[논문]커뮤니티 주도 시민농장의 특징과 박탈감 지역의 시민농장 활성화 방안 - 영국 셰필드 시민농장을 사례로 -

남진보

doi:10.9715/kila.2021.49.5.138

[국내논문] 커뮤니티 주도 시민농장의 특징과 박탈감 지역의 시민농장 활성화 방안 - 영국 셰필드 시민농장을 사례로 -
The Characteristics of Community-Driven Allotments and Revitalisation of Allotments in Deprived Areas - Focusing on the Case of Sheffield, UK - 원문보기

한국조경학회지 = Journal of Korean institute of landscape architecture, v.49 no.5, 2021년, pp.138 - 150

남진보 (국립목포대학교 조경학과)

초록
AI-Helper

본 연구의 목적은 시민농장 활성화와 적극적 거버넌스형 체재의 대표적인 국가인 영국의 시민농장 활성화 배경과 특징을 분석하고, 사회·경제적으로 열악한 지역의 시민농장 활성화를 위한 시사점을 제시하고자 하였다. 연구 방법으로 영국의 19세기 초반 이후 시민농장 관련 정책, 영국 셰필드의 시민농장 운영 체계 및 커뮤니티의 특징, 설문을 통한 시민농장에 대한 인식을 조사하였다. 그 결과, 1806년 일찍이 영국 시민농장 활성화를 위한 정책은 지방정부의 권한 이양과 용지매입을 시작으로 최근까지 지속적으로 관련 정책을 생산하고 있었다. 시민농장의 운영 체계는 적극적 거버넌스의 구조적 지원과 체계로 이루어지고 있었다. 흥미로운 것은 지방정부가 커뮤니티 활성화를 위한 전담 부서를 운영하고 있다는 것이다. 커뮤니티 단체는 권한 이양을 바탕으로 관리, 파트너십, 재원 마련, 모니터링 등을 주도하는 적극적 거버넌스 구조로 되어 있었다. 그러나, 사회·경제적 특징에 따른 시민농장의 활성화에 차이를 보였다. 사회·경제적 지수가 낮은 지역보다 높은 지역에서 높은 활성화 경향을 보였다. 그러나, 설문 조사 결과, 사회·경제적 지수가 낮은 지역에서 시민농장과 커뮤니티 활동 참여 선호에 대한 긍정적 응답이 높았다. 이에 사회·경제적으로 열악한 커뮤니티 활성화를 위해 Public-Community-Private-Partnership 체재 도입의 필요성을 시사하였다. 결론적으로, 공공부문의 커뮤니티 활성화 정책 지원과 지방정부의 용지매입을 가능케 하는 지속적인 정책, 적극적 거버넌스 체계를 위한 전담 부서 조직 및 커뮤니티 활성화 지원, 사회·경제적 차이에 따른 박탈감 해소를 선행으로 하는 시민농장 활성화를 통해 긍정적 혜택을 모든 이가 누릴 기회를 제공해야 한다. 그러나, 본 연구가 오랜 역사적 정책과 사회적 합의가 이루어진 영국의 사례를 바탕으로 하였기에 국내 도입을 위한 실현가능성의 한계 또한 예상되는 바이다. 그러나, 본 연구를 통해 실현가능성의 한계를 축소화하기 위한 시사점을 제공하기에 연구의 의미를 가진다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

This study aims to understand the background and characteristics of the UK's allotments, as the UK is one of the nations participating in allotment invigoration. This study will focus on approaches to policy, active governance, and socioeconomic impact. To address this, allotment-related issues, policies since the beginning of the 19th century were analysed. In addition to this, Sheffield City, UK, was selected as a specific case to analyse the framework of allotment management, active governance concerning allotment management, and the residents' perceptions of allotments through a questionnaire survey. It was found first that the UK government, since 1806, has been consistently producing localism policies aiming to devolve management authority into local governments, which actively obtain sites for allotments. Secondly, the structure of allotment management formed in active governance leads the overall maintenance, partnership, income generation, and monitoring of the allotments. Interestingly, the structure of the department organisation of local government in Sheffield established the position of community manager, who encourages community invigoration. However, a gap between socioeconomic aspects was found in which the allotment invigoration in lesser deprived areas outweighs the invigoration in more deprived areas. In contrast, according to the questionnaire survey, respondents in more deprived areas were more likely to be involved in allotment activities and the community. The key to addressing the socioeconomic gap in the context of allotment invigoration is the adoption of the Public-Community-Private-Partnership framework. This will be of great importance to longer-term promotion of beneficial allotment practices.

