최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기환경영향평가 = Journal of environmental impact assessment, v.28 no.5, 2019년, pp.427 - 439
최지영 (이화여자대학교 환경공학과) , 이영수 (한국환경정책.평가연구원) , 이상돈 (이화여자대학교 환경공학과)
Natural environmental ecology ofthe environmental impact assessment(EIA)is very much lacking in quantitative evaluation. Thus, this study attempted to evaluate quantitative assessment for ecosystem service in the site of Eco-delta project in Busan. As a part of climate change adaptation, this study ...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
기존의 탄소 평가 기법에는 어떤 모형이 있나? | 2018). 기존 다양한 탄소 평가 기법들(BEAMS 모형, CEVSA모형, SIM-CYCLE모형, CBM-CFS3 모형)을 비교·평가한 선행논문들(Choi et al. 2014;Jo & Ahn 2000)에서 InVEST 모델을 이용한 탄소 고정량 추정은 오차율이 적고, Arc GIS 프로그램을 기반으로 탄소저장을 추정할 수 있어 용이하며, 의사결정 시스템을 통해 개발정책 이해관계자들의 협의 시 기초자료 제공이 가능한 모델로 시사되고 있다(Kovacs et al. | |
현재 자연생태환경분야에서 환경영향평가의 한계점은? | 환경영향평가는 사업의 경제성 도모와 동시에 지속가능한 환경보호를 위한 과정으로 개발정책 관계자들과 지역주민 의견수렴이 동반되는 과정이다. 현재 자연생태환경분야에서 식생 현황, 보호종 존재의 유무에 대한 평가가 집중되어있으며, 생물다양성과 관련된 서식지의 영향 및 예측, 대책은 구체적이지 못하다. 많은 개발 관계자들은 영향의 정도에 대해 ‘미평가’ 또는 정량적이지 않은 예측으로, 보전관계자와의 의견수렴 과정에서 한계점을 수반하고 있다. 환경영향평가 과정인 개발계획 수립부터 대안선정까지 ‘사회-경제환경’의 관계자들 사이에서 논쟁이 발생할 수 있는 부분에 생태계를 정량적으로 비교·평가할 수 있는 기법이 적용된다면, 불가피했던 비판과 논쟁에 이해의 자료로 도움을 줄 수 있을 것으로 판단한다. | |
InVEST Carbon 모델은 무엇인가? | InVEST Carbon 모델은 시기별 토지피복도 자료와 피복별 탄소풀 계수를 기반으로 추정된 탄소고정량과 경제성 평가가 가능한 모델이며, 특정 시기별 가치평가가 가능하여 과거, 현재, 미래의 차이를 알고자 할 경우 탄소고정량 변화와 미래예측이 가능한 모델이다. 최근 국내에서도 InVEST 모델을 적용한 연구(Choi et al. |
Ahn SE, Han KJ. 2004. A Study on the Land Use Model for Carbon Fixation. 2004. Korea Environment Institute. 2004: 1-106. [Korean Literature]
Bhagabati NK, Ricketts T, Sulistyawan TBS, Conte M, Ennaanay D, Hadian O, Wolny S. 2014. Ecosystem services reinforce Sumatran Tiger conservation in land use plans. Biological Conservation. 169: 147-156.
Charlotte B, Sylvain P, John DT. 2017. The inclusion of biodiversity in environmental impact assessment: Policy-related progress limited by gaps and semantic confusion. Journal of Environmental Management. 200(15): 35-45.
Choi HA, Lee WK, Jeon SW, Kim JS, Kwak HB, Kim MI, Kim JT. 2014. Quantifying Climate Change Regulating Service of Forest Ecosystem -Focus on Quantifying Carbon Storage and Sequestration-. J. Climate Change Research. 5(1): 21-36. [Korean Literature]
Choi JY, Lee SD. 2018. Evaluation of Ecosystem Service for Distribution of Korean fir using InVEST Model. J. Environ Impact Assess. 27(2): 181-193. [Korean Literature]
Choi JY, Lee SD. 2019. Application of Habitat Evaluation Procedure with Quantifying the Eco-Corridor in the Process of Environmental Impact Assessment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2016(16): 1437.
Dohwa Engineering, Pyunghwa Engineering, Hando Engineering, Meitec Engineering. 2018. Environmental Impact Assessment for the Development Project of Eco Delta City in Busan. Busan metropolitan city, Korea water resources corporation, Busan metropolitan corporation. [Korean Literature]
Duarte GT, Ribeiro MC, Paglia AP. 2016. Ecosystem Services Modeling as a Tool for Defining Priority Areas for Conservation. PLoS ONE 11(5): e0154573.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154573.
Environmental Spatial Information Service. https://egis.me.go.kr/main.do [2018.11.01.].
Gao J, Li F, Gao H, Zhou C, Zhang Xi. 2017. The impact of land-use change on waterrelated ecosystem services: a study of the Guishui River Basin, Beijing, China. J of Cleaner Production. 163(2017): 148-155.
