. Coniferae. In Die Naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Vol. 1. Engler, A. and K. Prantl (eds.), Engelmann, Leipzig. Pp. 28-116. 

  7. Gaussen, H. 1979. Les Gymnospermes actuelles et fossiles. Fascicule 15. Chapitre 23-25. Les Taxines. Travaux du Laboratoire forestier de Toulouse, tome II 1: 1-24, 1-9, 1-82. 

  8. Ghimire, B. and K. Heo. 2014. Cladistic analysis of Taxaceae s.l. Plant Systematics and Evolution 300: 217-223. 

  9. Ghimire, B., C. Lee and K. Heo. 2014. Leaf anatomy and its implication for phylogenetic relationship in Taxaceae s.l. Journal of Plant Research 127: 373-388. 

  10. Ghimire, B., C. Lee and K. Heo. 2015. Comparative wood anatomy of Taxaceae. Australian Systematic Botany 28: 160-172. 

  11. Greguss, P. 1955. Identification of Living Gymnosperms on the Basis of Xylotomy. Akad Kiado, Budapest, 263 pp (Taxaceae, 147, 148, 150-157, pls, 73, 78-89). 

  12. Hao, D. C., B. L. Huang, S. L. Chen and J. Mu. 2009. Evolution of the chloroplast trnL-trnF region in the gymnosperm lineages Taxaceae and Cephalotaxaceae. Biochemical Genetics 47: 351-369. 

  13. Hao, D. C., P. G. Xiao, B. Huang, G. B. Ge and L. Yang. 2008. Interspecific relationships and origin of Taxaceae and Cephalotaxaceae revealed by partitioned Bayesian analyses of chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 276: 89-104. 

  14. Hart, J. A. 1987. A cladistic analysis of conifers: Preliminary results. Journal of Arnold Arboretum 68: 269-307. 

  15. Hu, Y. S. and F. H. Wang. 1989. Anatomy and affinities of Cephalotaxus (Cephalotaxaceae). Cathaya 1: 37-48. 

  16. Janchen, E. 1949. Das system der Koniferen. Osterr. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Naturwiss. Kl Sitzungsber. Abteilung 158: 155-262. 

  17. Keng, H. 1969. Aspect of morphology of Amentotaxus formosana with a note on the taxonomic position of the genus. Journal of Arnold Arboretum 50: 432-448. 

  18. Kershaw, A. P., H. A. Martin and J. R. C. McEwen Mason. 1994. The neogene: a period of transition. In History of the Australian Vegetation: Cretaceous to Recent. Hill, R. S. (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Pp. 299-327. 

  19. Lang, X.-D., J.-R. Su, S.-G. Lu and Z.-J. Zhang. 2013. A taxonomic revision of the genus Cephalotaxus (Taxaceae). Phytotaxa 84: 1-24. 

  20. Leslie, A. B., J. M. Beaulieu, H. S. Rai, P. R. Carne, M. J. Donoghue and S. Mathews. 2012. Hemisphere-scale differences in conifer evolutionary dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109: 16217-16221. 

  21. Lu, Y., J.-H. Ran, D.-M. Guo, Z.-Y. Yang and X.-Q. Wang. 2014. Phylogeny and divergence times of gymnosperms inferred from single-copy nuclear genes. PLOS ONE 9: e107679. 

  22. Miller, C. N. Jr. 1977. Mesozoic conifers. Botanical Review 43: 217-280. 

  23. Page, C. N. 1990. Coniferophytina. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Vol. 1. Pteridophytes and Gymnosperms. Kramer, K. U. and P. S. Green (eds.), Springer, Berlin. Pp. 279-361. 

  24. Pant, D. D. 2000. Inclusion of Taxaceae in separate order, Taxales. Current Science 79: 278-279. 

  25. Phillips, E. W. J. 1941. The identification of coniferous woods by their microscopic structure. Botanical Journal of Linnean Society 52: 259-320. 

  26. Pilger, R. 1903. Taxaceae. In Pflanzenr 4 (Heft 18). Engler, A. and K. Prantl (eds.), Berlin. Pp. 1-124. 

  27. Pilger, R. 1916. Die Taxales. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Dendrologischen Gesellschaft 25: 1-28. 

  28. Pilger, R. 1926. Coniferae. In Nat. Pflanzenfam. Ed. 2. Vol. 13. Engler, A. & K. Prantl (eds.), Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig. Pp. 99-403. 

  29. Price, R. A. 2003. Generic and familial relationship of the Taxaceae from rbcL and matK sequence comparison. Acta Horticulture 615: 235-237. 

  30. Price, R. R. 1990. The genera of Taxaceae in the southeastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 71: 69-91. 

  31. Prince, J. B. 1938. Stem-wood in the gymnosperms. Unpublished Master Thesis, University New Brunswick, pp. 96. 

  32. Quinn, C. J., R. A. Price and P. A. Gadak. 2002. Familial concepts and relationships in the conifers based on rbcL and matK sequence comparisons. Kew Bulletin 57: 513-531. 

  33. Semikhov, V. F., L. P. Arefeva, O. A. Novozhilova, A. S. Timoshchenko and D. S. Kostrikin. 2001. Systemic relationships of Podocarpales, Cephalotaxales, and Taxales based on comparative seed anatomy and biochemistry data. Biology Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences 28: 459-470. 

  34. Singh, H. 1961. The life history and systematic position of Cephalotaxus drupacea Sieb. et Zucc. Phytomorphology 11: 153-197. 

  35. Stutzel, T. and I. Rowekamp. 1999. Female reproductive structures in Taxales. Flora 194: 145-157. 

  36. Takhtajan ex Reveal. 1993. Cephalotaxales. Phytologia 74: 175. 

  37. Van Tieghem, M. P. .1891. Structure et affinities des Cephalotaxus. Bulletin de la Societe Botanique de France 38: 184-190. 

  38. Wilde, M. H. 1975. A new interpretation of microsporangiate cones in Cephalotaxaceae and Taxaceae. Phytomorphology 25: 434-450. 

  39. Won, H. and S. S. Renner. 2006. Dating dispersal and radiation in the gymnosperm Gnetum (Gnetales): clock calibration when outgroup relationships are uncertain. Systematic Biology 55: 610-622. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로