Keyword

참고문헌 (48)

Alaimo, K., E. Packnett, R. Miles and D. Kruger(2008) Fruit and vegetable intake among urban community gardeners. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 40(2): 94-101.

상세보기
Barron, J.(2016) Community gardening: Cultivating subjectivities, space, and justice. Local Environment 22: 1142-1158.

상세보기
Bragg, R., C. Wood, J. Barton and J. Pretty(2012) Let Nature Feed Your Senses: Engaging People with Nature, Food and Farming. Essex Sustainability Institute and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Essex: Essex, UK.
Calleau, J.(2005) The benefits of volunteers attending cherry tree nursery. growth point. The Journal of Social and Therapeutic Horticulture 101: 20-22.
Catanzaro, C. and E. Ekanem(2004) Home gardeners value stress reduction and interaction with nature. SHS Acta Horticulturae Congress 639:269-275.
Certoma, C. and C. Tornaghi(2015) Political gardening. Transforming cities and political agency. Local Environment 20(10):1123-1131.

상세보기
Chen, C., W. Luo., H. Li., D. Zhang., N. Kang., X. Yang and Y. Xia(2020) Impact of perception of green space for health promotion on willingness to use parks and actual use among young urban residents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(15): 5560.

상세보기
Choi, J(2011) A study on the public-private partnership in large-scale urban development. Journal of Environmental Studies 50: 3-18.
Choi, J. M., M. I. Wilson., K. I. Shim and E. Jeoung(2011) Implications for development of kliengartens in Korea: Results of a survey of experts. Journal of Rural Development 34(1): 39-69.
Choi, M. W.(2019) A Study of the Residents' Consciousness on Special Projects for the Private Park Development. Master Dissertation Dongeui University.
Connell B. R., J. A. Sanford and D. Lewis(2007) Therapeutic effects of an outdoor activity program on nursing home residents with dementia. Journal of Housing For the Elderly 21(3-4): 195-209.

상세보기
Department for Communities and Local Government(2009) Understanding the Different Roles of Deprived Neighbourhoods. Department for Communities and Local Government: London.
Draper, C. and D. Freedman(2010) Review and analysis of the benefits, purposes, and motivations associated with community gardening in the United States. Journal of Community Practice 18(4): 458-492.

상세보기
Hawkins, J. L., J. Mercer, K. J. Thirlaway and D. A. Clayton(2013) "Doing" gardening and "Being" at the allotment site: Exploring the benefits of allotment gardening for stress reduction and healthy aging. Ecopsychology 5(2): 110-125.

상세보기
Heynen, N., H. A. Perkins and P. Roy(2006) The political ecology of uneven urban green space: the impact of political economy on race and ethnicity in producing environmental inequality in Milwaukee. Urban Affairs Review 42: 3-25.

상세보기
Jarrot, S. and C. Gigliotti(2010) Comparing responses to horticultural-based and traditional activities in dementia care programmes. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias 25(8): 657-665.

상세보기
Jeong, S. J., H. S. Jang., E. H. Yoo., J. S. Kim and G. W. Lee(2019) The effects of the level of plant growing activity on the subjective health, depression, and human relations of the elderly participating in weekend farms. Korean Society of Rural Planning 25(4): 57-64.

원문보기 상세보기
Jeongng, J. W. and J. H. Yeo(2014) Estimation of hedonic price on a weekend farm amenity -Focusing on weekend farm in Daegu. Korean Association of Regional Studies 22(4): 43-56.
Kamata, Y(2008) The practicability of horticultural therapy for asthmatic children: Program description. International Society for Horticultural Science 790: 75-82.
Kim, J., Y. Lee., J. Park, and W. Seo(2020) Public-Private Partnership Introduction and Overview. Seoul: ParkYoung Story. pp. 8-9.
Kim, Y(2019) Development of index of park derivation to promote inclusive living SOC policy. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 47(5): 28-40.
Kingsley, J. Y., M. Townsend and C. Henderson-Wilson(2009) cultivating health and wellbeing: members' perceptions of the health benefits of a port melbourne community garden. Leisure Study 28(2): 207-219.

상세보기
Lin, B. B., R. A. Fuller, R. Bush, K. J. Gaston and D. F. Shanahan(2014) Opportunity or orientation? Who uses urban parks and why. PLOS One 9(1):e87422.