Jang EK, Youn YC, Cha JH. 2012. Carbon Storage and GHG Substitution Effect of Domestic Wood Products. Forest Science Conference. 619-621. [Korean Literature]
Jeon EC, Sa JH, Lee SH, Kim CK. 2004. Development of Emission Factor of $CO_2$ from Stationary Sources. J. Atmospheric Environment. 1: 93-94. [Korean Literature]
Jo HK, Ahn TW. 2000. Indicators of Carbon Storage and Uptake by Tree Growth in Natural Ecosystem. Korean Society of Environment and Ecology. 14(3): 175-182. [Korean Literature]
Kim CG. 2012. Chapter 33 Climate change and countermeasures in the agricultural sector. Korea Rural Economic Institute. 2012(2): 1047-1074. [Korean Literature]
Kim JS, Kim CK, Yoo KJ Hwang SI. 2017. A Preliminary Study for Identifying Soil Management Area in Environmental Impact Assessment on Development Project. J. Environ Impact Assess. 26(6): 457-469. [Korean Literature]
Kim ME. 2013. Opportunity costs of carbon offsets project to private forest owners in Korea. Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. [Korean Literature]
Kim TY, Song CH, Lee WK, Kim MI, Kim CH, Jeon SW, Kim JS. 2015. Habitat Quality Valuation Using InVEST Model in Jeju Island. J. Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 18(5): 1-11. [Korean Literature]
Kwun YH, Roh TH, Lee HW, Choung HL. 2006. A Study on the Introduction of Biological Diversity Items in Environmental Assessment. Korea Environment Institute. 2006(0): 1-173.
Kyoto Protocol. 2003. UNEP (United Nations Environment Program), Korea Association for UN Environment.
Lee HW, Kim CK, Hong HJ, Rog YH, Kang SI, Kim JH, Shin SC, Lee SJ. 2015. Development of Decision Supporting Framework to Enhance Natural Capital Sustainability: Focusing on Ecosystem Service Analysis. Korea Environment Institute. 2015(0): 3479-3651. [Korean Literature]
Min KT. 2012. Chapter 29 Timber Supply and Demand Forecasts in Response to Climate Change. Korea Rural Economic Institute. 2012(2): 941-963. [Korean Literature]
Natural Capital Project. https://naturalcapitalproject.stanford.edu/invest/ [2018.08.29.].
Natural Capital Project. 2012. Informing Land-Use Plans in Central Sumatra. INVEST User Guide Release +VERSION.
Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron D, Chan KM, Daily G, Goldstein J, Kareiva P, Lonsdorf E, Naidoo R, Ricketts TH, Shaw MR. 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity Conservation, Commodity Production, and Tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 7(1): 4-11.
Nelson E, Sander H, Hawthorne P, Conte M, Ennaanay D, Wolny S, Manson S, Polasky S. 2010. Projecting Global Land-Use Change and Its Effect on Ecosystem Service Provision and Biodiversity with Simple Models. PLoS One. 5(12): e14327.
Polasky S, Nelson E, Pennington D, Johnson KA. 2011. The Impact of Land-Use Change on Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity and Returns to Landowners: A Case Study in the State of Minnesota. Environmental and Resource Economics. 48(2): 219-242.
Roh YH. 2016. Introduction to the Estimation of Carbon Storage and Space Distribution. Science and Technology Policy Institute. 26(5): 46-51. [Korean Literature]
Seo SB. 2017. Analysis of Habitat Quality in the Nam-Han River Upstream Watershed using InVEST Model. Ewha Woman University. Seoul, Korea.
Sharp R, Tallis HT, Ricketts T, Guerry AD, Wood SA, Chaplin-Kramer R, Nelson E, Wolny S, Olwero N, Vigerstol K, Pennington D, Mendoza G, Aukema J, Foster J, Forrest J, Cameron D, Arkema K, Lonsdorf E, Kennedy C, Verutes G, Kim CK, Guannel G, Papenfus M, Tofr J, Marsik M, Bernhardt J, Griffin R, Glowinski K, Chaumount N, Perelaman A, Lacayo M, Mandle L, Hamel P, Vogl AL, Rogers L, Bierbower W. 2015. InVEST User's Guide. Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, World Wildlife Fund.
Shoyama K, Yamagata Y. 2014. Predicting landuse change for biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation and its effect on ecosystem services in a watershed in Japan. J of Ecosystem Services. 8(2014): 25-34.
Tao Y, Li F, Wang R, Zhao D. 2015. Effects of land use and cover change on terrestrial carbon stocks in urbanized areas: a study from Changzhou, China. J of Cleaner Production. 103(15): 651-657.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. http://unfccc.int/ [2018.09.20.].
Yi H, Guneralp B, Kreuter UP, Guneralp I, Filippi AM. 2108. Spatial and temporal changes in biodiversity and ecosystem services in the San Antonio River Basin, Texas, from 1984 to 2010. J of Science of the Total Environment. 619-620(2018): 1259-1271.
Youn YC, Cha JH. 2007. The Role of Forest and Measures of Gyeonggi Province to Cope with the UN Framework Convention of Climate Change. Gyeonggi Development Institute. 9(4): 117-140. [Korean Literature]
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.