최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기Journal of Korean biological nursing science, v.21 no.1, 2019년, pp.54 - 61
이순진 (서울아산병원 간호부) , 정재심 (울산대학교 산업대학원 임상전문간호학) , 임경춘 (성신여자대학교 간호대학 간호학과) , 박은영 (서울아산병원 임상연구심의위원회) , 김혜연 (서울아산병원 간호부)
Purpose: This study aimed to identify the incidence and risks for pressure ulcer among older patients with hip fracture. Methods: The subject were 215 older patients suffering from hip fracture who were admitted for surgical operation from January 1, 2012 to April 30, 2016 in a university-affiliated...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
욕창위험사정이란? | 욕창위험사정은 입원 당시 간호사가 Bergstrom 등이 개발한 욕창 위험 평가 도구인 Braden scale [15]을 사용하여 환자의 피부 상태를 직접 사정한 후 평가한 점수이다. Braden scale은 6가지 항목으로 이루어져 있으며, 각 항목은 세부 항목들로 나누어져 있어서 간호 사가 선택하여 점수로 측정할 수 있다[15]. | |
욕창 발생군의 분류는? | 욕창은 United States National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP)과 Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance (PPPIA)에서 제시한 욕창단계 분류 [12,13]에 따라 피부를 사정하였다. 욕창 발생군은 욕창 1-4단계, 분류불가능(unstageable), 심부조직손상의심(suspected deep tissue injury)으로 분류하였으며, 발적이나 피부 파괴가 없는 경우를 욕창 비발생군으로 정의하였다. | |
Braden scale의 6가지 항목의 구성과 점수형태는 어떻게 되어있는가? | Braden scale은 6가지 항목으로 이루어져 있으며, 각 항목은 세부 항목들로 나누어져 있어서 간호 사가 선택하여 점수로 측정할 수 있다[15]. 즉, 감각인지(sensorial perception), 습기(moisture), 활동상태(activity level), 움직임(mobility), 영양상태(nutrition)는 각각 1-4점, 피부마찰과 쏠림(friction/shearing)은 1-3점으로 구성되어 있으며, 총 점수는 최저 6점에서 최고 23 점까지로, 점수가 높을수록 욕창 발생 위험이 낮은 것을 의미한다. 도구의 총점이 12점 이하인 경우가 고위험군, 13-14점은 중위험군, 15-18점은 저위험군으로 분류된다. |
The Korean geriatrics society. Textbook of Geriatric Medicine (3rd Ed.), Seoul: Bummun Education, 2015. p. 501-10.
Kwon YS, Kim HJ. Review articles: Quality of life in patients with hip fractures. The Journal of the Korean Hip Society. 2009;21(1):17-21.
Suh YS, Kim BM. Orthopaedic surgical treatment of hip fractures. The Journal of Korean Hip Society. 2009;21(2):127-140.
Hung WW, Egol KA, Zuckerman JD, Siu AL. Hip fracture management: tailoring care for the older patient.The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2012;307(20):2185-2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.4842.
Ireland AW, Kelly PJ, Cumming RG. Total hospital stay for hip fracture: measuring the variations due to pre-fracture residence, rehabilitation, complications and comorbidities. BMC Health Services Research. 2015;15:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0697-3
Kang MJ, Kim MS. Item analysis using classical test theory and item response theory, validity and reliability of the Korean version of a pressure ulcer prevention knowledge. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science. 2018;20(1):11-19 https://doi.org/10.7586/jkbns.2018.20.1.11
Jung YJ, Chung YH, Oh SJ, Lee SH, Kim YH, Kim TH, et al. Risk factors for pressure ulcer in severe trauma patients. Journal of Acute Care Surgery. 2015;5(1):19-27. http://doi.org/10.17479/jacs.2015.5.1.19
Rich SE, Shardell M, Hawkes WG, Margolis DJ, Amr S, Miller R, et al. Pressureredistributing support surface use and pressure ulcer incidence in elderly hip fracture patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2011;59(6):1052-1059. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03446.x
Baumgarten M, Margolis DJ, Orwig DL, Shardell MD, Hawkes WG, Langenberg P, et al. Pressure ulcers in elderly hip fracture patients across the continuum of care. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2009;57(5):863-870.
Shin KR, Kim M, Kang Y, Jung D, Cha C, Lee E, et al. Facility and nursing factors influence on pressure ulcer occurrence among patients at risk for pressure ulcer in long term care hospitals. Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing. 2012;14(1):30-39.
National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP), and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance(PPPIA). Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Quick Reference Guide. Emily Haesler (Ed.). Osborne Park, Australia: Cambridge Media; 2014. p. 12-17.
The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) announces a change in terminology from pressure ulcer to pressure injury and updates the stages of pressure injury [Internet]. Washington: the NPUAP, Rosemont, IL, 2016 Staging Consensus Conference; 2016 [cited 2018 April 17]. Available from: http://www.npuap.org/pr2.htm
Baumgarten M, Rich SE, Shardell MD, Hawkes WG, Margolis DJ, Langenberg P, et al. Care-related risk factors for hospital-acquired pressure ulcers in elderly adults with hip fracture. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2012;60(2):277-283. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03849.x.
Bergstrom N, Demuth PJ, Braden, BJ. A clinical trial of the Braden Scale for predicting pressure sore risk. The Nursing Clinics of North America, 1987;22(2):417-428.
Shin KR, Kim M, Kang Y, Jung D, Eom JY, Kweon YR. Pressure ulcers in long term care hospitals in Korea: Prevalence and risk factors. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society, 2012;32(1):115-127.
Lee YJ, Park S. Effects of pressure ulcer classification system education program on knowledge and visual discrimination ability of pressure ulcer classification and incontinence-associated dermatitis for hospital nurses. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science. 2014;16(4):342-348. http://doi.org/10.7586/jkbns.2014.16.4.342
Galvao NS, Serique MA, Santos VL, Nogueira PC. Knowledge of the nursing team on pressure ulcer prevention. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2017;70(2):294-300. http://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0063
Thompson M. Reducing pressure ulcers in hip fracture patients. British Journal of Nursing. 2013;20(15):S10, S12, S14-8. http://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2011.20.Sup8.S10
Hwang HY, Shin YS, Cho HS, Yeo JS. Risk Factors of Pressure Sore in Patients undergoing General Anesthesia. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2007;53:79-84.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.