상세보기
McMillan, D. W. and D. Chavis(1986) Sense of Community: A Definition and Theory. Journal of Community Psychology 14(1): 6-23.

상세보기
Nam, J(2020) A study on policy approaches to income generation for parks and green spaces in the 19th century, the victorian era, UK. Journal of the Korea Institute of Garden Design 6(3): 237-244.
Nam, J(2021) Exploring discourse and issue on the policy of England greenbelt -Delivering opportunities for housing development and recreation-. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 24(3): 1-18.

원문보기 상세보기
Nam, J. and N. Dempsey(2020) Acceptability of income generation practices in 21st century urban park management: The case of city district parks". Journal of Environmental Management 264(2020):109948.
Nam, J. and H. Kim(2019) Differential levels of governance and its impact on urban park management and users' satisfaction - The case of Sheffield District Parks, UK. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 47(4): 50-60.

원문보기 상세보기
Nam, J. and N. Dempsey(2018) Community food growing in parks? Assessing the acceptability and feasibility in Sheffield, UK. Sustainability 10(8): 2887.

상세보기
Nam, J. and N. Dempsey(2019) Understanding stakeholder perceptions of acceptability and feasibility of formal and informal planting in Sheffield's district parks. Sustainability 11(2): 360.

상세보기
ODPM(2002) Planning Policy Guidance 17: Planning for Open Space, Sport & Recreation. London: The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
Ransley, J. K., E. F. Taylor., Y. Radwan,., M. Kitchen ., D. C. Greenwood and J. E. Cade.(2010) Does nutrition education in primary schools make a difference to children's fruit and vegetable consumption?. Public Health Nutrition 13: 1898-1904.

상세보기
Ratcliffe, M. M., K. A. Merrigan, B. L. Rogers and J. P. Goldberg(2011) Behaviors associated with vegetable consumption. The effects of school garden experiences on middle school-aged students' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors associated with vegetable consumption. Health Promotion Practice 12(1): 36-43.

상세보기
Sadako, N.(2012) The effects of gardening therapy for asthmatic children. Allergy in Practice 286: 150-153.
Shanahan, D. F., B. B. Lin, K. Gaston, R. Bush and R. A. Fuller(2014) Socio-economic inequalities in access to nature on public and private lands: A case study from Brisbane, Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning 130: 14-23.

상세보기
Son, H. and J. Choi(2011) A study on development of Korean garden community : Focused on plan of complex and facility. Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association 23(5): 119-144.
Stigsdotter, U. A.(2005) Urban green spaces: Promoting health through city planning. Advance In: Inspiring Global Environmental Standards and Ethical Practices, The National Association of Environmental Professionals. NAEP, 30th Annual Conference, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
Stocker, L. and K. Barnett.(2007) The significance and praxis of community based sustainability projects: Community gardens in western Australia. The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 3(2): 179-189.
Sustain(2014a) The Benefits of Gardening and Food Growing for Health and Wellbeing. London: A Sustain Publication.
Sustain(2014b) Planning Sustainable Cities for Community Food Growing. London: A Sustain Publication.
Unruh, A. M.(2004) The meaning of gardens and gardening in daily life: A comparison between gardeners with serious health problems and healthy participants. Acta Hort 639:.67-73.

상세보기
Yasukawa, M(2009) Horticultural therapy for cognitive functioning of elderly people with dementia. Advance In: I. Soderback. International Handbook of Occupational Therapy Interventions. Springer Dordrecht, Heidelberg Part 4:431-444.
You, C. J. and D. H. Jang(2002) The analysis of the degree of cognition and satisfaction of city residents on weekend farms. The Korean Rural Sociological Society 12(1):63-88.
Zick, C. D., K. R. Smith, L. Kowaleski-Jones, C. Uno and B. Merrill(2013) Harvesting more than vegetables: The potential weight control benefits of community gardening. American Journal of Public Health 103(6):1110-1115.

상세보기
https://dig-for-victory.org.uk
https://www.incredible-edible-todmorden.co.uk
https://twitter.com/growsheffield
https://www.who.int/campaigns/connecting-the-world-to-combat-coronavirus/healthyathome?gclidEAIaIQobChMI4ur50N-i8gIVzl1gCh2PxgJ2EAAYASAAEgJLe_D_BwE

활용도 분석정보

상세보기

다운로드

내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format