참고문헌 (36)

1. Arnold, J., & Clarke, D. J. (2014). What is ‘agency'? Perspectives in science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 36(5), 735-754. 

   상세보기

2. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26. 

   상세보기

3. Bartholomew, H., Osborne, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2004). Teaching pupils "idea-about-science": Five dimensions of effective practice. Science Education, 88(5), 655-682. 

   상세보기

4. Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin'! Agency, Identity, and science learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 187-229. 

   상세보기

5. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications. 

6. Chin, C. A. & Malhotra, B. A. (2000). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218. 

7. Choe, H. S. & Tae J. M. (2015). The meaning and value of R&E (Research and Education) experiences of science specialized high schools: Gathering voices of graduates by individual interview. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 14(3), 51-79. 

8. Damsa. C. I., Kirschner, P. A., Andrissen, J. E. B., Erkens G., & Sins, P. H. M. (2010). Shared epistemic agency: An empirical study of an emergent construct. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 143-186. 

   상세보기

9. Durkheim, E. (1964). The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press. 

10. Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268-291. 

    상세보기

11. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press. 

12. Giddens, A. (2001). Mordernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Oxford: Polity Press. 

13. Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436-445. 

    상세보기

14. Goulart, M. I., & Roth, W. M. (2010) Engaging young childeren in collective curriculum design. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(3), 533-562. 

    상세보기

15. Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 

16. Jung, H. C., Chae, Y., & Ryu, C. R. (2012a). Study on research and education (R&E) programs in science high schools and science academies: Focusing on the differences of perceptions between students and mentors. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(7), 1139-1156. 

    원문보기 상세보기

17. Jung, H. C., Ryu, C. R., & Chae, Y. (2012b). Research and education (R&E) programs in science high schools and gifted high schools: Based on the interview results with R&E coordinators. Journal of Gifted and Talented Education, 22(2), 243-264. 

    원문보기 상세보기

18. Kang, S. J., Kim, H. J., Lee, G. J., Kwon, Y. S., Kim, M. H., Kim, Y. S., Kim, Y. H., Shin, H. S., Lim H. Y., & Ha, J. H. (2009). A study of scientifically gifted high school students' perceptions on the research and education program. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 29(6), 626-638. 

19. Kim, K. & Shim, J. Y. (2008). Scientifically gifted students' perception on the impact of R&E program based on KAIST freshmen survey. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 28(4), 282-290. 

20. Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., & Fredricks, J. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classroom: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Science, 7(3), 313-350 

    

21. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press. 

22. Lee, M., & Kim, H. (2016). Science high school students' shift in scientific practice and perception through the R&E participation: On the perspective of legitimate peripheral participation in the community of science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(3), 371-387. 

    원문보기 상세보기

23. Lee, J,. & Kim, S. (2018). Exploring the development of research questions from high school research project. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(3), 319-329. 

24. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury PA, CA: Sage Publications. 

25. Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press. 

26. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A guide to design and implementation (2nd ed). Sanfransisco, AV: Jossey-Bass. 

27. National Research Council (2000). National science education standards. Washington, DC; National Academy Press. 

28. Park, J., Jang, K, Lim, I. (2009). An analysis of the actual processes of physicists' research and implications for teaching scientific inquiry in school. Research in Science Education, 39(1). 111-129. 

    상세보기

29. Reed, B. (2001). Epistemic agency and the intellectual virtues. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 39(4), 507-526. 

    상세보기

30. Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634-656. 

    상세보기

31. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Jones (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67-98). Chicago: Open Court. 

32. Schwartz, D., & Okita, S. (2004). The productive agency in learning by teaching. Retrieved March 18, 2008, from http://aaalab.stanford.edu/papers/Productive_Agency_in_Learning_by_Teaching. pdf 

33. Sewell, W. H. Jr. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1-29. 

    상세보기

34. Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn scienceas-practice. Science Education, 98(3), 487-516. 

    상세보기

35. Stroupe, D., Caballero, M. D., & White, D. (2018). Fostering students' epistemic agency through the co-configuration of moth research. Science Education, 102(6), 1176-1200. 

    상세보기

36. Yun, H., & Kim, H. (2018). Exploring science high school students' epistemic goals, epistemic considerations and complexity of reasoning in open inquiry. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 38(4), 541-553. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

김희백 (75)